A match made in heaven.:innocent:JusticarFlareon wrote...
Sebastian, Alistair, Cullen, a very holy threesome.
At least until we corrupt them.
A match made in heaven.:innocent:JusticarFlareon wrote...
Sebastian, Alistair, Cullen, a very holy threesome.
Plaintiff wrote...
Yes, it's super realistic that so few people would be open to homosexual relationships in a setting where people regularly date outside their own species.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
ME3 did S/S relationships better then DA2 and was more realistic.
Who gives a screaming **** about 'realism'? The entire point of fiction, especially sci-fi and fantasy fiction, is that it is different from reality.
Besides which, in reality, history documents several societies where homosexuality and bisexuality were much more common and accepted. So the notion that having four bisexuals in one group of acquaintances is "unrealistic" is uninformed at best, if not outright fallacious.
101ezylonhxeT wrote...
Plaintiff wrote...
Yes, it's super realistic that so few people would be open to homosexual relationships in a setting where people regularly date outside their own species.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
ME3 did S/S relationships better then DA2 and was more realistic.
Who gives a screaming **** about 'realism'? The entire point of fiction, especially sci-fi and fantasy fiction, is that it is different from reality.
Besides which, in reality, history documents several societies where homosexuality and bisexuality were much more common and accepted. So the notion that having four bisexuals in one group of acquaintances is "unrealistic" is uninformed at best, if not outright fallacious.
Sorry i just find everyone in my party being bisexual stupid and that's never going to change. I prefer ME3's approach much better
eluvianix wrote...
They have people who actually believe that tripe here on the BSN?Silfren wrote...
I wonder if the same people who insist that DA2's handling of relationships was unrealistic are the same people who complain that PoCs can't be in Thedas because there were no PoCs in the medieval ages at all, anywhere, ever, and yet are again the same people who say that we don't need "realistic" explanations for the weirdness of elven genetics or darkspawn or even magic itself, because fantasy!
Seriously, this argument works both ways. You can't use realism as an argument for the one if not also the other. But it's EXTREMELY telling, the way that people get irrationally and disproportionately upset over the inclusion of LGBT content (or PoCs, because it's the same damend argument either way). To get that upset about it says a great deal more about those person's personal agendas than anything else.
Modifié par Silfren, 26 novembre 2013 - 12:54 .
misoretu9 wrote...
And I completely disagree about Samantha. She had far less speaking dialogue than any other romance option, and lacked important scenes, like meeting-up on citadel (which, again, every other LI had).
In fact, IIRC she had more speaking dialogue with male character.
It showed that the focus was placed on "steamy" bed scene, not on romance development, completely the opposite to Steve's. Whose sexuality was treated with respect, while as I mentioned before, Traynor was mainly a tease for male character.
How is it stupid? It might not be as realistic as how you think it should be, but it is hardly a stupid choice on the part of the developer.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
Plaintiff wrote...
Yes, it's super realistic that so few people would be open to homosexual relationships in a setting where people regularly date outside their own species.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
ME3 did S/S relationships better then DA2 and was more realistic.
Who gives a screaming **** about 'realism'? The entire point of fiction, especially sci-fi and fantasy fiction, is that it is different from reality.
Besides which, in reality, history documents several societies where homosexuality and bisexuality were much more common and accepted. So the notion that having four bisexuals in one group of acquaintances is "unrealistic" is uninformed at best, if not outright fallacious.
Sorry i just find everyone in my party being bisexual stupid and that's never going to change. I prefer ME3's approach much better
Modifié par hhh89, 26 novembre 2013 - 12:24 .
Ryzaki wrote...
101ezylonhxeT wrote...
Plaintiff wrote...
Yes, it's super realistic that so few people would be open to homosexual relationships in a setting where people regularly date outside their own species.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
ME3 did S/S relationships better then DA2 and was more realistic.
Who gives a screaming **** about 'realism'? The entire point of fiction, especially sci-fi and fantasy fiction, is that it is different from reality.
Besides which, in reality, history documents several societies where homosexuality and bisexuality were much more common and accepted. So the notion that having four bisexuals in one group of acquaintances is "unrealistic" is uninformed at best, if not outright fallacious.
Sorry i just find everyone in my party being bisexual stupid and that's never going to change. I prefer ME3's approach much better
Yes the ME3 where straight male Shep's had 6 options, gay FemSheps has 4, gay male Sheps had 2 and straight FemSheps had 2 cause 2 of her LIs were either invalidated or got a case of the dead.
Clearly something to aspire to. /s
HolySilfren wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
They have people who actually believe that tripe here on the BSN?Silfren wrote...
I wonder if the same people who insist that DA2's handling of relationships was unrealistic are the same people who complain that PoCs can't be in Thedas because there were no PoCs in the medieval ages at all, anywhere, ever, and yet are again the same people who say that we don't need "realistic" explanations for the weirdness of elven genetics or darkspawn or even magic itself, because fantasy!
Seriously, this argument works both ways. You can't use realism as an argument for the one if not also the other. But it's EXTREMELY telling, the way that people get irrationally and disproportionately upset over the inclusion of LGBT content (or PoCs, because it's the same damend argument either way). To get that upset about it says a great deal more about those person's personal agendas than anything else.
Yes. Not to take this off the LGBT topic, but yes, unfortunately, yes they do. The number of people who think that it would be TOTALLY unrealistic to have PoC people in Thedas because Medieval Europe didn't have them, is staggering.
