Do tell me, then, what source this truth springs from, for which you are the avatar? The real David could stay internally consistent.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
True for some other people, not all.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Angry_Elcor wrote...
I believe you did, and most people reading back through would, as well. I don't care much, either way. If that's not what you were saying, then there was no reason to question me in the first place. As I said, it honestly doesn't bother me what your opinion is.
I understand that you are arguing for the sake of arguing, and I won't lie, I find it fun, too! But you seemed to be more reasonable than your average bear (at first) so I tried to explain myself. You weren't up for having any kind of debate, and you obviously still aren't, so that's fair. I'm pretty happy with the idea of a sexy tattoo'd Miranda, and you won't have any luck convincing me my tastes are wrong, but you can keep trying, if you really want.
Elcor, when good things exist, it's because people like me make them and have standards for them. The standards I follow would be true whether I believed in them or not.
I know. They're true, because of me.
What Would You have Changed About Your Favorite Character(s)?
#651
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:32
-
- Members
- 30 873 messages
Retour en haut
#652
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:32
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
-
- Guests
Terrible? No. That was actually very accurate. 100% accurate, as it was word-for-wordStreetMagic wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
True for some other people, not all.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Angry_Elcor wrote...
I believe you did, and most people reading back through would, as well. I don't care much, either way. If that's not what you were saying, then there was no reason to question me in the first place. As I said, it honestly doesn't bother me what your opinion is.
I understand that you are arguing for the sake of arguing, and I won't lie, I find it fun, too! But you seemed to be more reasonable than your average bear (at first) so I tried to explain myself. You weren't up for having any kind of debate, and you obviously still aren't, so that's fair. I'm pretty happy with the idea of a sexy tattoo'd Miranda, and you won't have any luck convincing me my tastes are wrong, but you can keep trying, if you really want.
Elcor, when good things exist, it's because people like me make them and have standards for them. The standards I follow would be true whether I believed in them or not.
Oh God, don't take him seriously. He's just doing a terrible impression of someone.
#653
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:33
-
- Members
- 9 230 messages
Xilizhra wrote...
Do tell me, then, what source this truth springs from, for which you are the avatar? The real David could stay internally consistent.
From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 07 novembre 2013 - 05:34 .
#654
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:34
-
- Members
- 6 185 messages
CynicalShep wrote...
Definitely tramp stamp. Stay classy, councilor.
Well, it is the classier of the two, lol.
Modifié par BioWareMod01, 07 novembre 2013 - 06:44 .
#655
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:35
-
- Members
- 30 873 messages
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
#656
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:35
Guest_StreetMagic_*
-
- Guests
J. Reezy wrote...
Terrible? No. That was actually very accurate. 100% accurate, as it was word-for-wordStreetMagic wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
True for some other people, not all.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Angry_Elcor wrote...
I believe you did, and most people reading back through would, as well. I don't care much, either way. If that's not what you were saying, then there was no reason to question me in the first place. As I said, it honestly doesn't bother me what your opinion is.
I understand that you are arguing for the sake of arguing, and I won't lie, I find it fun, too! But you seemed to be more reasonable than your average bear (at first) so I tried to explain myself. You weren't up for having any kind of debate, and you obviously still aren't, so that's fair. I'm pretty happy with the idea of a sexy tattoo'd Miranda, and you won't have any luck convincing me my tastes are wrong, but you can keep trying, if you really want.
Elcor, when good things exist, it's because people like me make them and have standards for them. The standards I follow would be true whether I believed in them or not.
Oh God, don't take him seriously. He's just doing a terrible impression of someone.
Accurate, perfect, terrible.. Same difference.
#657
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:37
-
- Members
- 9 230 messages
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
Ah, but you're so wrong Xilizhra. I'm not a villain. I'm a hero. Because I'm meaningful. Don't be absurd.
#658
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:37
-
- Members
- 15 752 messages
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
I'm sorry, what constitutes a villain here?
#659
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:38
-
- Members
- 9 230 messages
dreamgazer wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
I'm sorry, what constitutes a villain here?
Happy Post! That's Me!
Really, villainy is subjective. And circumstantial.
Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 07 novembre 2013 - 05:39 .
#660
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:38
-
- Members
- 30 873 messages
Admitted willingness to commit war crimes is a decent start, in addition to trying to restart Cerberus in-game.dreamgazer wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
I'm sorry, what constitutes a villain here?
#661
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:39
-
- Members
- 15 752 messages
[/on-topic]
#662
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:40
-
- Members
- 9 230 messages
Xilizhra wrote...
Admitted willingness to commit war crimes is a decent start, in addition to trying to restart Cerberus in-game.dreamgazer wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
I'm sorry, what constitutes a villain here?
What's a war-crime? Why is it a war-crime? Why are you right? Why am I wrong?
#663
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:40
-
- Members
- 16 356 messages
What am I reading BSN.
#664
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:40
-
- Members
- 9 230 messages
dreamgazer wrote...
I wouldn't have killed Emily Wong on Twitter.
