Aller au contenu

Photo

You think there will be another character, and romance discussion forum?


221 réponses à ce sujet

#176
InvincibleHero

InvincibleHero
  • Members
  • 2 676 messages
Foopy I am sure terms of service can be shown to veto many of those topics and specific posts. It is a public forum and some discussions just are not proper or even relevant to the game itself. Being it is not a hardcore sex game people should not be discussing we should be able to do this and this with Tali. This being some sexual act. Keep it to things shown in the game.

Sorry everywhere you post someone else gets to determine what is "normal and allowable" on their site.

#177
Guest_Fandango_*

Guest_Fandango_*
  • Guests

Foopydoopydoo wrote...

I didn't realize we were arguing 'bout smart business practices tho. And here I was going on about how what people considered normal shouldn't dictate how and what other people got to discuss. Not whether it would be allowed but whether it should be allowed. Silly me.


Which is to say what exactly? That certain people should be allowed to discuss their kinks and fetishes on the BSN with impunity? Serious question.

#178
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests
And let's be honest here. If you discuss your weird kinks in public you deserve to be mocked for them.

#179
InvincibleHero

InvincibleHero
  • Members
  • 2 676 messages
MM no personal attacks on users should be avoided report and ignore. Just my opinion and safer to avoid a banhammer yourself.

#180
Fredward

Fredward
  • Members
  • 4 994 messages

Fandango9641 wrote...
Which is to say what exactly? That certain people should be allowed to discuss their kinks and fetishes on the BSN with impunity? Serious question.


If it doesn't do anyone any harm and it pertains to the character then why not?

Morocco Mole wrote...
And let's be honest here. If you discuss your weird kinks in public you deserve to be mocked for them.


Why of course! If it's different it's bad by definition, right?

Modifié par Foopydoopydoo, 28 novembre 2013 - 10:53 .


#181
Billy-the-Squid

Billy-the-Squid
  • Members
  • 393 messages

Foopydoopydoo wrote...

Fandango9641 wrote...
Which is to say what exactly? That certain people should be allowed to discuss their kinks and fetishes on the BSN with impunity? Serious question.


If it doesn't do anyone any harm and it pertains to the character then why not?


You can, but expect to be mocked and derided for it. 

#182
Hey

Hey
  • Members
  • 4 080 messages
right, mocked.. not edicts from possible sociopaths on the bsn to regulate - wanting to vilify folks who want to express their feeling, rather than just treating "unacceptable" behavior, romance or not, the same via mother-****ing banning.

#183
Guest_Fandango_*

Guest_Fandango_*
  • Guests

Foopydoopydoo wrote...

Fandango9641 wrote...
Which is to say what exactly? That certain people should be allowed to discuss their kinks and fetishes on the BSN with impunity? Serious question.


If it doesn't do anyone any harm and it pertains to the character then why not?


So - to be clear - you see no problem with people using the BSN to discuss whether they would bugger Tali?

#184
Fredward

Fredward
  • Members
  • 4 994 messages

Tequila Cat wrote...
I'm sure our resident BSN pedophile would agree with you.


See my "sky is falling" comment on the previous page. Different ≠ harmful.

Fandango9641 wrote...
So - to be clear - you see no problem with people using the BSN to discuss whether they would bugger Tali?


Not even vaguely. Whatever floats your boat man.

Modifié par Foopydoopydoo, 28 novembre 2013 - 11:00 .


#185
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests

Foopydoopydoo wrote...

Why of course! If it's different it's bad by definition, right?


Normal well-adjusted people don't discuss their kinks or fetishists in public. A man or woman can be into bondage or BDSM, I don't care. But when you're parading around as a gimp in public well, you're getting get a lot of disgusted looks and laughter at your expense.

There is a time and place for these sort of discussions. BSN is not one of them. If you want to talk about them go to tumblr or livejournal, or a site called fetlife.

#186
Billy-the-Squid

Billy-the-Squid
  • Members
  • 393 messages

Foopydoopydoo wrote...

Tequila Cat wrote...
I'm sure our resident BSN pedophile would agree with you.


See my "sky is falling" comment on the previous page. Different ≠ harmful.


Apart from the fact there is one that frequents this place. So how about that holier than thou art attitude, do you still have those blinkers on?  

#187
Guest_Fandango_*

Guest_Fandango_*
  • Guests

Foopydoopydoo wrote...

Fandango9641 wrote...

So - to be clear - you see no problem with people using the BSN to discuss whether they would bugger Tali?


