Star fury wrote...
Nope, it's a harmless remark unless you're fanatically religious.
*shrugs* To each their own.
Star fury wrote...
Nope, it's a harmless remark unless you're fanatically religious.
As someone with fairly loose religious beliefs (practically none) who runs into this kind of remark all the time, I just look at it as people sharing.Star fury wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
So you don't consider the "Hello have you looked out a window? How can anyone look at this world and think it was intentional or any being made it?" insulting to religious people?
Nope, it's a harmless remark unless you're fanatically religious.
Modifié par Obadiah, 12 novembre 2013 - 05:00 .
Ryzaki wrote...
Star fury wrote...
Nope, it's a harmless remark unless you're fanatically religious.
*shrugs* To each their own.
Star fury wrote...
I know it's shocking for you.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 12 novembre 2013 - 04:44 .
Ryzaki wrote...
Star fury wrote...
I know it's shocking for you.
That you have a different opinion nah. Not even shocking that'd you'd make that comment.
*flourishes*
Still thank ra for choices. You can agree with Ashley and be her bestest friend and earn her hard won trust and I can shoot her in the stomach and call it a day.
And nothing of value was lost.
Ryzaki wrote...
Star fury wrote...
No, it's not unless you're a militant atheist.
So you don't consider the "Hello have you looked out a window? How can anyone look at this world and think it was intentional or any being made it?" insulting to religious people?
Modifié par Ryzaki, 12 novembre 2013 - 05:12 .
iakus wrote...
Actually her phrase was "not believe in something" She's not specifying that people need to believe in her God, or any deity in particular. She's simply trying to articulate her belief that she sees something greater than herself in the universe. And wonders that others don't perceive something similar.
This is actually the key to "paragoning" her later on. Shepard can bring up that she believes in an all-powerful diety with a plan for the universe. So aliens must be part of that plan. This makes her re-evaluate her stance on them.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 12 novembre 2013 - 05:14 .
Star fury wrote...
maaaad365 wrote...
She is too rough, reminds me of a drill seargeant , not a loving mother. In ME 1 and 2 she has her hair tied and she uses no make-up. I think that's what the developers meant for her character , to be nothing more than a perfect soldier (grunt) who believes strongly in the Alliance and never questions their policy.
Ashley is "a drill sergeant" or how they are called in the ME universe - the Gunnery Chief. She's not THAT rough like this drill instructor, but still.
Modifié par Han Shot First, 12 novembre 2013 - 07:03 .
iakus wrote...
Well, the hanar revere the protheans
The protheans themselves believed in an "evolutionary imperative"
The Heretic geth worshiped the Reapers.
The turians seem to have some sort of spirit worshipping thing going on
the quarians practice a form of ancestor worship (part of their hatred for the geth came from them destroying the servers where they stored the VI's of their dearly departed)
So there's lots of stuff out there fro people to revere:)
Not to mention the discovery of the prothean cache the relay network, and the civilizations out there apparantly caused a major religious crisis on Earth. Ash still openly practicing...whatever she practices...seems to be a bit of an oddity she's a little defensive about.
Ryzaki wrote...
Still religious as for the Quarians do they believe in spirits or something?
Which is fair enough my only point was the whole It's not something to be even the least bit offended at. If she can be offended by the reverse why is my Shep not able to be offended/annoyed (I was more annoyed than offended) at the "have to believe in something cause space." remark?
Modifié par iakus, 12 novembre 2013 - 05:33 .
Modifié par Ryzaki, 12 novembre 2013 - 05:45 .
Modifié par KaiserShep, 12 novembre 2013 - 06:47 .
KaiserShep wrote...
I'm an atheist and I had no issues with her beliefs. It's not as if they're browbeat into the player. Now, if Ashley went all Westboro Baptist and started spouting off nonsense like God hates Xenos, then it would be a different story.
Han Shot First wrote...
Star fury wrote...
maaaad365 wrote...
She is too rough, reminds me of a drill seargeant , not a loving mother. In ME 1 and 2 she has her hair tied and she uses no make-up. I think that's what the developers meant for her character , to be nothing more than a perfect soldier (grunt) who believes strongly in the Alliance and never questions their policy.
Ashley is "a drill sergeant" or how they are called in the ME universe - the Gunnery Chief. She's not THAT rough like this drill instructor, but still.
