Aller au contenu

Photo

The M-96 Mattock is better than the M-99 Saber


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
77 réponses à ce sujet

#76
MaxCrushmore

MaxCrushmore
  • Members
  • 3 168 messages

prostheticlimbs wrote...

MaxCrushmore wrote...

They both suck .. there, I said it.

Aiming is a crutch .. that's why everyone should always use a Reegar ;)

@ProC - How is it possible you only have 22 URs to a maxed manifest, and 10 of them are the Lancer???

I mean, damn, that's statistically improbable .. similar happened to me with the Harrier, before the last URs were added, and the promo N7 weapons were lumped with the rest, I was somewhere around 30 URs to go w/o having one ..


Image IPB


Well, at least the next UR you roll has a %45.45 chance of being a lancer .. and if you don't get it then you'd have a %47.6 chance of rolling the time after that ...

#77
Randomical

Randomical
  • Members
  • 334 messages
Mattock is superb for the I-don't-want-to-use-OP-weapons-but-I-still-want-to-have-fun mood. I'm using it a lot with turian sentinel on Gold, and it's kinda good(I manage to outscore guys with top URs with it), though killing bosses is literally painful.

But Saber is better, of course.

#78
OniGanon

OniGanon
  • Members
  • 4 829 messages
I was mostly joking.

But also sort of not.

I mean, using the Mattock is less physically demanding than a game of Mario Party.

Are you really going to let yourselves be beaten by a kid's game?

Are you?!

Aedolon wrote...
I've never seen anyone shoot Mattock around 6/s or better with good accuracy.


Well, you don't really need to constantly shoot at max firing rate against infantry. Just click 3-5 at their head, and if they survive, you do it again.

It's against bosses where you really want the maximum DPS, and therefore need to maintain max ROF for more than a second. And bosses are huge targets, difficult to miss.