88 réponses à ce sujet

[Supreme Leech]

Deerber wrote...

XFG-65 wrote...

I almost always skip the passives on the vorcha sentinel.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha



Oh my God did I read that right?!!?!?





Hahaha I friggin' can't stop laughing Lakook, hahahaha thank you sooo much for this!

I don't get it, why did that make you laugh?

[Deerber]

XFG-65 wrote...

I don't get it, why did that make you laugh?

Cause it's like... The worst possible class to go without passives? 

Modifié par Deerber, 19 octobre 2013 - 06:31 .

[Cirvante]

Deerber wrote...

XFG-65 wrote...

I don't get it, why did that make you laugh?

Cause it's like... The worst possible class to go without passives? 

No, it's not.

I wouldn't do it myself, but he could do much worse. Like running any Turian or Drell without passives.

[Learn To Love Yourself]

b00g13man wrote...

Tokenusername wrote...

Nope.

[Deerber]

Cirvante wrote...

Deerber wrote...

XFG-65 wrote...

I don't get it, why did that make you laugh?

Cause it's like... The worst possible class to go without passives? 

No, it's not.

I wouldn't do it myself, but he could do much worse. Like running any Turian or Drell without passives.

Yeah I didn't mean to say it's really the worst. But it's among the worsts for sure. You've got two stupidly high direct-damage powers. Why on Earth would you want to avoid making them even moar damaging? Not to mention the weapon damage... If you really, really can't do without some ranks in fitness split and go 4/4. But for Amonkira's sake, don't skip that bloody passive...

[Supreme Leech]

The vorcha needs some ranks in fitness. I never play him as a level 20, so I always just try to max out all his powers first and put any remaining points into fitness. He has the worst passives in the game. Either you're a good troll or you're extremely stupid. I'm inclined to think it's the latter. We're not talking about turian/batarian/geth/drell passives here. Vorcha passives are so bad they're not even worth looking at. Use power amplifiers and you can compensate for his bad passives.

[Evil]

Deerber wrote...

Cirvante wrote...

Deerber wrote...

XFG-65 wrote...

I don't get it, why did that make you laugh?

Cause it's like... The worst possible class to go without passives? 

No, it's not.

I wouldn't do it myself, but he could do much worse. Like running any Turian or Drell without passives.

Yeah I didn't mean to say it's really the worst. But it's among the worsts for sure. You've got two stupidly high direct-damage powers. Why on Earth would you want to avoid making them even moar damaging? Not to mention the weapon damage... If you really, really can't do without some ranks in fitness split and go 4/4. But for Amonkira's sake, don't skip that bloody passive...

SA 66606 VorSent could still be quite decent, if it's played as a melee build which relies on fire explosions to kill bosses rather than the damage from the flamer and cluster grenades, since 6+6 FE's are quite potent, and a VorSent can churn out FE's very quickly by toggling the flamer on and off again quickly then nading, rather than spamming the flamer constantly.

I prefer the 66653 build, but 66606 melee is certainly valid, I use my 36656 VorEng as a melee kit in a similar manner.

The melee VorSent build:kalence.drupalgardens.com/me3-builder#46!3402575!2301545!13O56313!EDD.8G

Modifié par Evil Mastered, 19 octobre 2013 - 06:59 .

[Wizard of Ox]

Aren't Vortcha's passives worth 35% power damage bonus?

[Evil]

KroGan_eRRanT wrote...

Aren't Vortcha's passives worth 35% power damage bonus?

That's what kalence says.  Sounds about right.

[Supreme Leech]

KroGan_eRRanT wrote...

Aren't Vortcha's passives worth 35% power damage bonus?

Yeah. Which is nothing. An extra 35% to flamer/grenade damage will do very little for you on platinum. Four ranks in fitness won't really help that much either, but that's still better than his bad passives. Do people really run no-fitness vorchas on unknown platinum?

[Deerber]

XFG-65 wrote...

Do people really run no-fitness vorchas on unknown platinum?

I know I do.

[OniGanon]

I don't play any of the Flamer kits (because they annoy me when others fill my screen with that crap, so I don't inflict it on others), but assuming it involves a Power Mag on the gun, Power Amp IV, and the Power Damage evo on Bloodlust, taking full power damage on the passive adds something like ~14% to your Flamer damage.

Modifié par OniGanon, 19 octobre 2013 - 08:08 .

[Kirrahe Airlines CEO]

Pheonix adept and the valkyrie are the two that I can remember off the top of my head that I run no passives on.

[Jelena Jankovic]

Krogan Warlord (but I only solo with him)

Some I run with only 3 in the passive,though