You're right, it's not an accomplishment.....Br3ad wrote...
Taking an ME thread is not an accomplisment.Steelcan wrote...
Thread dominated, high fives all around plus cigars and brandy on Massively
Modifié par General TSAR, 08 novembre 2013 - 04:31 .
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Br3ad wrote...
Taking an ME thread is not an accomplisment.Steelcan wrote...
Thread dominated, high fives all around plus cigars and brandy on Massively
The Mad Hanar wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
Taking an ME thread is not an accomplisment.Steelcan wrote...
Thread dominated, high fives all around plus cigars and brandy on Massively
Yeah, that.
Modifié par rekn2, 08 novembre 2013 - 04:36 .
that sounded like a personal attackrekn2 wrote...
The Mad Hanar wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
Taking an ME thread is not an accomplisment.Steelcan wrote...
Thread dominated, high fives all around plus cigars and brandy on Massively
Yeah, that.
wont stop the dick riding anyway
Steelcan wrote...
that sounded like a personal attackrekn2 wrote...
The Mad Hanar wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
Taking an ME thread is not an accomplisment.Steelcan wrote...
Thread dominated, high fives all around plus cigars and brandy on Massively
Yeah, that.
wont stop the dick riding anyway
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
rekn2 wrote...
The Mad Hanar wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
Taking an ME thread is not an accomplisment.Steelcan wrote...
Thread dominated, high fives all around plus cigars and brandy on Massively
Yeah, that.
wont stop the dick riding anyway
If OPSEC were the concern, I'd (privately) call you out for OPSEC- it's not like you're claiming to be military intelligence and posting your picture across the internet or anything. That would be a stupid security violation. I'm challenging you on how you're conducting yourself, which amounted to a 'hey here's proof I'm better than you'll ever be, neenerneener.'MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Really, LT?MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Hi David how are you?
-unprofessional crap-
I'm all for the super-hooah appeal to the professional expertise, especially in light of David's ignorance and continual insistence otherwise, but that was just petty, unbecoming, and downright irrelevant.
David is wrong on the grounds of his poor argument- not because he's not airborn, and not because you are. Trying pull it out for an internet dick waving contest with people who don't know better is not how you go about representing your soldiers if you intend to present yourself as the military professional.
Either stop presenting yourself as an officer, or start acting like one.
Buddy, all my images are cleared. Nothing violates OPSEC or PERSEC. There's nothing incriminating or damaging in any of my images. And one has even been posted in the Army Times. They're all cleared. And I did this more in defence of my own credibility at David's rather rude challenging. And furthermore, perhaps using the images was a bit of a heated break. But nothing here was in an unprofessional manner. All were images that I've posted before.
I might tell you some other time, but it would be really missing the point now.I would like to know your past though with service.
The Mad Hanar wrote...
rekn2 wrote...
The Mad Hanar wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
Taking an ME thread is not an accomplisment.Steelcan wrote...
Thread dominated, high fives all around plus cigars and brandy on Massively
Yeah, that.
wont stop the dick riding anyway
My genuine reaction to that sentiment.
rekn2 wrote...
you crying over a personal attack...you made my day, thanks for that
Dean_the_Young wrote...
If OPSEC were the concern, I'd (privately) call you out for OPSEC- it's not like you're claiming to be military intelligence and posting your picture across the internet or anything. That would be a stupid security violation. I'm challenging you on how you're conducting yourself, which amounted to a 'hey here's proof I'm better than you'll ever be, neenerneener.'MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Really, LT?MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
Hi David how are you?
-unprofessional crap-
I'm all for the super-hooah appeal to the professional expertise, especially in light of David's ignorance and continual insistence otherwise, but that was just petty, unbecoming, and downright irrelevant.
David is wrong on the grounds of his poor argument- not because he's not airborn, and not because you are. Trying pull it out for an internet dick waving contest with people who don't know better is not how you go about representing your soldiers if you intend to present yourself as the military professional.
Either stop presenting yourself as an officer, or start acting like one.
Buddy, all my images are cleared. Nothing violates OPSEC or PERSEC. There's nothing incriminating or damaging in any of my images. And one has even been posted in the Army Times. They're all cleared. And I did this more in defence of my own credibility at David's rather rude challenging. And furthermore, perhaps using the images was a bit of a heated break. But nothing here was in an unprofessional manner. All were images that I've posted before.
Your credibility wasn't insulted, and even if it was your service history is irrelevant. You were executing an argument from authority fallacy, and boorishly at that.I might tell you some other time, but it would be really missing the point now.I would like to know your past though with service.
Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...
rekn2 wrote...
you crying over a personal attack...you made my day, thanks for that
You've held onto that EDI thread anger for so long.
Even though you got the group you were looking for...
Most impressive.
I'd report your school to the relevant watchdogs if they are still working on the "X is true because the teacher told us"are you honestly calling out every teacher youve ever had?
rekn2 wrote...
and youre a moderator using a public account so you can be an ass.
AlexMBrennan wrote...
I'd report your school to the relevant watchdogs if they are still working on the "X is true because the teacher told us"are you honestly calling out every teacher youve ever had?
Neither have expereinced the horror that Javik did.Xilizhra wrote...
Say what you will about Liara or EDI; neither of them will commit suicide over memories.
Every teacher that ever tried to claim they were correct because they were a teacher. Which would be the correct thing to do, because being a teacher doesn't make you always correct by default. Teachers tend to know more than students because they have higher levels of education and are generally more familiar with the subject matter, not because they are a teacher and all else follows.rekn2 wrote...
thats not authority fallacy....are you honestly calling out every teacher youve ever had?
Indeed, and I haven't claimed differently- it's just that the correction comes from the facts brought to bear, and not the personal identity of the one presenting those facts.some one was opening their mouth about things they dont have a clue about...some one with a clue came in and corrected them;.
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Xilizhra wrote...
Say what you will about Liara or EDI; neither of them will commit suicide over memories.
I suppose you've just atomized the whole galaxy in that scenario, so it's indeed moot.How would Mary Sue and HAL commit suicide when they've been atomized by Harby?
Yes, your side might be utterly crushed while the primitives you spend all your time decrying won.Neither have expereinced the horror that Javik did.
Liara might whine about how awful the war is, but it really could be a lot worse
Early-on shock. Javik was born into nothing but war.Judging by how Liara reacted to a Banshee, she wouldn't of been able to handle Javik's war.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 08 novembre 2013 - 04:58 .
Steelcan wrote...
Neither have expereinced the horror that Javik did.Xilizhra wrote...
Say what you will about Liara or EDI; neither of them will commit suicide over memories.
Liara might whine about how awful the war is, but it really could be a lot worse
Xilizhra wrote...
Say what you will about Liara or EDI; neither of them will commit suicide over memories.
Retour en haut