Not even vaguely. Whatever floats your boat man.


Groovy!

#188
Fredward

Fredward
  • Members
  • 4 994 messages

Tequila Cat wrote...
Apart from the fact there is one that
frequents this place. So how about that holier than thou art attitude,
do you still have those blinkers on? 


Do you expect me to change my views because... wait, I'm not even sure what point you're trying to make here now that I think about it. Pedophilia is definitely deviant but it's also harmful. I'm not forwarding the open and frank discussion of harmful kinks. But not all kinks, not everything that is deviant, is harmful.

BTW if you know, for a fact, that there is a pedophile on this forum you should report that ****.

Morocco Mole wrote...
Normal well-adjusted people don't discuss their kinks or fetishists in public. A man or woman can be into bondage or BDSM, I don't care. But when you're parading around as a gimp in public well, you're getting get a lot of disgusted looks and laughter at your expense.

There is a time and place for these sort of discussions. BSN is not one of them. If you want to talk about them go to tumblr or livejournal, or a site called fetlife.


The idea of normalcy is transient as ****. There is literally no reason for what is currently considered normal to remain such forever, it's not even possible. I don't expect everyone to accept it, it's the active exclusion bit that gets me. And for no other reason that it makes you uncomfortable.

Modifié par Foopydoopydoo, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:03 .


#189
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests
Doesn't really make me uncomfortable at all. I find it hilarious more often than not.

#190
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 183 messages

Fandango9641 wrote...

Foopydoopydoo wrote...

Fandango9641 wrote...
Which is to say what exactly? That certain people should be allowed to discuss their kinks and fetishes on the BSN with impunity? Serious question.


If it doesn't do anyone any harm and it pertains to the character then why not?

So - to be clear - you see no problem with people using the BSN to discuss whether they would bugger Tali?

Why should I? To be clear: I do find this weird and even a bit creepy, but that has never been a sufficient reason for me to prevent someone from speaking their mind or taking part in a discussion.

As I see it, freedom of speech means that you're occasionally exposed to stuff that offends you, and being part of a freedom-of-speech culture requires that you learn to live with that and don't react with a call for censorship.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 28 novembre 2013 - 11:58 .


#191
Dhiro

Dhiro
  • Members
  • 4 491 messages
If there is a paedophile on the BSN I hope that you people have done what you can to report him/her, instead of simply using their existence as a bizarre trump card against The Romance Weirdos ™.

#192
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 974 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Fandango9641 wrote...

Foopydoopydoo wrote...

Fandango9641 wrote...
Which is to say what exactly? That certain people should be allowed to discuss their kinks and fetishes on the BSN with impunity? Serious question.


If it doesn't do anyone any harm and it pertains to the character then why not?

So - to be clear - you see no problem with people using the BSN to discuss whether they would bugger Tali?

Why should I? To be clear: I do find this weird and even a bit creepy, but that has never been a sufficient reason for me to prevent someone from speaking their mind or taking part in a discussion.

As I see it, freedom of speech means that you're occasionally exposed to stuff that offends you, and being part of a freedom-of-speech culture requires that you learn to live with that and don't react with a call for censorship.


Freedom of speech doesn't apply to a privately owned forum of a company who has a brand reputation to consider and product to sell. The romance obsession/discussion is a major reason why the BSN and by extension BW itself is a laughing stock on other forums.

Nevermind the bizarre and creepy discussion like tali sweat and whether one wants to have anal with her but when you have several hundred or thousand page long threads on such a miniscule "feature" like the "romances" while sections dedicated to the real meat of the game like character builds are a virtual ghost town then something is severely wrong with the forum. That these games have gained a rep for being "datesims" played by sexual deviants/degenerates is cause for concern for BW.

The BSN is long overdue for a thorough crackdown on this filth and silliness. What Priestly did with the closing of the ME3 chracter/romance section is merely a bandage on a large gaping wound.

#193
Reznore57

Reznore57
  • Members
  • 6 144 messages
I've only spend time in the DA2 companions sub forum , and it's really not the pit of hell some people are describing.
There's no troll over there , and posters are friendly.
Sometimes it gets a bit silly , but I don't think silly is bad , and I don't remember reading something and feeling the sudden urge to use some brain bleach.

I certainly felt way more uncomfortable reading some thread in the main general forums , where people were passive agressive (or just plain agressive ) towards each others.

#194
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages

Dhiro wrote...

If there is a paedophile on the BSN I hope that you people have done what you can to report him/her, instead of simply using their existence as a bizarre trump card against The Romance Weirdos ™.


