David7204 wrote...
The game is irrelevant. What's relevant is someone claiming a 'militant and collectivized' society must automatically deem sex worthless unless it leads to children. That's simply not true in the slightest.
The Soviets under Stalin believed in procreation for the expressed means of creating a larger population base to draw on for industrial and military purposes.
The ****s believed in procreation for the expressed purpose of expanding Aryan genes and increasing the pool of soldiers for the Whermacht to draw upon and create the Aryan super-state. Procreation for non-Aryans was actively discouraged to prevent muddling of the Aryan gene pool, so much so that **** Germany was considered ahead of its time in contraception, actually paying non-Aryan citizens who married to wrap it on their wedding night.
Imperial Japan in the Second World War actively encouraged women to have as many children as possible to serve as the future of the military and the divine Emperor during the Second World War. Propaganda went so far as to say that the most powerful weapon in the IJM was the womb.
The ChiComs under Mao believed in procreation for the expressed purpose of creating a massive wave of reservist soldiers in their army.
The North Koreans have expressly discouraged procreation unless it is means of service to the state (which is ironic considering that they are huge contributors to sex trafficking all across the world).
It seems to hold true for the vast majority of militant and collectivist societies of the past century.
Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 18 novembre 2013 - 03:01 .