Doubt it. More likely that they just don't care.XFG-65 wrote...
He has outscored pretty much every single Spectre member on xbox. Ask them about it, Im not making this up. It's very embarrassing for them, they don't like to talk about him.
There's a way to measure skill in the game. (Expired)
#101
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:06
#102
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:09
Saints944 wrote...
Doubt it. More likely that they just don't care.XFG-65 wrote...
He has outscored pretty much every single Spectre member on xbox. Ask them about it, Im not making this up. It's very embarrassing for them, they don't like to talk about him.
It really is true, whether you choose to believe it or not is up to you. I just find it hilarious that there's a player out there who is considerably better than all of the xbox Spectres that he has played with (doubles their scores on a regular basis, and he has played with most of the Spectres). The chances are, there are many other players out there just like that.
Modifié par XFG-65, 27 octobre 2013 - 03:10 .
#103
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:13
This reminds me when DumDum was saying the exact same thing about HardcoreSalmon. Then Salmon came in and told him to stop talking about him and giving him so much praise.XFG-65 wrote...
Saints944 wrote...
Doubt it. More likely that they just don't care.XFG-65 wrote...
He has outscored pretty much every single Spectre member on xbox. Ask them about it, Im not making this up. It's very embarrassing for them, they don't like to talk about him.
It really is true, whether you choose to believe it or not is up to you. I just find it hilarious that there's a player out there who is considerably better than all of the xbox Spectres that he has played with (doubles their scores on a regular basis, and he has played with most of the Spectres). The chances are, there are many other players out there just like that.
#104
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:13
#105
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:15
You should never give them that kind of satisfaction.Zyzimorph wrote...
I hate you
#106
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:16
Saints944 wrote...
You should never give them that kind of satisfaction.Zyzimorph wrote...
I hate you
he already knows it. I just like saying it to him.
#107
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:17
Saints944 wrote...
This reminds me when DumDum was saying the exact same thing about HardcoreSalmon. Then Salmon came in and told him to stop talking about him and giving him so much praise.
This is not the case. I'm giving you facts. I haven't even talked to dumdum, I found out from someone else.
#108
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:17
#109
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:19
#110
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:21
#111
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:21
#112
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:21
Apperently a "fact" is that he played with every spectah even though he has clearly not.XFG-65 wrote...
Saints944 wrote...
This reminds me when DumDum was saying the exact same thing about HardcoreSalmon. Then Salmon came in and told him to stop talking about him and giving him so much praise.
This is not the case. I'm giving you facts. I haven't even talked to dumdum, I found out from someone else.
#113
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:21
Azoole wrote...
@OP, many people have had their challenges frozen for significant periods of time (up to several months or more) so this invalidates the use of your equation as a means of assessing "true skill".
It's for current players.
Di-Datau wrote...
I probably did this wrong because it says 136.4331687.
Peesee manifest here.
Modifié par OperatingWookie, 27 octobre 2013 - 03:25 .
#114
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:24
Saints944 wrote...
Apperently a "fact" is that he played with every spectah even though he has clearly not.XFG-65 wrote...
Saints944 wrote...
This reminds me when DumDum was saying the exact same thing about HardcoreSalmon. Then Salmon came in and told him to stop talking about him and giving him so much praise.
This is not the case. I'm giving you facts. I haven't even talked to dumdum, I found out from someone else.
I didn't say he played with every Spectre. If you look at my earlier post closely, I said that he has played with most of them. Out of the all the ones he has played with, he has not been outscored once.
#115
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:25
OperatingWookie wrote...
Di-Datau wrote...
I probably did this wrong because it says 136.4331687.
Peesee manifest here.
136.433/4=34.108
You forgot to divide by 4. Double checking now.
That makes much more sense. Thank you.
#116
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:26
XFG-65 wrote...
I didn't say he played with every Spectre.
XFG-65 wrote...
This statement is invalid. Dumdum has wiped the floor with each and every single xbox Spectre, yet he's not a Spectre himself.
Modifié par b00g13man, 27 octobre 2013 - 03:27 .
#117
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:27
This was a fact before I corrected you.XFG-65 wrote...
Uh Cold wrote...
I played with certain people from the top 10 for N7 on xbox because they wanted to join spectre back in the day.
They weren't good enough to join and I ended up removing them from my list because they weren't reliable teammates.
Dat high N7 skill.
This statement is invalid. Dumdum has wiped the floor with each and every single xbox Spectre, yet he's not a Spectre himself.
Dammit Boog.
Also we should get a game in.
Modifié par Saints944, 27 octobre 2013 - 03:28 .
#118
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:27
What does "Divide by zero exception" mean? Is it a very exceptional skill? Yes?
#119
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:28
#120
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:29
#121
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:30
SoundWraith wrote...
I played me3mp for three thousand hours without earning any headshot medals and mixed it up by humping pancakes in between games. That makes my legacy legit right?
Yeah, that's exactly what I do as well.
Though I usually like to do that in between waves.
Modifié par XFG-65, 27 octobre 2013 - 03:30 .
#122
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:30
Di-Datau wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Di-Datau wrote...
I probably did this wrong because it says 136.4331687.
Peesee manifest here.
136.433/4=34.108
You forgot to divide by 4. Double checking now.
That makes much more sense. Thank you.
No, wait you did actually divide by 4. That means you would have scored in the 500s without the scaling factor.
Think of it as a 100% until I change the equation again.
#123
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:32
OperatingWookie wrote...
Di-Datau wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Di-Datau wrote...
I probably did this wrong because it says 136.4331687.
Peesee manifest here.
136.433/4=34.108
You forgot to divide by 4. Double checking now.
That makes much more sense. Thank you.
No, wait you did actually divide by 4. That means you would have scored in the 500s without the scaling factor.
Think of it as a 100% until I change the equation again.
Weird.
#124
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:33
dr_random wrote...
Hello, I need help with the calculation:
What does "Divide by zero exception" mean? Is it a very exceptional skill? Yes?
Calculated it wrong.
According to the stats I found on you it's not undefined.
Should be around 20.99, if I didn't mess up.
Modifié par OperatingWookie, 27 octobre 2013 - 03:34 .
#125
Posté 27 octobre 2013 - 03:34
Di-Datau wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Di-Datau wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
Di-Datau wrote...
I probably did this wrong because it says 136.4331687.
Peesee manifest here.
136.433/4=34.108
You forgot to divide by 4. Double checking now.
That makes much more sense. Thank you.
No, wait you did actually divide by 4. That means you would have scored in the 500s without the scaling factor.
Think of it as a 100% until I change the equation again.
Weird.
Makes you the oddball.





Retour en haut







