1192 réponses à ce sujet

[Lady Lionheart]

Couldn't my Inquisitor teach him? XD

[Steelcan]

deleted

Modifié par Steelcan, 20 novembre 2013 - 04:47 .

[Leoroc]

Fenris didnt really know about sex either. A loving relationship with Cole could certainly lead to a physical one, like as exists in many samesex relationships as one or both partners are having their first experience. It could be great and offer some nice character growth, and be a nice change from the man**** that was Zevran =p.

[Hellion Rex]

Leoroc wrote...

Fenris didnt really know about sex either. A loving relationship with Cole could certainly lead to a physical one, like as exists in many samesex relationships as one or both partners are having their first experience. It could be great and offer some nice character growth, and be a nice change from the man**** that was Zevran =p.

But Fenris did not regress to a child like mentality. Cole has a crap ton of issues to deal with as well. For one, what in the world is he?
Edit: And Zevran's romance was awesome.

Modifié par eluvianix, 20 novembre 2013 - 04:45 .

[Steelcan]

Merrill was a child mentally, Cole is just the obvious next step.

[Hellion Rex]

Steelcan wrote...

Merrill was a child mentally, Cole is just the obvious next step.

She seemed more innocent, but that does not equate to being childlike necessarily.

[Steelcan]

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Merrill was a child mentally, Cole is just the obvious next step.

She seemed more innocent, but that does not equate to being childlike necessarily.

"Ohh look at the nice spirit", I bet letting him each me blood magic is gonna be fine and won't backfire in any way shape or form"

[citation needed]

[Nalia_dArnise]

David Gaider wrote...
...you know that Cole is functionally a child, right?

Heh. Alistar war functionally a child. Merril and Fenris-- too. Especially Fenris. So Cole_LI isn't something strange, it's rather tradition.

[Hellion Rex]

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Merrill was a child mentally, Cole is just the obvious next step.

She seemed more innocent, but that does not equate to being childlike necessarily.

"Ohh look at the nice spirit", I bet letting him each me blood magic is gonna be fine and won't backfire in any way shape or form"

[citation needed]

Naive, not childlike.

[Pzykozis]

Nalia_dArnise wrote...

David Gaider wrote...
...you know that Cole is functionally a child, right?

Heh. Alistar war functionally a child. Merril and Fenris-- too. Especially Fenris. So Cole_LI isn't something strange, it's rather tradition.

There's a difference between brooding whining and being abit stroppy sometimes and being as developed emotionally as a 5 year old. Cole is the latter (Not to mention not even human etc.)

[Steelcan]

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Merrill was a child mentally, Cole is just the obvious next step.

She seemed more innocent, but that does not equate to being childlike necessarily.

"Ohh look at the nice spirit", I bet letting him each me blood magic is gonna be fine and won't backfire in any way shape or form"

[citation needed]

Naive, not childlike.

naive, physically younger looking with the wide eyes and small body, doesn't get innuendo, lots of things like that.

[Lady Lionheart]

Even though he probably wouldn't be a LI (GERHDAMNIT!!! D':< ) he'd be a really cool character with an awesome story arch.
So make them a companion and then I'll shut my fat piehole. (...and a LI please I'm not giving in 'til I get what I want!1!!1!!!) >

[Hellion Rex]

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Merrill was a child mentally, Cole is just the obvious next step.

She seemed more innocent, but that does not equate to being childlike necessarily.

"Ohh look at the nice spirit", I bet letting him each me blood magic is gonna be fine and won't backfire in any way shape or form"

[citation needed]

Naive, not childlike.

naive, physically younger looking with the wide eyes and small body, doesn't get innuendo, lots of things like that.

She hasn't been around humans before and I highly doubt the Dalish indulge in such innuendo.

[Hellion Rex]

Xbox360Girl1321 wrote...

Even though he probably wouldn't be a LI (GERHDAMNIT!!! D':< ) he'd be a really cool character with an awesome story arch.
So make them a companion and then I'll shut my fat piehole. (...and a LI please I'm not giving in 'til I get what I want!1!!1!!!) >

As for his LI status, I would not hold my breath if Gaider's post is anything to go by.

[Steelcan]

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Merrill was a child mentally, Cole is just the obvious next step.

She seemed more innocent, but that does not equate to being childlike necessarily.

"Ohh look at the nice spirit", I bet letting him each me blood magic is gonna be fine and won't backfire in any way shape or form"

[citation needed]

Naive, not childlike.

naive, physically younger looking with the wide eyes and small body, doesn't get innuendo, lots of things like that.

