1192 réponses à ce sujet

[razmatazz]

Wasn't the memo that was sent to the artists was for Aveline to not be too attractive (in other words, not a 10) or somesuch? I don't recall BW saying she was ugly, either. Definitely not a 10, either, (she's an 8 at best, imho) though, so success on the artists' part.

I actually enjoyed helping Aveline hook up with Donnic in that quest. She was just so awkward, it made me both laugh and sympathize with her.

[Killdren88]

Galsic wrote...

Wasn't the memo that was sent to the artists was for Aveline to not be too attractive (in other words, not a 10) or somesuch? I don't recall BW saying she was ugly, either. Definitely not a 10, either, (she's an 8 at best, imho) though, so success on the artists' part.

I actually enjoyed helping Aveline hook up with Donnic in that quest. She was just so awkward, it made me both laugh and sympathize with her.

I thought Aveline was rather beautiful. More so than Isabela.

[Hazegurl]

eluvianix wrote...

Hazegurl wrote...

I can't romance Varric, he's too dudebro for me to see him as a possible LI. Had enough of forced friendships with crazy mages so the Tevinter is out. Also had enough of undead spirit people things so no way to Cole.

That leaves Cullen, Warden, and perhaps Iron bull for me. If these three options are out then I guess my Inquisitor will get no lovin'

Keep the faith!
And Gaider pretty much nixed the whole Cole romance idea a couple of pages ago.

Thank the Maker! If it is the same Cole from the book I want the option to kill it.

[Thrillian]

FemHawke FTW wrote...

Watched 'Road House' recently and now all I can think of is DAI needing a male LI voiced by Sam Elliot.

I can't possibly convey how much I agree with this post!  Sam Elliot!  His voice is amazing and I have thought so since I first saw Tombstone.  His voice is spine tingling!

[razmatazz]

I see the appeal with Aveline. She didn't have the major hang-ups the other DA][ LIs had. But not everyone can be attracted to a person who seemingly tempts (and potentially causes) trouble at every turn.

That said, my guess is my Inquisitor's going to be so knee-deep in chaotic situations that a down-to-earth LI might be just what he/she needs to keep him/her grounded (like Aveline!)

[Killdren88]

Galsic wrote...

I see the appeal with Aveline. She didn't have the major hang-ups the other DA][ LIs had. But not everyone can be attracted to a person who seemingly tempts (and potentially causes) trouble at every turn.

That said, my guess is my Inquisitor's going to be so knee-deep in chaotic situations that a down-to-earth LI might be just what he/she needs to keep him/her grounded (like Aveline!)

Not gonna lie I was upset I could not romance her. I would have been more than glad to assit her with moving on from her husband.

[Silfren]

FemHawke FTW wrote...

Watched 'Road House' recently and now all I can think of is DAI needing a male LI voiced by Sam Elliot.

Screw the voice-only bit!  I would be totally for having Sam Elliott in DA as a self-insert!  Especially per his Golden Compass persona.

Make it happen, Allan!  Use the force your blood magic if you have to!  This needs to be a thing in Inquisition! 

Modifié par Silfren, 21 novembre 2013 - 04:15 .

[razmatazz]

Killdren88 wrote...


I would have been more than glad to assit her with moving on from her husband.

So...helping her hook up with Donnic doesn't count?

[Killdren88]

Galsic wrote...

Killdren88 wrote...


I would have been more than glad to assit her with moving on from her husband.

So...helping her hook up with Donnic doesn't count?

Gah...pardon the misuse of words. I would jump at the moment to help her with that romantically. But I was juast as content in helping her get with Donnic.

[Thrillian]

Galsic wrote...

Killdren88 wrote...


I would have been more than glad to assit her with moving on from her husband.

So...helping her hook up with Donnic doesn't count?

  Actually, I did find this to be instrumental to her moving on from Wesley,  but also I found it to be one of my favorite companion missions.  I loved Aveline's naivete, and my Hawke making comments along the way. lol. It was great.

[ladyofpayne]

Nalia_dArnise wrote...

But I understand what you mean. "I'm so impudent and pert, but deep inside I'm disappointed romantic. If you endure my roughness, I become more kind, told you my very very sad story from the past... And when you stanch my tears, I said I love you and so on".
You know. I'm sure, that it will be shouting at all forums, that the character is whiner and 'we want have true maaaaan'.