The poster in question proclaimed herself to be a pedophile on different game forums but not here so there really isn't anything to do.

Modifié par wolfhowwl, 28 novembre 2013 - 12:42 .


#195
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 183 messages
@Seboist:
Dry stuff like character builds doesn't evoke passion, thus it doesn't get talked about as much, and people who do talk about it leave when the topic they wanted to discuss has been exhausted, their problem solved or their question answered.

Story decisions and characters, those evoke passion, and thus they are talked about more.

Those who look down their noses at BSN, I'd ask: do you care about story and characters? If not, if it's all "just a game" to you, then STFU because you know nothing. If you do, then have a look into the Harry Potter forums to calibrate your weirdness meter. BSN is not exceptional among the sites where people talk about story and characters in works of fiction. It may be exceptional among game sites, but that's because most games don't feature these things nearly as prominently as Bioware's do.

Also, it's dishonest to hold up the most extreme examples as evidence that "people are creepy here".

Modifié par Ieldra2, 28 novembre 2013 - 01:19 .


#196
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...
First off, this is not the place for you to talk about kinks or fetishes. Go to fetlife or a hundred different other websites out there if you really must talk about whatever rocks your boat. It shouldn't be be on this site. 

That's for Bioware to decide, not you. If they have a problem with it, they'll set out rules accoridngly. If they don't, then you have no right to insult people for posting whatever the hell they want.

If this makes me a tea partier so be it.

The posters have proven that they cannot adhere to the rules. Numerous times. Hence why the ME3 version was shut down.

It was shut down because posters got in heated arguments. I have yet to hear any Bioware developer say they took issue with anything else.

There is no point in making a forum for characters and romances, there is little gain to be had in it from the moderation the things take to keep the shippers, fetishists, and trolls breaking a hundred rules every waking hour.

There's no point to any forum, except to make a space for discussion of a given topic.

If you really want to discuss a character there is nothing stopping you from doing it in the main section.

There's nothing stopping you from discussing gameplay or quests in the main section either, but having distinct subforums makes it easier for people to find the topics they're interested in.

Given how disgusted you apparently are by the content of character/romance forums, I would think you, of all people, would want the main forum to be free of that stuff.

#197
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests
I do care about the story and characters. Unfortunately, if I want to discuss the characters I am not allowed to because my opinion of said characters my go against the bizarre tribalism such threads attract. They are not discussion threads. They are circlejerk threads.

As I see it, freedom of speech means that you're occasionally exposed to stuff that offends you, and being part of a freedom-of-speech culture requires that you learn to live with that and don't react with a call for censorship.


There is no freedom of speech on the internet. You are bound by the rules the site owner establishes.

ng. If you do, then have a look into the Harry Potter forums to calibrate your weirdness meter.


If your argument is "other fandoms are weirder" then you lose. All fandoms are weird and I don't really care.

#198
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Dhiro wrote...

If there is a paedophile on the BSN I hope that you people have done what you can to report him/her, instead of simply using their existence as a bizarre trump card against The Romance Weirdos ™.

I'm pretty sure there's no such individual. Rather, I suspect they've taken some comment out of contet, or chosen to take a sarcastic comment literally, so they can use it as fodder for harrassment.

#199
Guest_Morocco Mole_*

Guest_Morocco Mole_*
  • Guests

That's for Bioware to decide, not you. If they have a problem with it, they'll set out rules accoridngly. If they don't, then you have no right to insult people for posting whatever the hell they want.


Pot meet kettle.

It was shut down because posters got in heated arguments. I have yet to hear any Bioware developer say they took issue with anything else.


Bioware is never going to officially say they closed the forum because they were weird and hurting the site's reputation.  But the fact it was closed over a year ago and never re-opened says all.

There's no point to any forum, except to make a space for discussion of a given topic.


And there is no discussion in those threads outside of mindless gushing.

There's nothing stopping you from discussing gameplay or quests in the main section either, but having distinct subforums makes it easier for people to find the topics they're interested in.


Gameplay and character building is generally much more important feature than romances.

Given how disgusted you apparently are by the content of character/romance forums, I would think you, of all people, would want the main forum to be free of that stuff.


Because a subforum is on the main page, that's the whole point.

Modifié par Morocco Mole, 28 novembre 2013 - 01:31 .


#200
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Morocco Mole wrote...
Normal well-adjusted people don't discuss their kinks or fetishists in public.

Obviously you've never heard of the Folsom Street Fair, or the numerous other public events that serve precisely this purpose.