The Mad Hanar wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
The Mad Hanar wrote...
I just have a few really simple questions to people who are against the Circle.
Do you feel it is really responsible to allow mages to roam free and do exactly as they please? If yes, why?
I feel like this question varies from person to person. I am against the Circle, as it is now, however if we are given the chance to change it, then I am all for it.
If, and I'm not saying this is your viewpoint, but it is a popular one, the mages were allowed full and complete control of the Circle and they were able to come and go as they choose, then wouldn't that be the same thing as allowing them to do as they please whenever they want to?
More or less, when you simplify it like that.
It is a very complicated question you pose, and my answer evolves constantly from listening to both templars and mages that form this forum. To answer you though, this is what I feel could work:
I would have a Circle run by the mages that functions and works in tandem with the Templar Order. Whatever the future of mages, I will definitely have the templars as a part of that. The Circle would work like an arm of the Chantry, similar to the Order.
Someone else posed the theory of having some Loyalist mages enfolded into the Seekers or Templar Order. I find that it would help to foster some measure of community among the "jailors" and the "jailed". Plus it would help to end the useless "Us versus Them" mentality.
Modifié par eluvianix, 21 novembre 2013 - 07:35 .