No you don't . By personality I mean Jaime is strong and active man with good semse of humor. He isn't whiny person. And he isn't disssapoineted romantic no way. He won't tell you sad stor of his past. Unless we both will be in a hot bath and he will be drink.

[KC_Prototype]

Killdren88 wrote...

Galsic wrote...

Wasn't the memo that was sent to the artists was for Aveline to not be too attractive (in other words, not a 10) or somesuch? I don't recall BW saying she was ugly, either. Definitely not a 10, either, (she's an 8 at best, imho) though, so success on the artists' part.

I actually enjoyed helping Aveline hook up with Donnic in that quest. She was just so awkward, it made me both laugh and sympathize with her.

I thought Aveline was rather beautiful. More so than Isabela.

Isabella was hotter but Aveline should of been a third option for Male Hawke, it really sucks that she was only a tease.

[Thrillian]

KC_Prototype wrote...

Killdren88 wrote...

Galsic wrote...

Wasn't the memo that was sent to the artists was for Aveline to not be too attractive (in other words, not a 10) or somesuch? I don't recall BW saying she was ugly, either. Definitely not a 10, either, (she's an 8 at best, imho) though, so success on the artists' part.

I actually enjoyed helping Aveline hook up with Donnic in that quest. She was just so awkward, it made me both laugh and sympathize with her.

I thought Aveline was rather beautiful. More so than Isabela.

Isabella was hotter but Aveline should of been a third option for Male Hawke, it really sucks that she was only a tease.

She wasn't only a tease for male Hawke, my girl greatly appreciated her character!

[KC_Prototype]

Pseudocognition wrote...

KC_Prototype wrote...

I hope everybody knows I'm talking about male inquisitor romance options, so I mean what females are available.

mayhap you would have better luck if you rephrased the thread title to "romance option for male inquisitors"

also what hotdogbsg said

yeah, my bad.

[TeamLexana]

ladyofpayne wrote...

Nalia_dArnise wrote...

But I understand what you mean. "I'm so impudent and pert, but deep inside I'm disappointed romantic. If you endure my roughness, I become more kind, told you my very very sad story from the past... And when you stanch my tears, I said I love you and so on".
You know. I'm sure, that it will be shouting at all forums, that the character is whiner and 'we want have true maaaaan'.

No you don't . By personality I mean Jaime is strong and active man with good semse of humor. He isn't whiny person. And he isn't disssapoineted romantic no way. He won't tell you sad stor of his past. Unless we both will be in a hot bath and he will be drink.

Honestly if he did tell me of his past great love being his SISTER, I'd puke. 

Then arrest him for Treason and haul him off to the Starks. 

[Hazegurl]

It must really suck for people who wanted to romance Aveline but couldn't. She was strong, dependable, grounded, not caught up in the messy debates, and had a real job.

[KC_Prototype]

Silfren wrote...

KC_Prototype wrote...

I hope everybody knows I'm talking about male inquisitor romance options, so I mean what females are available.

To be even more specific, you mean what romance options are available for straight guy playthroughs, since of course plenty of male gamers will want to romance male companions, and females won't be available just for male gamers.  But I'm just being pedantic.

Thread drift is going to happen.  It's natural for people to start discussing the LIs in general.  But, even though the phrase "male inquisitor romance options," is technically ambitious, most times it's meant as "men you can romance," and that's how it's naturally going to be taken.  It's certainly the more obvious, straightforward meaning. 

Of course, you did spell it out in your OP, but I know I managed to miss the clarification the first time I read it.  Or, a lot of people just plain aren't reading the OP at all, lol.  But yeah, you should probably change the title to say "Who are going to be the female romance options," if that's what you actually want to discuss, because your OP title specifies exactly the opposite.  You'd be better off changing it than coming into the thread to post that people are talking about the OP wrong.

Sorry about that, didn't realize it when I was writing it. I changed the title and I'm cool with people talking about their wants in LIs I was just unsure if they understood the title.

[KC_Prototype]

Hazegurl wrote...

It must really suck for people who wanted to romance Aveline but couldn't. She was strong, dependable, grounded, not caught up in the messy debates, and had a real job.

I saw her as a better option the second time through for my mage Hawke. I don't really care too much for Merrill.

[Spectre slayer]

Thrillho_82 wrote...

Spectre slayer wrote...

Thrillho_82 wrote...

All of the romance options will be available for the male protag. Sorry to burst anyones bubble, but as of yet we can deduce from various statements from developers that all of the LIs will be available to every protag.

