BSN Read Only Changes
#501
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 14 novembre 2013 - 10:44
Guest_Puddi III_*
#502
Posté 14 novembre 2013 - 10:57
This change doesn't really effect you.Filament wrote...
Maybe they just wanted to consolidate their site, my god. So much wine.
#503
Posté 14 novembre 2013 - 11:04
Filament wrote...
Maybe they just wanted to consolidate their site, my god. So much wine.
Can't tell if serious or.....
#504
Posté 14 novembre 2013 - 11:06
#505
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 14 novembre 2013 - 11:21
Guest_Puddi III_*
I've used all the things they said they're removing but I won't lose sleep if they're gone, no. But even for those who would, all the cries that they just need to "come clean" I really think are a little crass and premature at best. I don't know the full extent of the changes yet but it must be because bioware is cheap, lazy and/or hate certain sectors of the site, is what it says. You really don't have the grounds to make that claim IMO.luna1124 wrote...
This change doesn't really effect you.Filament wrote...
Maybe they just wanted to consolidate their site, my god. So much wine.
#506
Posté 14 novembre 2013 - 11:53
Notice you don't have any Projects on your account.Filament wrote...
I've used all the things they said they're removing but I won't lose sleep if they're gone, no. But even for those who would, all the cries that they just need to "come clean" I really think are a little crass and premature at best. I don't know the full extent of the changes yet but it must be because bioware is cheap, lazy and/or hate certain sectors of the site, is what it says. You really don't have the grounds to make that claim IMO.luna1124 wrote...
This change doesn't really effect you.Filament wrote...
Maybe they just wanted to consolidate their site, my god. So much wine.
Modifié par Sundance31us, 14 novembre 2013 - 11:53 .
#507
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 12:55
Excuse me, I did not say any of the things you just wrote here. I never said any of them. O_oFilament wrote...
I've used all the things they said they're removing but I won't lose sleep if they're gone, no. But even for those who would, all the cries that they just need to "come clean" I really think are a little crass and premature at best. I don't know the full extent of the changes yet but it must be because bioware is cheap, lazy and/or hate certain sectors of the site, is what it says. You really don't have the grounds to make that claim IMO.luna1124 wrote...
This change doesn't really effect you.Filament wrote...
Maybe they just wanted to consolidate their site, my god. So much wine.
#508
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 01:19
Guest_Puddi III_*
It's more one thing that implies the others, but they've all been said here, more or less. And if you weren't making any of those assumptions, I guess...luna1124 wrote...
Excuse me, I did not say any of the things you just wrote here. I never said any of them. O_oFilament wrote...
I've used all the things they said they're removing but I won't lose sleep if they're gone, no. But even for those who would, all the cries that they just need to "come clean" I really think are a little crass and premature at best. I don't know the full extent of the changes yet but it must be because bioware is cheap, lazy and/or hate certain sectors of the site, is what it says. You really don't have the grounds to make that claim IMO.luna1124 wrote...
This change doesn't really effect you.Filament wrote...
Maybe they just wanted to consolidate their site, my god. So much wine.
This comment doesn't really effect you.
#509
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 01:25
Guest_Puddi III_*
I've downloaded a few, haha. It seemed a bit redundant with the nexus site. I suppose if you have 400 of them it would be upsetting, granted. That is an investment. Being more personally affected doesn't give anyone special insight into the reason bioware did this, however... especially when we don't even know what 'this' is really.Sundance31us wrote...
Notice you don't have any Projects on your account.
We've been suspecting changes to the BSN were in the pipeline for a long time now, as I recall.
#510
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 01:27
#511
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 01:38
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Lol I need to see thatInquisitor Recon wrote...
You know what this reminds me of? That robot in Fallout 3 that amputated the leg of that woman who broke her toe.
#512
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 01:50
As stated several times in this thread...Nexus doesn't support Mass Effect mods.Filament wrote...
I've downloaded a few, haha. It seemed a bit redundant with the nexus site.
Played this the other day.J. Reezy wrote...
Lol I need to see thatInquisitor Recon wrote...
You know what this reminds me of? That robot in Fallout 3 that amputated the leg of that woman who broke her toe.
Andy amputated Beatrice's leg and she bled to death; it's already happened by the time the PC arrives.
#513
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 02:27
#514
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 02:55
Kidding aside, I would like to hear more about these new features after the fallout.
#515
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 03:00
#516
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 03:33
spirosz wrote...
She should probably update the OP, tbh.
#517
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:28
Next year, you can only post if you have a google+ account.mybudgee wrote...
Google +
#518
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:34
Mr.House wrote...
Next year, you can only post if you have a google+ account.mybudgee wrote...
Google +
The year after, you can't post unless you have nice things to say about BW/EA or their products. The year after, it's five cents per post.
#519
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:36
#520
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:39
And the ocasional holiday deal. 20 dollars for unlimited posting.Ravensword wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
Next year, you can only post if you have a google+ account.mybudgee wrote...
Google +
The year after, you can't post unless you have nice things to say about BW/EA or their products. The year after, it's five cents per post.
#521
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:39
I say weeks.spirosz wrote...
You two say years, I say months.
#522
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:44
FFS. No.Mr.House wrote...
70,000 is a good sample size in fact so you're wrong.
A poll without a random sample is statistically useless if you want to generalise to the larger population.
The sample size is *irrelevant*.
Please, please read these before you say anything else about polling.
http://srmo.sagepub....ethods/n526.xml
http://srmo.sagepub....ethods/n469.xml
#523
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:45
It is though, this thread has been open for a day and it only has 21 pages. If a thread about gender politics or playersexuality stayed open that long it would have at least 60 pages.spirosz wrote...
Can we use "it's just the minority" complaining on BSN (lololol ironic lololol), or is it too soon?
#524
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:47
bobobo878 wrote...
It is though, this thread has been open for a day and it only has 21 pages. If a thread about gender politics or playersexuality stayed open that long it would have at least 60 pages.spirosz wrote...
Can we use "it's just the minority" complaining on BSN (lololol ironic lololol), or is it too soon?
Of course. When EAware says they are dedicated to the things that make the BSN a great place w/ lots of intelligent discussion and whatnot, they're talking about the bolded sentence.
#525
Posté 15 novembre 2013 - 04:50
If you're a statistician or a scientist then the first thing you should be doing is dismissing nonrepresentative, non random sampling with these sorts of questions as completely junk.Buggirl70 wrote...
Yes, I agree, it has weight. Being the statistician/scientist that I am, but I'm not convinced that the method is entirely sound. Random polls in places like gaming sites (and websites in general) are notoriously unreliable. But it seems across gaming sites the results are similar in regard to the ending, that can't be discounted as part of a general consensus.Mr.House wrote...
The fact that it's a good sample gives it alot of weight.
edit: just wanted to add there are several kinds of bias these sorts of polls can have, but I won't bore you!
Self-selection bias? Errors in the question wording? None of that rings alarm bells?





Retour en haut




