J. Reezy wrote...
Angry_Elcor wrote...
J. Reezy wrote...
Angry_Elcor wrote...
By using the argument "She isn't that way, so therefore you must be wrong."
You said it, not me.
Actually, no, I didn't. You edited the quote. That's neither necessary, nor relevant. I'm not bothered by your opinion, so please stop altering the context of what I say, simply because you don't happen to like it.
Angry_Elcor wrote...
By using the argument "She isn't that way, so therefore you must be wrong." It doesn't work like that. My opinion of what I would change is valid, for it is my own, not yours. If she has tattoos, the argument "she doesn't have tattoos" ceases to apply. If you prefer her without tattoos, that does not bother me in the slightest, expecially since we're dealing with hypotheticals.
Again...YOU said it, NOT me. That quote was unnecessary because I never said it. Because I never said it that warranted this response, "You said it, not me". As in, you're putting words in peoples' mouths. Those are no one's thoughts but yours.
You conveniently left out this part:
It makes perfect sense? How so? If that was the perfect avenue for her to reject her father, wouldn't she have done so, by now?
I'm asked what I would change. I say what I would change. You ask me why, I tell you why. You counter my reasoning by saying she doesn't have tattoos, so how could she ever be imagined to have tattoos? Except that was the very point of the thread.
Do you have opinons of what you would change? I assume so, and therefore I can have one, too. The nature of "changing" something is to make different from how it is now. I am doing that, because it is the topic of the thread.
Modifié par Angry_Elcor, 07 novembre 2013 - 04:52 .
Retour en haut