While some may feel this is unrealistic (who gives a crap?) the dev's have clearly indicated that they don't have the resources to develop an incredibly wide arrange of characters, so out of fairness what they do have access to will be player sexual. Boo hoo to those who are against it!

Nope the devs have actually said the complete opposite of what you're saying, and no this has nothing to to do with preference or whether or not is realistic or anything like that since my characters are usually BI or Straight.

And for the record both Gaider and I are against player sexual but not bi sexual since they are 2 different things entirely.

2) I dislike the idea of every character being sexually available to the player. Not that it cheapens them, necessarily, but it would lend itself towards their objectification.

Use this link here
dgaider.tumblr.com/post/40361886357/on-romances-in-games

Jonathan Perry interview 

Finally, how will romancing work in the game? Is it the same kind of deal as previous BioWare games, or can anyone romance anyone?

Jp I wouldn't say that anyone can romance anyone, but there will certainly be characters who fancy a certain type of person more than another.

We haven't really been able to comment on how many of your followers will be 'romance-able' or who will be 'romance-able', but we do have a whole lot of interesting combinations.

Romance is a really important part of our storytelling, and we really want to give the player a lot of options there.

www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-16239-Dragon-Age--Inquisition-Interview-%E2%80%93-Jonathan-Perry-Talks-Sex--Mounts--Demons-and-Destruction.htm


social.bioware.com/%20http:/social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/371/index/17572518/1#17573080

 Ah. So that’s what all the anonymous tweets shouting “biphobic” at me this past weekend have been about.For those who’ve decided the “playersexual” comment is something I came up with, I’ll just say it’s not. 

There are a group of DA fans who insist on calling the DA2 romances that, however— hence why I said “whatever you want to call them” and put it in quotes. I don’t agree with the term, but there you have it. 

In terms of bisexuality and our romances, I’ve discussed them numerous times before. Here, or here, for instance. 

My saying that I don’t think players have the right to romance any character no matter who they’re playing is not the same as saying that bisexuality doesn’t exist or that BioWare will suddenly remove bisexual romances from our games.

As I’ve said before, my ideal would be to have an array of sexualities— including bisexuality— if there were enough romance plots to go around. Failing that, having bisexual romances is still the fairest way to go.

So I hear what you’re saying (as in the plural “you”), and I see I also typo’d “playersexual” in my original post— sorry about that— but the anger here is misdirected. Plain and simple.

dgaider.tumblr.com/

At no point did your quotes say that the LI's would not be available to PC's of both genders.

"As I’ve said before, my ideal would be to have an array of sexualities— including bisexuality— if there were enough romance plots to go around. Failing that, having bisexual romances is still the fairest way to go."  Exactly what I said in my initial post.

"Jp I wouldn't say that anyone can romance anyone, but there will certainly be characters who fancy a certain type of person more than another.

We haven't really been able to comment on how many of your followers will be 'romance-able' or who will be 'romance-able', but we do have a whole lot of interesting combinations."

This does not mean that the LI's will not be available to each gender but may depend on the actions of the PC.

I am well aware that David Gaider would prefer to have a multitude of sexual orientations, but as my initial post says, he is willing to say that given the financial and companion limitation, the best compromise is to have all of the LI's available to every protag regardless of gender.

Sigh he's personally said he doesn't want to make all of the character's sexually available to the player, and Jonathan Perry was asked point blank will they be playersexual and he said no to be more specific they have/fancy a certain type.

What Gaider literary said was that bi sexuality would be the comprise and the fairest option, not playersexual if he can't give people varied sexualitys. And no what you literally said was they will all be playersexual no matter what boo hoo if you're against it lol he's against it so how exactly does that work for you?

Also those are only a portion of the quotes, and you say it's the opposite but it's not that's just your personal belief based on what, I really have no idea since as he said not having playersexual li's isn't the same as getting rid of the bi sexual li's.

You seem to act like they have to make them all available as LI's but they don't need to do so, nor does he want to, so aslong as they have a good number of companion and npc LI's then what exactly is the problem.

Romances themselves are different now and are more based on interactions and your actions than in other games and the approval system is gone from DAI, you can't spam gifts or say a certain thing and get +5 or more like you used to, nor are they content gated, which is what they meant but of course you would think otherwise.

As for possible male li companion or npc options let's see 

Bald Elf Guy mage 
Grey Warden with beard
Cullen
Iron Bull

Modifié par Spectre slayer, 21 novembre 2013 - 05:13 .