[/on-topic]
I wouldn't have got Chobot as Allers.
#665
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:40
-
- Members
- 8 441 messages
I haven't seen him say anything about committing war crimes. I also haven't seen him make multiple death threats against other members of this board, unlike someone else I could mention...Xilizhra wrote...
Admitted willingness to commit war crimes is a decent start, in addition to trying to restart Cerberus in-game.dreamgazer wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
I'm sorry, what constitutes a villain here?
Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 07 novembre 2013 - 05:41 .
#666
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:41
-
- Members
- 23 845 messages
dreamgazer wrote...
I wouldn't have killed Emily Wong on Twitter.
[/on-topic]
This, and I wouldn't have killed off Kal'Reegar so unceremoniously. We only get to see one no-nonsense quarian soldier, and he just dies off in an email.
Either Emily or Khalisah would've been better suited to be the tag-along reporter on the Normandy. Someone, anyone who has been in the trilogy since the beginning would be preferable to the weird newcomer with the uncanny valley face.
Modifié par KaiserShep, 07 novembre 2013 - 05:43 .
#667
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:41
-
- Members
- 16 356 messages
DeinonSlayer wrote...
I also haven't seen him make multiple death threats against other members of this board, unlike someone else I could mention...
Bazinga, just mentioned that up above, rofl.
#668
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:42
-
- Members
- 30 873 messages
You advocated for killing civilians in a landing zone and claimed that rules of engagement were idiotic, to my recollection.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Admitted willingness to commit war crimes is a decent start, in addition to trying to restart Cerberus in-game.dreamgazer wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
I'm sorry, what constitutes a villain here?
What's a war-crime? Why is it a war-crime? Why are you right? Why am I wrong?
#669
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:43
Guest_StreetMagic_*
-
- Guests
KaiserShep wrote...
dreamgazer wrote...
I wouldn't have killed Emily Wong on Twitter.
[/on-topic]
This, and I wouldn't have killed off Kal'Reegar so unceremoniously. We only get to see one no-nonsense quarian soldier, and he just dies off in an email.
/Pours out a 40
#670
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:45
-
- Members
- 9 230 messages
Xilizhra wrote...
You advocated for killing civilians in a landing zone and claimed that rules of engagement were idiotic, to my recollection.MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Admitted willingness to commit war crimes is a decent start, in addition to trying to restart Cerberus in-game.dreamgazer wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
I'm sorry, what constitutes a villain here?
What's a war-crime? Why is it a war-crime? Why are you right? Why am I wrong?
No to the former, unless they were a threat. That's just wasting ammunition.
Yes to the second, but you don't actually know anything about our RoE or the logic behind it, so you're completely off the mark here. I have a feeling your RoE would be to drive toward the sick, injured animal on the side of the road. Everybody's a minsweeper once though...
And on a notional approach, why is it inherently bad? What's 'bad' about it?
Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 07 novembre 2013 - 05:45 .
#671
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:45
-
- Members
- 15 752 messages
MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
dreamgazer wrote...
I wouldn't have killed Emily Wong on Twitter.
[/on-topic]
I wouldn't have got Chobot as Allers.
Mhm. I would have hired a better (actual) VA w/o Chobot's likeness, and offered a choice between them.
(I mean, Laura Bailey was right there.)
#672
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:46
-
- Members
- 30 873 messages
Your opinion has been noted.No to the former, unless they were a threat. That's just wasting ammunition.
Yes to the second, but you don't actually know anything about our RoE or the logic behind it, so you're completely off the mark here. I have a feeling your RoE would be to drive toward the sick, injured animal on the side of the road. Everybody's a minsweeper once though...
#673
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:47
-
- Members
- 6 185 messages
MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
dreamgazer wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Perhaps, but you're still the villain. With tattoos as some kind of weak point.From heroism of course. There is an inherent structure for the hero to follow. Shepard must be the hero, otherwise he would not be the hero. And the hero must be the protagonist. If the protagonist isn't the hero, then he's not the protagonist.
I'm sorry, what constitutes a villain here?
Happy Post! That's Me!
Really, villainy is subjective. And circumstantial.
Nonsense.
Do you know why people didn't care much for TIM? It was because his villainy wasn't meaningful. Your unvillainous interpretation of villainy is quite lacking.
Tell me, Massively. Does this make you feel powerful?
#674
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:47
-
- Members
- 23 845 messages
Modifié par KaiserShep, 07 novembre 2013 - 05:48 .
#675
Posté 07 novembre 2013 - 05:48
-
- Members
- 9 230 messages
Xilizhra wrote...
Your opinion has been noted.No to the former, unless they were a threat. That's just wasting ammunition.
Yes to the second, but you don't actually know anything about our RoE or the logic behind it, so you're completely off the mark here. I have a feeling your RoE would be to drive toward the sick, injured animal on the side of the road. Everybody's a minsweeper once though...
And your opinion has been disregarded.
And I think I'm more than qualified to determine what opinions are worthwhile on this matter or not.
Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 07 novembre 2013 - 05:48 .
