Apologies for my earlier lack of clarification and punctuation
Modifié par mx_keep13, 04 novembre 2013 - 03:11 .
Modifié par mx_keep13, 04 novembre 2013 - 03:11 .
Si-Shen wrote...
All we know of the Maker is that he is supposed to be a "out of touch" god and as commented, pure and to be honest a bit too perfect. Maybe people just want to see something that shows it is flawed and not so perfect. Honestly I don't expect much in the game though.
Modifié par Killdren88, 03 novembre 2013 - 03:41 .
Volus Warlord wrote...
The people that want the maker as an antagonist are a bunch of misfits that project their personal issues on Dragon Age.
Modifié par The Xand, 03 novembre 2013 - 03:58 .
Because personhood is required for things like having responsibility, morality, or personal goals.Mesina2 wrote...
Who's to say Makers has to be a person, anyway?
Killdren88 wrote...
I'm gonna wager that eventaully we are gonna have to get him to be in touch again. Slapping sense into him so he can fix all the crap in the world. Then again..If Andraste is having trouble with that I doubt will make much of a difference.
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 03 novembre 2013 - 04:02 .
The Xand wrote...
Because as things stand the Maker is too pure for Dragon Age.
Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 03 novembre 2013 - 04:01 .
No one. But if we're talking about the Maker being an antagonist, we assume he's real for the purpose of the discussion.DarkDragon777 wrote...
Who says the Maker is even real?
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 03 novembre 2013 - 04:03 .
DarkDragon777 wrote...
Who says the Maker is even real?
Maria Caliban wrote...
Because personhood is required for things like having responsibility, morality, or personal goals.
You could have a Maker that was only a mindless automaton, but that suggests a person created them, which just moves the Maker back a space. You could also have a creative force of nature that acts with no understanding of its actions, but in that case, why have a god at all?
Killdren88 wrote...
That would mean confirming the existence of the Maker, which isn't going to happen.
Modifié par The Xand, 03 novembre 2013 - 04:06 .
How are demons/spirits not people?The Xand wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Because personhood is required for things like having responsibility, morality, or personal goals.
You could have a Maker that was only a mindless automaton, but that suggests a person created them, which just moves the Maker back a space. You could also have a creative force of nature that acts with no understanding of its actions, but in that case, why have a god at all?
It's possible that the gods are just more powerful, different types of demons/spirits with a level of sentience equalling or even surpassing the races of Thedas. Both the elven religion and the Chantry state that they're all holed up in the Black City anyway so that would explain their absence. Except of course Flemeth, who is an ideal candidate for Fen'Harel given that she acts exactly like your average trickster god.
In any case I think his point was that it might not be what you think. A demon perhaps.
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 03 novembre 2013 - 04:09 .
Maria Caliban wrote...
How are demons/spirits not people?The Xand wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Because personhood is required for things like having responsibility, morality, or personal goals.
You could have a Maker that was only a mindless automaton, but that suggests a person created them, which just moves the Maker back a space. You could also have a creative force of nature that acts with no understanding of its actions, but in that case, why have a god at all?
It's possible that the gods are just more powerful, different types of demons/spirits with a level of sentience equalling or even surpassing the races of Thedas. Both the elven religion and the Chantry state that they're all holed up in the Black City anyway so that would explain their absence. Except of course Flemeth, who is an ideal candidate for Fen'Harel given that she acts exactly like your average trickster god.
In any case I think his point was that it might not be what you think. A demon perhaps.
Volus Warlord wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
How are demons/spirits not people?The Xand wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Because personhood is required for things like having responsibility, morality, or personal goals.
You could have a Maker that was only a mindless automaton, but that suggests a person created them, which just moves the Maker back a space. You could also have a creative force of nature that acts with no understanding of its actions, but in that case, why have a god at all?
It's possible that the gods are just more powerful, different types of demons/spirits with a level of sentience equalling or even surpassing the races of Thedas. Both the elven religion and the Chantry state that they're all holed up in the Black City anyway so that would explain their absence. Except of course Flemeth, who is an ideal candidate for Fen'Harel given that she acts exactly like your average trickster god.
In any case I think his point was that it might not be what you think. A demon perhaps.
Incorrect # of chromosones and/or non-romancable
OperatingWookie wrote...
I disagree. Demons/spirits are complete bastards, just like the whole of all Dragon age NPCs.
There's no difference other than the locale.
Were we to take the romanceable part to effect, none but a few party members would be people.
The PC wouldn't be a person since you can't romance yourself.
The Xand wrote...
Volus Warlord wrote...
The people that want the maker as an antagonist are a bunch of misfits that project their personal issues on Dragon Age.
Or people who are dissatisfied at how jarring and out of place the Maker is in the Dragon Age world.
It's obviously some kind of primeval demon.
Modifié par JulianWellpit, 03 novembre 2013 - 04:25 .
Volus Warlord wrote...
OperatingWookie wrote...
I disagree. Demons/spirits are complete bastards, just like the whole of all Dragon age NPCs.
There's no difference other than the locale.
Were we to take the romanceable part to effect, none but a few party members would be people.
The locale is difference enough. And you're ignoring half the argument.The PC wouldn't be a person since you can't romance yourself.
Nonsense.
Modifié par Han Shot First, 03 novembre 2013 - 04:50 .
Guest_Craig Golightly_*
mx_keep13 wrote...
Why does the maker have to serve as an antagonist do we want the chantry to be wrong and go to kill a god kratos style dont think the maker should be an enemy in inquisition I think of him as a flawed all powerful diety thats not entirely good or evil and has a personality disorder