DatOneFanboy wrote...
Chaos Hammer wrote...
who said its 3 3 3... origins was 5 2 2 and DA2 was 2, 3 1/2, 2
(Warrior, rogue, mage)
implying that dog is a warrior.
Dog is a ****ing dog.
Dog's class was "Mage Eater"
DatOneFanboy wrote...
Chaos Hammer wrote...
who said its 3 3 3... origins was 5 2 2 and DA2 was 2, 3 1/2, 2
(Warrior, rogue, mage)
implying that dog is a warrior.
Dog is a ****ing dog.
Modifié par Shark17676, 29 octobre 2013 - 03:01 .
Shark17676 wrote...
Really, think about it -- why would they give a new character so much attention? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck...then it's probably a duck.
Modifié par David Gaider, 29 octobre 2013 - 03:15 .
thats1evildude wrote...
My gut feeling is that the Iron Bull isn't a companion, but rather an adversary. Sure, he's been featured in a bunch of concept art, so he's clearly going to be in the game. But if the proverbial cat is out of the bag, why not just say he was a companion?
Also, I get an ominous vibe from the guy. In all the concept art I've seen, he's always by himself, except in one image where he seems to be in close proximity to a dragon. I would not be surprised in the least if he wasn't acting as a sort of lieutenant to the actual Big Bad.
David Gaider wrote...
Shark17676 wrote...
Really, think about it -- why would they give a new character so much attention? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck...then it's probably a duck.
You do realize that there are very likely to be characters in the story who are, in fact, not party members? Short of seeing such a character actively traveling in the company of the PC, it's best not to assume you know the context in which they appear.
David Gaider wrote...
Shark17676 wrote...
Really, think about it -- why would they give a new character so much attention? If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck...then it's probably a duck.
You do realize that there are very likely to be characters in the story who are, in fact, not party members? Short of seeing such a character actively traveling in the company of the PC, it's best not to assume you know the context in which they appear.
Mesina2 wrote...
Can someone explain me popularity with Cullen?
He's not a bad character nor a boring one, but I don't see how he has such appeal that I see him often suggested to be a companion.
Modifié par frankf43, 29 octobre 2013 - 07:57 .
Modifié par frankf43, 29 octobre 2013 - 07:57 .
Mesina2 wrote...
Can someone explain me popularity with Cullen?
He's not a bad character nor a boring one, but I don't see how he has such appeal that I see him often suggested to be a companion.
Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 29 octobre 2013 - 07:54 .
Modifié par Mesina2, 29 octobre 2013 - 08:00 .
Mesina2 wrote...
@TheKomandorShepard
Hmh, only time I can remember Alistair whining is when nearly every Grey Warden died at Ostagar, including Duncan who he sees as a father figure.
And you can ask him to not talk about it all and he will.
While... when did Cullen whine?
And I don't see connection between the two, besides both had Templar training. Oh and have same hair color.
I'm still confused.
@Beerfish
Well, is there a law against Templar's and mages can't be in love?
Or it's just Cullen's anti-mage sentiment after what happen in Ferelden's Circle?
Beerfish wrote...
That forbidden templar love in DAO with Cullen stammering all over the place with the female warden. He also has the hair.
Mesina2 wrote...
@TheKomandorShepard
So, that mean his fangirls didn't agree with him most of the time?
Then why did... never mind.
Mesina2 wrote...
Can someone explain me popularity with Cullen?
And that, my friends, is the best argument to see Cullen again in DA:I, versus the 'Dayum, he fine!" one I've heard to death, even though it kind of true, that's not a good reason.Elfman wrote...
Mesina2 wrote...
Can someone explain me popularity with Cullen?
Because the guy has probably had more character development than another other NPC? In Origins, he was very sympathetic to the plight of the mages, but while also balancing his loyalty to the Chantry and his duty to the Templar Order. The Uldred fiasco radically changed his perception of them, having seen his friends tortured and killed by demons and psychologically tormented himself and he became a bit of a Chantry zealot. But when he was moved the Kirkwall and saw the much harsher treatment of mages there, he slowly began to once again question his views and wonder is it fair, is it right to treat mages like this? Then he finally realises Meredith has gone too far and stands up to her.
He's been forced from one extreme to the other and landed in very murky, ambiguous territory. His character could go either way, I feel. And throw in an (at least) ten year strong lyrium addiction, (which I vaguely remember the writers expressing the view that they really haven't done it much justice in the past), and you have some very interesting implications for DA:I.
Modifié par ScreechingViolence, 29 octobre 2013 - 10:45 .