Could Ostagar have been won?
#1
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 04:58
Does anyone have any thoughts as to why this could or could not have been possible?
#2
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:01
#3
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:04
#4
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:35
#5
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:39
#6
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:40
#7
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:43
#8
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:45
Modifié par What a Twist, 20 janvier 2010 - 05:48 .
#9
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:52
#10
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 05:54
You know, now that I think about it... Maybe loghain wanted to charge, but he got delayed.Costin_Razvan wrote...
No. It could not have been won, as proven in RTO.
#11
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 06:05
edit: and the darkspawn were coming from the woods not the ground
Modifié par MOTpoetryION, 20 janvier 2010 - 06:09 .
#12
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 06:06
Loghain: "It was a fool's battle, lost before it was begun. You are not to blame."
But who knows. Loghain stands by his decision in that the battle was completely unwinnable. Wynne also says as much. Alistair does nothing but indicate that the battle could have, should have been won.
So like everything else, believe what you want to believe. If RtO came out on time people would be singing different tunes. Alas it did not.
#13
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 06:09
Costin_Razvan wrote...
No. It could not have been won, as proven in RTO.
Haven't had the pleasure.
Suppose it's worth posting a Gaider quote related to the topic
The darkspawn forces were getting stronger with each engagement.
Loghain knew that, and knew that it wasn't going to keep being so easy.
I would say that he knew what might happen the minute Cailan made his
strategy clear: rely on the Grey Wardens to win the day. In my mind,
Loghain still wasn't certain that
he would walk away -- and if he thought that riding into the valley
could have won the battle, he probably would have done so. Whether his
belief that this couldn't happen was the truth or just his twisted
perception of it is something you can decide for yourself. Certainly
the darkspawn horde at the last battle was far bigger than anyone had
anticipated.
Anyway, I better leave thread before RTO spoilers.
#14
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 06:12
However, Ostagar was a truly lost cause. I doubt that King Cailin would have agreed to withdrawing after what 3-5 victories? No, the Darkspawn would have won. Loghain's Betrayal actually DID save Ferelden. And yet nearly destroys it in the process (as the # of Wardens are reduced, and his Paranoria of Orlais doesn't help). Why didn't Duncan say that Wardens from the Free Marches to the north had been summoned? True Orlais was closer, but....
#15
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 06:34
If not and given the apparent massive numerical superiority of the darkspawn then maybe Loghain's men would just have carved out a wedge into the horde with little effect on the enemy's morale. That wedge would then be slowly whittled down to nothing.
Guess we'll never know.
#16
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:41
Well unless everyone( dwarves,elves,other) been there it possible to won
#17
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:56
Well, even with the Dwarves+elf+human+mage armies combined it was said that the darkspawn outnumbered them at least 3 to 1. So, kinda hard for the humans to win alone. (assuming that most of the darkspawn horde were at Ostagar).
#18
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:59
Costin_Razvan wrote...
No. It could not have been won, as proven in RTO.
I don't consider claims for a single soldier proof, especially since we have opposite claims too.
#19
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:02
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Costin_Razvan wrote...
No. It could not have been won, as proven in RTO.
I don't consider claims for a single soldier proof, especially since we have opposite claims too.
I consider the word of a Honor Guard, who was a friend with the king and had every reason to hate Loghain. The words of David Gaider, and Wynne's own words. Even those of Loghain.
Either way, there is proof Ostagar could not have won. There is ABSOLUETLY NO proof it could have been won.
Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 20 janvier 2010 - 08:03 .
#20
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:07
I don't consider claims for a single soldier proof, especially since we have opposite claims too.
You obviously don't consider David Gaider's own words either, so your opinion in this matter is less than meaningless. Is that what you do? Cheer for DavidG when he says something you like and pretend his words don't exist when he says something contrary? Sounds about right.
Also, see, this was not a 'single soldier' as you so derisively put it. This was an honor guard, a FRIEND and CLOSE CONFIDANT of the King. So unless you got to be on the field with King Cailan, or spoke to someone else who was in the game, then you have no ground to stand on and, at best, are relying on the words of characters who were about as close to the battle as you were.
Wynne also says it was unwinnable, just to let you know. She simply finds Loghain's actions reprehensible.
Anyway,
I consider the word of a Honor Guard, who was a friend with the king and had every reason to hate Loghain.
He does, one of the top dialogue options, I forget which, and if you have Loghain in your party, he'll spit the word Traitor at Loghain, and Loghain will fly off the handle at him with, "At least I took my men with me when I ran, maybe you should have grown a spine and done the same."
Modifié par Vicious, 20 janvier 2010 - 08:11 .
#21
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:09
Modifié par jsachun, 20 janvier 2010 - 08:11 .
#22
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:14
Actually, Loghain had all of Ferelden's army, & the frontline army seen battling the Darkspawn was just the Grey Wardens.
Many, many times in the game it is said otherwise, though all the GW's were indeed down there. Yes, it looks like a ridiculously small force, but whatever. IMO to be completely fair there are many times when DAO can't get it's own stories straight. example, there were just GW's down there, there was Cailan's half the army down there, Loghain had the whole army but they all mysteriously disappeared post-battle since he used only his own forces and what the Queen had left to win the various civil wars, etc.
It's a mess.
#23
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:25
Vicious wrote...
Actually, Loghain had all of Ferelden's army, & the frontline army seen battling the Darkspawn was just the Grey Wardens.
Many, many times in the game it is said otherwise, though all the GW's were indeed down there. Yes, it looks like a ridiculously small force, but whatever. IMO to be completely fair there are many times when DAO can't get it's own stories straight. example, there were just GW's down there, there was Cailan's half the army down there, Loghain had the whole army but they all mysteriously disappeared post-battle since he used only his own forces and what the Queen had left to win the various civil wars, etc.
It's a mess.
I think events in DA:O being quest based & not real time based, adds to the confusion. You have no sense of time travelling. But some journeys in the map would've taken weeks if not months in real time. I think it does mention in the storyline somewhere towards the end of the game, that the whole event roughly has taken about a year in real time since Ostagar (A conversation with Wynne I think). So if you add that to the equation & the fact that Loghain is spreading false propaganda about the events at Ostagar, it does make sense.
#24
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 11:23
He made the battle plan. He was the one who had screeching hissy fits about not waiting for the reinforcements from Orlais. Why on Earth is Cailan who may be starry-eyed and glory-seeking but at least had the sense and brains to ask for help and trust the "experts" crapped on from all sides -- yet Loghain has a hundred and one excuses made for his actions and is considered a "savior"? He saved no one but himself. He torpedoed the battle far more than Cailan's recklessness ever could.
#25
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 11:30
Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 20 janvier 2010 - 11:35 .





Retour en haut