Here's some interesting commentary on that whole attitude, if you're interested. I was linked to it just last night.
I find your generalization as well as your preferred approach to be stupid. So I guess we're even.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
Plaintiff wrote...
Yes, it's super realistic that so few people would be open to homosexual relationships in a setting where people regularly date outside their own species.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
ME3 did S/S relationships better then DA2 and was more realistic.
Who gives a screaming **** about 'realism'? The entire point of fiction, especially sci-fi and fantasy fiction, is that it is different from reality.
Besides which, in reality, history documents several societies where homosexuality and bisexuality were much more common and accepted. So the notion that having four bisexuals in one group of acquaintances is "unrealistic" is uninformed at best, if not outright fallacious.
Sorry i just find everyone in my party being bisexual stupid and that's never going to change. I prefer ME3's approach much better
Hahahaha, I have corrupted two out of the three. Now, I just need Cullen.eluvianix wrote...
A match made in heaven.:innocent:JusticarFlareon wrote...
Sebastian, Alistair, Cullen, a very holy threesome.
At least until we corrupt them.
IMHO both romances even though short were done wellRed by Full Metal Jacket wrote...
misoretu9 wrote...
And I completely disagree about Samantha. She had far less speaking dialogue than any other romance option, and lacked important scenes, like meeting-up on citadel (which, again, every other LI had).
In fact, IIRC she had more speaking dialogue with male character.
It showed that the focus was placed on "steamy" bed scene, not on romance development, completely the opposite to Steve's. Whose sexuality was treated with respect, while as I mentioned before, Traynor was mainly a tease for male character.
Have you done Steve's romance? It's pretty short and underwhelming in the main game. I think one of the devs confirmed that Steve and Samantha had the same number of "romantic" dailogue lines.
101ezylonhxeT wrote...
Theres room for improvement but its still better then DA2's approach.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 26 novembre 2013 - 12:27 .
Modifié par Ryzaki, 26 novembre 2013 - 12:31 .
eluvianix wrote...
How is it stupid? It might not be as realistic as how you think it should be, but it is hardly a stupid choice on the part of the developer.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
Plaintiff wrote...
Yes, it's super realistic that so few people would be open to homosexual relationships in a setting where people regularly date outside their own species.101ezylonhxeT wrote...
ME3 did S/S relationships better then DA2 and was more realistic.
Who gives a screaming **** about 'realism'? The entire point of fiction, especially sci-fi and fantasy fiction, is that it is different from reality.
Besides which, in reality, history documents several societies where homosexuality and bisexuality were much more common and accepted. So the notion that having four bisexuals in one group of acquaintances is "unrealistic" is uninformed at best, if not outright fallacious.
Sorry i just find everyone in my party being bisexual stupid and that's never going to change. I prefer ME3's approach much better
Modifié par 101ezylonhxeT, 26 novembre 2013 - 12:31 .
Its stupid because theres no way in hell that every person you meet up with that becomes a part of your party just HAPPENS to be bisexual its ridicules and unrealistic
Modifié par Ryzaki, 26 novembre 2013 - 12:32 .
Ryzaki wrote...
ME3 had LIs with crap dialogue in comparison to others (until they rectified that with Citadel DLC) and development.
I really don't think ME3 is anything to aspire to whatsoever in the LI department. They invalidate some romances, and many romances just have poor development compared to others.
I wonder if most of the people saying ME3 had romances to aspire to played a straight male Shep.
eluvianix wrote...
Kaidan's gay romance was great, IMO.
Modifié par Ryzaki, 26 novembre 2013 - 12:33 .
Ryzaki wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
Kaidan's gay romance was great, IMO.
It's okay but it's mostly the female romance with pronoun switches and some scenes taken out.
M25105 wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
M25105 wrote...
So now even the npcs have to worry about political correctness?
Yup. Ain't it grand?
Political correctness kills the soul of diversity.
eluvianix wrote...
Different strokes, my dear. To be honest, I was just glad to finally have a romance option in the game.
you and me botheluvianix wrote...
HolySilfren wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
They have people who actually believe that tripe here on the BSN?Silfren wrote...
I wonder if the same people who insist that DA2's handling of relationships was unrealistic are the same people who complain that PoCs can't be in Thedas because there were no PoCs in the medieval ages at all, anywhere, ever, and yet are again the same people who say that we don't need "realistic" explanations for the weirdness of elven genetics or darkspawn or even magic itself, because fantasy!
Seriously, this argument works both ways. You can't use realism as an argument for the one if not also the other. But it's EXTREMELY telling, the way that people get irrationally and disproportionately upset over the inclusion of LGBT content (or PoCs, because it's the same damend argument either way). To get that upset about it says a great deal more about those person's personal agendas than anything else.
Yes. Not to take this off the LGBT topic, but yes, unfortunately, yes they do. The number of people who think that it would be TOTALLY unrealistic to have PoC people in Thedas because Medieval Europe didn't have them, is staggering.
Here's some interesting commentary on that whole attitude, if you're interested. I was linked to it just last night....I am a POC, and I have never seen anything quite like this.
Hazegurl wrote...
No it isn't better imo. Both had issues and both had something to aspire to, I think ME should be more like DA in terms of offering everyone a chance to romance the one they want. Besides you only know Anders is bi through metagaming. Fenris could be 100% straight or gay depending and so could Merrill and you know Izzy is bi cause she makes it clear in game. it's not BW's fault you can't RP in a RPG.