Filament wrote...
Fast Jimmy wrote...
It is always dicey trying to justify things with numbers (especially numbers we don't have solid grasps on), but I would say a pretty solid case could be made that even if DA2 made money and sold well according to Bioware's projections and expectations, it was still viewed negatively by a larger portion of the total "Dragon Age fanbase" (if we assume that is anyone who has bought a DA game ever).
And how many people is that? Since we don't know how much overlap there is between DA2 and DAO buyers (probably a lot), nor the amount of people who bought and liked/didn't like each particular game, I'd say coming to any such conclusion is dicey indeed.
I'd say it is fairly easy to make a generalization that DA2 was not as well received as Origins.
DA:O, with all of its ancillary products, sold between 4 and 5 million units, of that we can be sure. If you look at the twenty largest game review sites, you'd without a doubt see consistent ratings that put it in the top 15 or 20th percentile of ratings, across both professional and fan review sites (such as Metacritic).
DA2, again, with all of its ancillary products, sold between 2 and 3 million units, of that we can be sure. If you look at the same twenty review sites, you'd also see consistent ratings that put it in the top 30 or 40th percentile of ratings.
A game's quality cannot be judged by sales or review scores, but that's not what we are talking about here. We are talking about sheer numbers of people who disliked the DA2 approach over the DA:O. Of that, I can say there is serious statistical data that can back that statement up.
Now... WHY that could be is a VERY difficult statement to answer. If you point to the lower sales and ratings and say "this is due to Bioware using a voiced protagonist for their fantasy RPG games," then you'd be grasping at straws, because there is not (nearly) enough data to make that claim.
But to say that millions of people that either purchased DA2 (or didn't like what they saw enough to buy it) liked what DA:O did over (or at least what they perceived) DA2 did isn't a stretch of any facts or numbers. It's like saying a politician winning an election by a landslide wasn't necessarily the most favored or popular candidate - sure, there's a remote possibility that it is true, but it defies nearly all the numbers, feedback and public discourse available that one could use to make that conclusion.
Modifié par Fast Jimmy, 24 octobre 2013 - 01:01 .