177 réponses à ce sujet

[The Elder King]

Spectre slayer...

Like I said he's gone on the record and said he doesn't like playersexual(as recently as a few days ago) and doesn't want to give us the ability to romance everyone, and again JP( Jonathan Perry) said I wouldn't say anyone can romance anyone but there's certain characters who fancy a certain type.

Which is all in the link I provided in one of my previous posts after, posting it in the new approval system thread.

There's going maybe 4 romancable companions and some npc's that won't all be bi sexual to give us more options, it has nothing to do with preference since some characters that I play as are BI rather it's based on everything they've said over the last year.

If there'll be 4 companions LI and two NPC, there'll still be six LI. 
Though the fact that Gaider stated that he doesn't want to make all companions LI doesn't mean that there'll not be 6 companion LI. The number of companions is nine. 9=/=6.

Modifié par hhh89, 18 novembre 2013 - 02:18 .

[Br3admax]

eluvianix wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

/Implying that you being happy meant that everyone was. Implying that the romances were even done well for DA ][.

Certainly none of the sexual orientations were left out in terms of satisfaction, aside from asexuals who are romantically attracted to only women (unless I'm missing something else).

I am sorry, but what?:blink:

Asexuality, Xil, is a lack of seuxality. Two, I'm more concerned with the lack of actual quality romance content than if I can be straight or gay. None of things matter to me because I am no the character that I am playing. I do not put myself in video games to live out my fantasies. I just want to see how it goes and judge it as I see fit. You saw it as quality product, I did not. 

[General TSAR]

eluvianix wrote...
Sometimes, it makes me feel like banging my head against a brick wall.

I know that feel bro, we all know that feel.

[JerZey CJ]

The Woldan wrote...

JerZeyCJ2 wrote...

The Woldan wrote...

Siegdrifa wrote...

I care only to try a big tall horned woman as PC.  : )

I wouldn't get my hopes up, judging by the artwork the fem Qunari seem to have the normal female body model (height and physique) + horns. 

They seem to be at least a little bit taller. Even if the comics don't show a big difference, I highly doubt BW would make them the same height and build.

Haven''t read the comics, I was talking about this concept art: 

Right, that one, saw it before but forgot about it. Did it just come out? Do we know if the person on knee is a Qunari or not? If it is human, it appeals to be a male and it seems like the Inquisitor might be a few inches taller if he was standing up. Also, that Inquisitor looks pretty badass, the armor kind of reminds me of Chantry robes.

[dreamgazer]

Xilizhra wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

And the vast majority of people who will end up buying the game will be straight (due to the fact that the majority of people are straight). With that knowledge, straight romances will be (more than likely) the priority if there aren't enough resources to please everyone.

Why? That wasn't an issue in DA2. It certainly wouldn't have to be here.

Quite arguable. 

Certainly it wasn't an issue of orientation, the context that we were discussing.

Depends on how you're referring to orientation.

The issue isn't with accessibility, obviously.  It's with credibility, and how it relates to universally player-sexual options. 

[David7204]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

General TSAR wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

The Soviets under Stalin believed in procreation for the expressed means of creating a larger population base to draw on for industrial and military purposes.

The Nazi's believed in procreation for the expressed purpose of expanding Aryan genes and increasing the pool of soldiers for the Whermacht to draw upon and create the Aryan super-state. Procreation for non-Aryans was actively discouraged to prevent muddling of the Aryan gene pool, so much so that Nazi Germany was considered ahead of its time in contraception, actually paying non-Aryan citizens who married to wrap it on their wedding night.

Imperial Japan in the Second World War actively encouraged women to have as many children as possible to serve as the future of the military and the divine Emperor during the Second World War. Propaganda went so far as to say that the most powerful weapon in the IJM was the womb.

The ChiComs under Mao believed in procreation for the expressed purpose of creating a massive wave of reservist soldiers in their army.

The North Koreans have expressly discouraged procreation unless it is means of service to the state (which is ironic considering that they are huge contributors to sex trafficking all across the world).

It seems to hold true for the vast majority of militant and collectivist societies of the past century.

The drone just got curb stomped by logic.

It's not even logic. It's history.

First of all, this is very shoddy logic. For the simple reason that societies encourging a large population is a vastly different thing from societies claiming sex has no merit except procreation.

Secondly, you should consider what those socieities have in common besides being collectivist and militent.

[General TSAR]

My Brain is committing Harakiri.

Modifié par General TSAR, 18 novembre 2013 - 02:21 .

[Br3admax]

David7204 wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

General TSAR wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

The Soviets under Stalin believed in procreation for the expressed means of creating a larger population base to draw on for industrial and military purposes.

The Nazi's believed in procreation for the expressed purpose of expanding Aryan genes and increasing the pool of soldiers for the Whermacht to draw upon and create the Aryan super-state. Procreation for non-Aryans was actively discouraged to prevent muddling of the Aryan gene pool, so much so that Nazi Germany was considered ahead of its time in contraception, actually paying non-Aryan citizens who married to wrap it on their wedding night.

Imperial Japan in the Second World War actively encouraged women to have as many children as possible to serve as the future of the military and the divine Emperor during the Second World War. Propaganda went so far as to say that the most powerful weapon in the IJM was the womb.

The ChiComs under Mao believed in procreation for the expressed purpose of creating a massive wave of reservist soldiers in their army.