[razmatazz]

Thrillho_82 wrote...


  Actually, I did find this to be instrumental to her moving on from Wesley,  but also I found it to be one of my favorite companion missions. 

I'm tempted to say it was my favorite quest in the whole game.  I found it both incredibly amusing and touching and was a nice change of pace from other quests that tended to be rather weighty, if not downright depressing.

I loved Aveline's naivete, and my Hawke making comments along the way. lol. It was great.

Actually, after three (?) years, she was just really rusty.

Anyway, the only real problem I had with Anders, Merril, and Fenris was that I actually found it kind of difficulty to relate to their particular hang-ups, Anders' in particular.  I can only hope that, if the next set of LIs have hang-ups, they're a little more down-to-earth.

[Allan Schumacher]

Thrillho_82 wrote...

Galsic wrote...

Killdren88 wrote...


I would have been more than glad to assit her with moving on from her husband.

So...helping her hook up with Donnic doesn't count?

  Actually, I did find this to be instrumental to her moving on from Wesley,  but also I found it to be one of my favorite companion missions.  I loved Aveline's naivete, and my Hawke making comments along the way. lol. It was great.

That and being REDONKULOUSLY ADORABLE!! <3<3<3<3<3<3<3

I'm sorry....  who? :innocent:

I'm tempted to say it was my favorite quest in the whole game.  I found
it both incredibly amusing and touching

BECAUSE ADORABLE!!!

Modifié par Allan Schumacher, 21 novembre 2013 - 04:51 .

[Killdren88]

KC_Prototype wrote...

Killdren88 wrote...

I thought Aveline was rather beautiful. More so than Isabela.

Isabella was hotter but Aveline should of been a third option for Male Hawke, it really sucks that she was only a tease.

Eh..opinions. Isabela wasn't bad looking just the sultry pirate wasn't an eye opener for me.

[Thrillian]

Spectre slayer wrote...

Thrillho_82 wrote...

Spectre slayer wrote...

Thrillho_82 wrote...

All of the romance options will be available for the male protag. Sorry to burst anyones bubble, but as of yet we can deduce from various statements from developers that all of the LIs will be available to every protag.

While some may feel this is unrealistic (who gives a crap?) the dev's have clearly indicated that they don't have the resources to develop an incredibly wide arrange of characters, so out of fairness what they do have access to will be player sexual. Boo hoo to those who are against it!

Nope the devs have actually said the complete opposite of what you're saying, and no this has nothing to to do with preference or whether or not is realistic or anything like that since my characters are usually BI or Straight.

And for the record both Gaider and I are against player sexual but not bi sexual since they are 2 different things entirely.

2) I dislike the idea of every character being sexually available to the player. Not that it cheapens them, necessarily, but it would lend itself towards their objectification.

Use this link here
dgaider.tumblr.com/post/40361886357/on-romances-in-games

Jonathan Perry interview 

Finally, how will romancing work in the game? Is it the same kind of deal as previous BioWare games, or can anyone romance anyone?

Jp I wouldn't say that anyone can romance anyone, but there will certainly be characters who fancy a certain type of person more than another.

We haven't really been able to comment on how many of your followers will be 'romance-able' or who will be 'romance-able', but we do have a whole lot of interesting combinations.

Romance is a really important part of our storytelling, and we really want to give the player a lot of options there.

www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-16239-Dragon-Age--Inquisition-Interview-%E2%80%93-Jonathan-Perry-Talks-Sex--Mounts--Demons-and-Destruction.htm


social.bioware.com/%20http:/social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/371/index/17572518/1#17573080

 Ah. So that’s what all the anonymous tweets shouting “biphobic” at me this past weekend have been about.For those who’ve decided the “playersexual” comment is something I came up with, I’ll just say it’s not. 

There are a group of DA fans who insist on calling the DA2 romances that, however— hence why I said “whatever you want to call them” and put it in quotes. I don’t agree with the term, but there you have it. 

In terms of bisexuality and our romances, I’ve discussed them numerous times before. Here, or here, for instance. 

My saying that I don’t think players have the right to romance any character no matter who they’re playing is not the same as saying that bisexuality doesn’t exist or that BioWare will suddenly remove bisexual romances from our games.

As I’ve said before, my ideal would be to have an array of sexualities— including bisexuality— if there were enough romance plots to go around. Failing that, having bisexual romances is still the fairest way to go.

