If we removed it, would the GI be less overpowered?
Modifié par OperatingWookie, 01 novembre 2013 - 02:13 .
Modifié par OperatingWookie, 01 novembre 2013 - 02:13 .
Modifié par Tokenusername, 01 novembre 2013 - 02:15 .
Modifié par Malanek999, 01 novembre 2013 - 02:18 .
mybudgee wrote...
It would be balanced if there were no damage bonuses
mybudgee wrote...
It would be balanced if there were no damage bonuses
Cyonan wrote...
mybudgee wrote...
It would be balanced if there were no damage bonuses
It would be terrible if there were no damage bonuses.
OperatingWookie wrote...
Cyonan wrote...
mybudgee wrote...
It would be balanced if there were no damage bonuses
It would be terrible if there were no damage bonuses.
The paladin does fine without any heavy damage bonuses when it comes to power damage.
lol no, don't be silly. More headless chicken bum-rushing!capn233 wrote...
So if Cloak has no damage bonus, are you going to introduce real stealth elements into the game to make it a worthwhile power?
Alien Number Six wrote...
Finally XFG makes some sense.
They were born, captured, experimented on, destroyed and discarded. When the chance presented itself I broke loose and as Joker puts it "Started killing all their guys."XFG-65 wrote...
Alien Number Six wrote...
Finally XFG makes some sense.
You never told me what happened to your five predecessors. Did you consume them?
SWkazashi wrote...
The TC ain't so OP as it is, so no, no need to change it. Also, why the heck is GI so praised i never understood...