The North Koreans have expressly discouraged procreation unless it is means of service to the state (which is ironic considering that they are huge contributors to sex trafficking all across the world).

It seems to hold true for the vast majority of militant and collectivist societies of the past century.

The drone just got curb stomped by logic.

It's not even logic. It's history.

First of all, this is very shoddy logic. For the simple reason that societies encourging a large population is a vastly different thing from societies claiming sex has no merit except procreation.

Secondly, you should consider what those socieities have in common besides being collectivist and militent.

1. Not really the point. Again. Useless also does not mean without merit.

2. They didn't even have similar ideology. Nazis and communist are in fact not allies, and Japan was an imperial state. Really, you have no point. 

Modifié par Br3ad, 18 novembre 2013 - 02:32 .

[Siegdrifa]

The Woldan wrote...

Siegdrifa wrote...

I care only to try a big tall horned woman as PC.  : )

I wouldn't get my hopes up, judging by the artwork the fem Qunari seem to have the normal female body model (height and physique) + horns. 

Height is not that hard to change, it take juste a few scall operation here and there, it doesn't need new specific animation for some kind of minor change that keep the bone structure well in place. Lot of MMO do it.

Of course if Bioware never intended to do it then as you said, i wouldn't get my hopes up.
But from DA2 size of qunari, i would expect female qunari to be from half a head to one head and half taller than average human size, but it's only my personnal estimation of what their size should be.

Modifié par Siegdrifa, 18 novembre 2013 - 02:30 .

[Xilizhra]

Asexuality, Xil, is a lack of seuxality. Two, I'm more concerned with the lack of actual quality romance content than if I can be straight or gay. None of things matter to me because I am no the character that I am playing. I do not put myself in video games to live out my fantasies. I just want to see how it goes and judge it as I see fit. You saw it as quality product, I did not.

Mkay.

Depends on how you're referring to orientation.

The issue isn't with accessibility, obviously. It's with credibility, and how it relates to universally player-sexual options.

Give Gaider more resources to make more romance options to fix that issue if you so desire.

My Brain is committing Harakiri.

That shouldn't take long.

[JerZey CJ]

General TSAR wrote...

My Brain is committing Harakiri.

How did you fit a Tanto in there?

[Hellion Rex]

@Br3ad, what was word you used that got censored?

[2Pac]

This thread has given me cancer..

[Xilizhra]

eluvianix wrote...

@Br3ad, what was word you used that got censored?

The political party of the Third Reich.

[Hellion Rex]

Xilizhra wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

@Br3ad, what was word you used that got censored?

The political party of the Third Reich.

Gotcha. Thank you.

Modifié par eluvianix, 18 novembre 2013 - 02:26 .

[General TSAR]

Xilizhra wrote...

My Brain is committing Harakiri.

That shouldn't take long.

Yeah, just don't have sex with my body after I'm brain-dead.

Oh wait, I'm a male and an adult.

Modifié par General TSAR, 18 novembre 2013 - 02:26 .

[Steelcan]

I think that was an attack on someone's intelligence, a personal attack and a reportable offense.

[Hellion Rex]

General TSAR wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

My Brain is committing Harakiri.

That shouldn't take long.

Yeah, just don't have sex with my body after I'm brain-dead.

Oh wait, I'm a male and an adult, safe from you at least. 

Really dude?

[dreamgazer]

Give Gaider more resources to make more romance options to fix that issue if you so desire.

... eh? Or the writing and resources available could, y'know, handle sexuality with more practicality.

[Giant ambush beetle]

JerZeyCJ2 wrote...


Right, that one, saw it before but forgot about it. Did it just come out? Do we know if the person on knee is a Qunari or not? If it is human, it appeals to be a male and it seems like the Inquisitor might be a few inches taller if he was standing up. Also, that Inquisitor looks pretty badass, the armor kind of reminds me of Chantry robes.

That the person in the robes might be another Qunari seems unlikely to me, no horns and no other indicators. I guess its a human, and if he wasn't kneeling I'd say he would be at least as tall as the inquisitor. Knees are at the same height even though the robe dudes lower leg is angled. The male Qunari was MUCH taller than the human male so the difference between male and female Qunari is going to be massive. 
She also has the body build of a slim female human. So far I'm not impressed.

About the outfit, thats clothes, not armor. Looks cool but I wouldn't want my warrior wear that as armor as it seems to have zero protectiveness.

Modifié par The Woldan , 18 novembre 2013 - 02:29 .

[Br3admax]

dreamgazer, this thread is much in need of a Kelly gif.

[Hellion Rex]

Br3ad wrote...

dreamgazer, this thread is much in need of a Kelly gif.

I beg of you, please don't!!!!!:crying:

[General TSAR]

eluvianix wrote...

Really dude?

(Shrug)

I need a vacation from BSN.

Modifié par General TSAR, 18 novembre 2013 - 02:31 .

[Xilizhra]

Yeah, just don't have sex with my body after I'm brain-dead.

Oh wait, I'm a male and an adult.

I'll have sex with the desire demon I summon before I implant it into your body to turn it into a revenant.

... eh? Or the writing and resources available could, y'know, handle sexuality with more practicality.

How so?

[Ravensword]

Xilizhra wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

@Br3ad, what was word you used that got censored?

The political party of the Third Reich.

You mean the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei?