Modifié par Naughty Bear, 25 octobre 2013 - 07:47 .
Anyone fancy visiting a once in a life time performance?
Débuté par
Naughty Bear
, oct. 25 2013 07:46
Retour en haut
#3
Posté 25 octobre 2013 - 08:17
Naughty Bear
-
- Members
- 5 209 messages
Interested? It is free to visit I believe.
#4
Posté 25 octobre 2013 - 08:33
Liamv2
-
- Members
- 19 052 messages
Hell no! That is just way too creepy for me. Perhaps i am overly sensitive but i would be so damn embarrassed watching that.
Modifié par Liamv2, 25 octobre 2013 - 08:34 .
#5
Posté 25 octobre 2013 - 09:07
bmwcrazy
-
- Members
- 3 622 messages
Tempting but I don't think it's worth a round trip plane ticket.
#6
Posté 25 octobre 2013 - 09:27
EarthboundNess
-
- Members
- 3 333 messages
Surprised this hasn't sparked the usual 'This is an outrage!' response that usually appears when anything to do with sex appears in the media.
Especially considering the whole thing is a little...strange.
Ah well. Good for you, society!
Especially considering the whole thing is a little...strange.
Ah well. Good for you, society!
#7
Posté 26 octobre 2013 - 12:06
kobayashi-maru
-
- Members
- 1 115 messages
Earthbound N wrote...
Surprised this hasn't sparked the usual 'This is an outrage!' response that usually appears when anything to do with sex appears in the media.
Especially considering the whole thing is a little...strange.
Ah well. Good for you, society!
It did but oddly (in a good way) the press had issue with virginity and the sex but not fact it was two men. Personally I don't get the issue art is in eye of beholder, I've seen pornography and arthouse cinema which contains real sex, I never understood the one is art the other not. Both are designed to titillate - for most part.
What is Caligula? Or where does Shortbus fit in? It's way to confusing an issue. I say if he wants to do it let him, it's intriguing method to get your name known in art world. At least it will be safe sex.
#8
Posté 26 octobre 2013 - 10:05
Eternal Phoenix
-
- Members
- 8 471 messages
So it's live action gay pornography? No thanks.
Best just to ignore this creep. Which is thankfully what the media is doing. We have enough attention ****s flooding the media without someone like this adding to it. (Just look at his portfolio)
Challenging the idea of sexuality? More like making more people hate gays because things like this make people think that they're all sex obsessed, flamboyant and crazy. I typically hate the casanova's of all sexualities who feel the need to pubically exhibit their sexuality as if the world gives two ****s.
And yes I would say the same thing if it was a heterosexual man losing his virginity to a woman in front of a live audience or a woman losing her virginity to another woman. This is more or less a performance of/for voyeurism & exhibitionism (which are fetishes which aren't particularly in the healthy category), not art. This is nothing new.
Why does modern society feel the need to expose themselves to the world? Some things should always remain private. Humans should always retain some decency.
It's his own will if he wishes to do this and the will of ones so weird to go and watch such a show but what annoys me most is that he says it's art and in the name of art. I contend that pornography is not art. Voyeurism & exhibitionism are not art-forms, just unhealthy psychological conditions in a world which is losing limits.
Best just to ignore this creep. Which is thankfully what the media is doing. We have enough attention ****s flooding the media without someone like this adding to it. (Just look at his portfolio)
Challenging the idea of sexuality? More like making more people hate gays because things like this make people think that they're all sex obsessed, flamboyant and crazy. I typically hate the casanova's of all sexualities who feel the need to pubically exhibit their sexuality as if the world gives two ****s.
And yes I would say the same thing if it was a heterosexual man losing his virginity to a woman in front of a live audience or a woman losing her virginity to another woman. This is more or less a performance of/for voyeurism & exhibitionism (which are fetishes which aren't particularly in the healthy category), not art. This is nothing new.
Why does modern society feel the need to expose themselves to the world? Some things should always remain private. Humans should always retain some decency.
It's his own will if he wishes to do this and the will of ones so weird to go and watch such a show but what annoys me most is that he says it's art and in the name of art. I contend that pornography is not art. Voyeurism & exhibitionism are not art-forms, just unhealthy psychological conditions in a world which is losing limits.
#9
Posté 26 octobre 2013 - 10:18
Kaiser Arian XVII
-
- Members
- 17 303 messages
Elton John is dead wrote...
So it's live action gay pornography? No thanks.
Best just to ignore this creep. Which is thankfully what the media is doing. We have enough attention ****s flooding the media without someone like this adding to it. (Just look at his portfolio)
Challenging the idea of sexuality? More like making more people hate gays because things like this make people think that they're all sex obsessed, flamboyant and crazy. I typically hate the casanova's of all sexualities who feel the need to pubically exhibit their sexuality as if the world gives two ****s.
And yes I would say the same thing if it was a heterosexual man losing his virginity to a woman in front of a live audience or a woman losing her virginity to another woman. This is more or less a performance of/for voyeurism & exhibitionism (which are fetishes which aren't particularly in the healthy category), not art. This is nothing new.
Why does modern society feel the need to expose themselves to the world? Some things should always remain private. Humans should always retain some decency.
What my elven friend said.
Doing main sexual acts in public? As shameless as monkeys!
Modifié par Kaiser Arian, 26 octobre 2013 - 10:26 .
#10
Posté 26 octobre 2013 - 10:33
kobayashi-maru
-
- Members
- 1 115 messages
Elton John is dead I get and understand your point. I actually had discussion on similar subject a few days ago. I argued that if their were only lesbians their would be less homophobia. Yes most of it comes from macho posturing being somehow threatened by gay men but a minority of gay men behave in a way that only causes problems. It's not a gay thing it's a man thing, unfortunetly some of us are pigs 
#11
Posté 26 octobre 2013 - 11:03
EarthboundNess
-
- Members
- 3 333 messages
I happen to agree that it probably shouldn't be happening for all the reasons Elton John said.
Still...
This, at least, is a good thing.
Still...
kobayashi-maru wrote...
the press had issue with virginity and the sex but not fact it was two men.
This, at least, is a good thing.