She hasn't been around humans before and I highly doubt the Dalish indulge in such innuendo.

Right.... the Dalish don't do innunedo...

I'm actually gonna need a citation on that one

[David Gaider]

Yeah, one should not really equate naiveté (or whatever other personality characteristics you consider immature) with Cole. It's explicitly stated that Cole sees people in the tower having sex, and doesn't understand it--there's no concept of arousal, not to mention the social under-development he otherwise displays.

If that doesn't impact you, and you really think you could "teach" him to understand these things... ummm, okay. Shine on, you crazy diamonds.

[Lady Lionheart]

@Pzykozis

Well my Inquisitor won't be human either.

[ScarMK]

Xbox360Girl1321 wrote...

@Pzykozis

Well my Inquisitor won't be human either.

You have no idea what he means by "human", do you?

[Hellion Rex]

simfamSP wrote...

David Gaider wrote...

Xbox360Girl1321 wrote...
I really want Cole as a companion and LI

...you know that Cole is functionally a child, right?

Ten minutes in the BSN and he'll know all he needs to know

That made me cackle! So very true.

[Nalia_dArnise]

Pzykozis wrote...

Nalia_dArnise wrote...

David Gaider wrote...
...you know that Cole is functionally a child, right?

Heh. Alistar war functionally a child. Merril and Fenris-- too. Especially Fenris. So Cole_LI isn't something strange, it's rather tradition.

There's a difference between brooding whining and being abit stroppy sometimes and being as developed emotionally as a 5 year old. Cole is the latter (Not to mention not even human etc.)

And what about Fenris? He lost his memory and the most of remembered life was a "weapon" without will. In DA2 he is also a child functionally.
I don't want Cole as LI, I was only surprised that it was told about age. I thought that Cole have a bit another emotions because of his supernatural nature.

[Hellion Rex]

ScarMK wrote...

Xbox360Girl1321 wrote...

@Pzykozis

Well my Inquisitor won't be human either.

You have no idea what he means by "human", do you?

I mean, do we even know if this Cole is even "alive", much less human?

Modifié par eluvianix, 20 novembre 2013 - 05:05 .

[esper]

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Merrill was a child mentally, Cole is just the obvious next step.

She seemed more innocent, but that does not equate to being childlike necessarily.

"Ohh look at the nice spirit", I bet letting him each me blood magic is gonna be fine and won't backfire in any way shape or form"

[citation needed]

Naive, not childlike.

naive, physically younger looking with the wide eyes and small body, doesn't get innuendo, lots of things like that.

She hasn't been around humans before and I highly doubt the Dalish indulge in such innuendo.

Right.... the Dalish don't do innunedo...

I'm actually gonna need a citation on that one

They properly don't do human innuendo, but have their own, properly wood relateed... and Merril is actually quite interested in sex. She wants to understand the dirty jokes so she knows that they entail, hint in act 1 that she is attracted to Hawke (banter with Aveline), looks through Anders' books for 'dirty' spells and thinks the qunari are easy on the eye.

So she definitly knows what sex is.

[Br3admax]

David Gaider wrote...

Yeah, one should not really equate naiveté (or whatever other personality characteristics you consider immature) with Cole. It's explicitly stated that Cole sees people in the tower having sex, and doesn't understand it--there's no concept of arousal, not to mention the social under-development he otherwise displays.

If that doesn't impact you, and you really think you could "teach" him to understand these things... ummm, okay. Shine on, you crazy diamonds.

Lol. I wonder why we're still debating about wanting to romance someone with the mind of a child. 

[Silfren]

Nalia_dArnise wrote...

Pzykozis wrote...

Nalia_dArnise wrote...

David Gaider wrote...
...you know that Cole is functionally a child, right?

Heh. Alistar war functionally a child. Merril and Fenris-- too. Especially Fenris. So Cole_LI isn't something strange, it's rather tradition.

There's a difference between brooding whining and being abit stroppy sometimes and being as developed emotionally as a 5 year old. Cole is the latter (Not to mention not even human etc.)

And what about Fenris? He lost his memory and the most of remembered life was a "weapon" without will. In DA2 he is also a child functionally.
I don't want Cole as LI, I was only surprised that it was told about age. I thought that Cole have a bit another emotions because of his supernatural nature.

I really don't think you understand what being functionally a child means.  The description does NOT apply to Alistair, Merrill, or Fenris at all.