So I hear what you’re saying (as in the plural “you”), and I see I also typo’d “playersexual” in my original post— sorry about that— but the anger here is misdirected. Plain and simple.

dgaider.tumblr.com/

At no point did your quotes say that the LI's would not be available to PC's of both genders.

"As I’ve said before, my ideal would be to have an array of sexualities— including bisexuality— if there were enough romance plots to go around. Failing that, having bisexual romances is still the fairest way to go."  Exactly what I said in my initial post.

"Jp I wouldn't say that anyone can romance anyone, but there will certainly be characters who fancy a certain type of person more than another.

We haven't really been able to comment on how many of your followers will be 'romance-able' or who will be 'romance-able', but we do have a whole lot of interesting combinations."

This does not mean that the LI's will not be available to each gender but may depend on the actions of the PC.

I am well aware that David Gaider would prefer to have a multitude of sexual orientations, but as my initial post says, he is willing to say that given the financial and companion limitation, the best compromise is to have all of the LI's available to every protag regardless of gender.

Sigh he's personally said he doesn't want to make all of the character's sexually available to the player, and Jonathan Perry was asked point blank will they be playersexual and he said no to be more specific they have a certain type.

What Gaider literary said was that bi sexuality would be the comprise an the fairest not playersexual if he can't give people varied sexualitys.

Those are only a portion of the quotes, you say it's the opposite but it's not that's just your personal belief based on what, I really have no idea.

Romances themselves are different now and are more based on interactions and your actions than in other games and the approval system is gone from DAI, you can't spam gifts or say a certain thing and get +5 or more like you used to, nor are they content gated.

As for possible male li companion or npc options let's see 

Bald Elf Guy mage 
Grey Warden with beard
Cullen
Iron Bull

I love it when people "sigh".

From you earlier quotes, I didn't see that JP said that each LI wouldn't be available to each player based on gender but be available based on "type", sorry but "type" doesn't spell out gender to me, it say based on the type of person the protag is, ie. based on actions and personality.

"
What Gaider literary said was that bi sexuality would be the comprise an the fairest not playersexual if he can't give people varied sexualitys."

Yeah Exactly what I said in that Gaider would prefer a multitude of sexualities, but based on their budget, making every LI available to every PC regardless of gender is the easiest and fairest approach.

[Thrillian]

Allan Schumacher wrote...

Thrillho_82 wrote...

Galsic wrote...

Killdren88 wrote...


I would have been more than glad to assit her with moving on from her husband.

So...helping her hook up with Donnic doesn't count?

  Actually, I did find this to be instrumental to her moving on from Wesley,  but also I found it to be one of my favorite companion missions.  I loved Aveline's naivete, and my Hawke making comments along the way. lol. It was great.

That and being REDONKULOUSLY ADORABLE!! <3<3<3<3<3<3<3

I'm sorry....  who? :innocent:

I'm tempted to say it was my favorite quest in the whole game.  I found
it both incredibly amusing and touching

BECAUSE ADORABLE!!!

Also that!

[Spectre slayer]

Thrillho_82 wrote...

Spectre slayer wrote...

Thrillho_82 wrote...

Spectre slayer wrote...

Thrillho_82 wrote...

All of the romance options will be available for the male protag. Sorry to burst anyones bubble, but as of yet we can deduce from various statements from developers that all of the LIs will be available to every protag.

While some may feel this is unrealistic (who gives a crap?) the dev's have clearly indicated that they don't have the resources to develop an incredibly wide arrange of characters, so out of fairness what they do have access to will be player sexual. Boo hoo to those who are against it!

Nope the devs have actually said the complete opposite of what you're saying, and no this has nothing to to do with preference or whether or not is realistic or anything like that since my characters are usually BI or Straight.

And for the record both Gaider and I are against player sexual but not bi sexual since they are 2 different things entirely.

2) I dislike the idea of every character being sexually available to the player. Not that it cheapens them, necessarily, but it would lend itself towards their objectification.

Use this link here
dgaider.tumblr.com/post/40361886357/on-romances-in-games

Jonathan Perry interview 

Finally, how will romancing work in the game? Is it the same kind of deal as previous BioWare games, or can anyone romance anyone?

Jp I wouldn't say that anyone can romance anyone, but there will certainly be characters who fancy a certain type of person more than another.

We haven't really been able to comment on how many of your followers will be 'romance-able' or who will be 'romance-able', but we do have a whole lot of interesting combinations.