The Gunnery Chief appears to be Mass Effect's equivalent of the Gunnery Sergeant rank, and while the character in that imagine was a Gunnery Sgt, that rank isn't exclusive to Drill Instructors. In combat units Gunnery Sergeants typically are the operations chief in a company and occasionally platoon sergeants. (the senior NCO in a platoon.)
Ashley most likely served in a similar role. She doesn't appear to have been an Drill Instructor at any point at least.
1) You don't call "Hello, how can you look at all this and not believe in something?" not preaching? I think you need to review what "preaching" means. Also, IDK if you remember, but in ME3 in one of the scenes that takes place if you shoot her, she says "I hope the Reapers send you to hell." Kaidan isn't as vindictive as that, even if you don't ever visit him in the hospital.Star fury wrote...
It was totally innocent. Ash wasn't preaching, she wasn't telling anybody that they would burn in hell, if they didn't believe.silverexile17s wrote...
"Hello? How can you look out there and not believe in something?"
".....because I believe not to believe in any deities?"Not a problem.silverexile17s wrote...
How so? She's still stubbornNot a problem. Since then having religious beliefs is a flaw?silverexile17s wrote...
she's still devotely religioussilverexile17s wrote...
she's still hard-lined "the world is black and white" opinionated.
It's only your opinion & it's not a problem.silverexile17s wrote...
The only thing different is her casual dress and her hairstyle - and she still tends to wear armor on missions.
Which is a bad thing?
Make a constructive quote for once.Star fury wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
Wrong. This is a war where, again, all life as we know it is at risk. There isn't time for this bull -- you either trust your friends and comrads, or you don't. You either admit your mistakes and resolve them now, or forever hold your peace, since you probably won't get any second chances here.klarabella wrote...
It tells me that these are characters in a shallow story who act nothing like real people would.silverexile17s wrote...
Kaidan was able to admit that he should have realized that Shepard wouldn't do this without good reasons. Garrus joined Shepard without knowing. So did Tali. Wrex greated Shepard without debate. And Liara was the one that gave Shepard to Cerberus in the first place. Everyone in the old squad took that risk, because even though they didn't know the reasons, they knew Shepard, and knew that Shepard would only do this for good reasons. And upon reflection, Kaidan was able to admit and accept this too. The only one that doesn't is Ashley. That doesn't tell you something?
Shepard actually did all this without good reasons. It's why I find ME2 so painful to play through.
And the handwave "I knew you for a few weeks 2 years ago and just know you are infallible and awesome" doesn't fly with me.
The Collectors took four colonies by the time Shepard went to Freedom's Progress. Then there were three more taken -- Ferris Fields, New Canton, and Horizon. Alltogether, at least seven colonies - a millon humans in total - were taken by the Collectors. You can look at that number and say "nope, you didn't have a good reason"?! Wow doesn't even cover that.
Oh, it was enough to warrent stealing the Normandy from the Citadel and infiltrating the Terminus Systems to follow Saren and Sovergien, but not enough to warrent follwoing Shepard against giant bugs that she saw herself, and was nearly killed by? How the hell does that make any sense what-so-ever? Even Kaidan, when looking back on it, realizes that he Should have trusted that Shepard must have had good reasons and that he should have trusted his/her judgement.
My eyes are bleeding!
Right there -- you said biological definition, as if you think all life follows our definitoions. Since when was biological definition the only definition in an infinate galaxy? Intelligence and sentiance are the only things required of life. Ideals like what you're saying? They border on racisim -- life doesn't have hardline definitions. It can take whatever shape or form it can, be it organic or synthetic.Necanor wrote...
silverexile17s wrote...
Intelectual capacity is LIFE. The only requirement living beings need is the abilaty to think. To make their own concious choices. Killing them is the same as killing a living being. Sure, lots of people don't know this -- hell, the quarians attacked Rannoch because they didn't know the geth weren't remote-controled Reaper-drones.
But playing from Shepard's POV, you do know, via Legion, that the geth are living beings.
And if all you're going to do is talk about the geth, go to a fourm where they're talking about the geth. Don't clutter a completely unrelated topic with this.
What? No, by a biological definition of life, Geth and all other robots, no matter how well programmed, aren't alive. Intelectual capacity isn't the only requirement to be considered alive. Ironically, it turns out that the Geth made themselves remote controlled Reaper drones when they're rightful masters showed up.
I'm clutteirng the topic? Well now, that's ironic.