Romance is a really important part of our storytelling, and we really want to give the player a lot of options there.

www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-16239-Dragon-Age--Inquisition-Interview-%E2%80%93-Jonathan-Perry-Talks-Sex--Mounts--Demons-and-Destruction.htm


social.bioware.com/%20http:/social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/371/index/17572518/1#17573080

 Ah. So that’s what all the anonymous tweets shouting “biphobic” at me this past weekend have been about.For those who’ve decided the “playersexual” comment is something I came up with, I’ll just say it’s not. 

There are a group of DA fans who insist on calling the DA2 romances that, however— hence why I said “whatever you want to call them” and put it in quotes. I don’t agree with the term, but there you have it. 

In terms of bisexuality and our romances, I’ve discussed them numerous times before. Here, or here, for instance. 

My saying that I don’t think players have the right to romance any character no matter who they’re playing is not the same as saying that bisexuality doesn’t exist or that BioWare will suddenly remove bisexual romances from our games.

As I’ve said before, my ideal would be to have an array of sexualities— including bisexuality— if there were enough romance plots to go around. Failing that, having bisexual romances is still the fairest way to go.

So I hear what you’re saying (as in the plural “you”), and I see I also typo’d “playersexual” in my original post— sorry about that— but the anger here is misdirected. Plain and simple.

dgaider.tumblr.com/

At no point did your quotes say that the LI's would not be available to PC's of both genders.

"As I’ve said before, my ideal would be to have an array of sexualities— including bisexuality— if there were enough romance plots to go around. Failing that, having bisexual romances is still the fairest way to go."  Exactly what I said in my initial post.

"Jp I wouldn't say that anyone can romance anyone, but there will certainly be characters who fancy a certain type of person more than another.

We haven't really been able to comment on how many of your followers will be 'romance-able' or who will be 'romance-able', but we do have a whole lot of interesting combinations."

This does not mean that the LI's will not be available to each gender but may depend on the actions of the PC.

I am well aware that David Gaider would prefer to have a multitude of sexual orientations, but as my initial post says, he is willing to say that given the financial and companion limitation, the best compromise is to have all of the LI's available to every protag regardless of gender.

Sigh he's personally said he doesn't want to make all of the character's sexually available to the player, and Jonathan Perry was asked point blank will they be playersexual and he said no to be more specific they have a certain type.

What Gaider literary said was that bi sexuality would be the comprise an the fairest not playersexual if he can't give people varied sexualitys.

Those are only a portion of the quotes, you say it's the opposite but it's not that's just your personal belief based on what, I really have no idea.

Romances themselves are different now and are more based on interactions and your actions than in other games and the approval system is gone from DAI, you can't spam gifts or say a certain thing and get +5 or more like you used to, nor are they content gated.

As for possible male li companion or npc options let's see 

Bald Elf Guy mage 
Grey Warden with beard
Cullen
Iron Bull

I love it when people "sigh".

From you earlier quotes, I didn't see that JP said that each LI wouldn't be available to each player based on gender but be available based on "type", sorry but "type" doesn't spell out gender to me, it say based on the type of person the protag is, ie. based on actions and personality.

"
What Gaider literary said was that bi sexuality would be the comprise an the fairest not playersexual if he can't give people varied sexualitys."

Yeah Exactly what I said in that Gaider would prefer a multitude of sexualities, but based on their budget, making every LI available to every PC regardless of gender is the easiest and fairest approach.

This is getting nowhere since you're way to biased and disregarding everything in front of you which states the opposite of what you're saying.

Again did you miss the part where they asked perry if anyone can romance anyone and he said I wouldn't say they can romance anyone but they have certain type but you keep saying otherwise even when it's right there where everyone can see.

Again Gaider doesn't want playersexual nor does he want everyone to be sexually available to the protagonist, and that if he can't give varied sexualitys like Straight, Gay, Lesbian, Bi he'll go with BI SEXUAL LI'S which is what he's calling the fairest option not what you're saying.

You're arguing with them due to your extreme bias and rejecting what's in front of your eyes which really doesn't make sense, those quotes and links are there for a reason. If i were to post everything they would take up to much space.

Also i'm not arguing with having varied sexualitys or having bi sexual characters, i'm arguing against playersexual with the Quote from the writers and devs, why are you arguing with them and me.

Modifié par Spectre slayer, 21 novembre 2013 - 05:37 .