196 réponses à ce sujet

[Texhnolyze101]

Seival wrote...

MarchWaltz wrote...

Non-optimization for the PC

PC = workstation.
Console = playstation.
Specialization = the catalyst of the progress.

Games shouldn't be optimized for PCs, they should be optimized for consoles. And PCs should be optimized for working.

Has anyone ever told you how stupid you are? this post makes me want to punch someone in the face and i'm not naming names either.

[Seival]

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

Seival wrote...

MarchWaltz wrote...

Non-optimization for the PC

PC = workstation.
Console = playstation.
Specialization = the catalyst of the progress.

Games shouldn't be optimized for PCs, they should be optimized for consoles. And PCs should be optimized for working.

Has anyone ever told you how stupid you are? this post makes me want to punch someone in the face and i'm not naming names either.

So, you call "specialization" stupid, and "punching random faces because of your pride and anger" the right thing to do? This reminds me the way of thinking of most people who lived 500 years ago, and before

Modifié par Seival, 02 décembre 2013 - 09:38 .

[XX-Pyro]

Rubios wrote...

Microtransactions.

Seival wrote...

MarchWaltz wrote...

Non-optimization for the PC

PC = workstation.
Console = playstation.
Specialization = the catalyst of the progress.

Games shouldn't be optimized for PCs, they should be optimized for consoles. And PCs should be optimized for working.

And mobile phones should be optimized for making calls, so bring those MP3 players and Nokia 3310 back amirite?

Multipurpose devices the future, and that means videogame consoles will slowly fade away. You have two options:

1 - Deal with it.
2 - Deal with it.

Don't necessarily agree with his post, but yours is absurdly wrong as well. If you think consoles are going anywhere, you've got to be kidding yourself. Multipurpose devices aren't the future, convenience is the future. Consoles allow people to conveniently watch movies, play games, and do an array of things in their living rooms all from a single box, in an easy-to-learn convenient fashion. PCs are generally more expensive, do the exact same things as a console except with more power, however it's at the cost of convenience and the price tag. 

Anything a computer does that a console doesn't in terms of being "multipurpose" (ie. work projects, schoolwork, etc) is better accomplished on a cheap laptop which shouldn't be used for playing games regardless.

And for the record, I use both PCs and a PS3 (PS4 when more titles arrive). The PC for older games I have and typically most RPG's (excluding the DA series) and the PS for everything else.

[XX-Pyro]

Rubios wrote...

XX-Pyro wrote...

If you think consoles are going anywhere, you've got to be kidding yourself. Multipurpose devices aren't the future, convenience is the future. Consoles allow people to conveniently watch movies, play games, and do an array of things in their living rooms all from a single box, in an easy-to-learn convenient fashion.

So... like a tablet, but worse.

Yep, no future.

XX-Pyro wrote...
Anything
a computer does that a console doesn't in terms of being "multipurpose" (ie. work projects, schoolwork, etc) is better accomplished on a cheap laptop which shouldn't be used for playing games regardless.

LOL

All the people using multiple monitors and decent keyboards for work related stuff must be itching to throw all that away and buy some 500€ piece of crap, and the PC gaming market must not be growing either.

People not using laptops for work related things are generally doing it wrong, sorry to disappoint you. Cheap, portable, efficient. As for the tablet part, not much to say to that considering how silly of a response that is. Tablets are better compared to laptops, not consoles.

I'm still laughing at the fact that you honestly think the PC market is taking over the console market.

Modifié par XX-Pyro, 03 décembre 2013 - 12:32 .

[__c]

Well, to me it looks like consoles have recently [almost] become PCs, just locked down as much as possible. With new console gen, as far as gaming is concerned, PCs and consoles are in the same bucket facing smartphones/tablets as far as I can tell.

As for greatest fears...
Too much focus on open world/sandbox/generic elements that don't mean anything in the end and too little focus on story/characters... you know old BW stuff.
Forced MP
Too many DLCs/blank spots in original game left to be filled with DLCs.
Too much like Skyrim, too little like KOTOR

Modifié par __c, 03 décembre 2013 - 02:35 .

[Angrywolves]

silly pms from immature players not wanting to admit they were wrong about the game, or some facit of it.
Players upset about hawke being dead or the warden being dead or a ghoul, or both scenarios.

[themageguy]

I'm worried that Mage enemies will employ the same strategies as other mages with just a different element attached to the shared power. Like in DA2 the mages used the same spells mostly (the qunari mages had that cool lightning shield spell) whereas in origins.....best fights ever.
And certain mages used different spells.
If you attack the dalish camp, you'll find the other 2 mages use stonefist , petrify , shock and fireball in addition to zathrians ice and hex spells.
Whereas other mages used a mix of different spells.
In the fade, circle Mage unleashed inferno.....I want this variety please.

[Sidney]

Frankly they are gonna bite off more than they can chew. They do a story based RPG experience and they do it well. Throwing in strategy elements, exploration and god knows what else do we lose the core of what made their past games appealing? Toss in that if they "learned" anything from Skyrim then this game is really in trouble because Skyrim was nothing but a MMO for one person.

[crimzontearz]

Mass Effect 3 level if aggravating ending

No NG+

[Trolldrool]

Tons of early overpowered DLC weapons and armor that ruin the purpose of having various item models since you never need to replace them. Especially ones that level with the character.

[Tajerio]

Combat that falls between the two stools of DA:O and DA2, and suffers for it.

Having no companions in the game whose character and decisions I respect. I really enjoyed most of the characters in DA2, but I not infrequently felt like I was some combination of parent and psychiatrist shepherding my morally deficient, mentally ill party. At least in DA:O we had Sten and Morrigan, with whom I usually disagreed, but I least felt like they could handle their own lives and were complete characters without me.

[Vaedaku]

That either we'll be stuck with just the "diplomatic/sarcastic/aggressive" personality options, or that they'll go away altogether. I like the idea... It's just that more options than simply good, funny, and evil/angry need to exist. Origins pretty much got it right with the amount of and difference in choices. Apart from that, the dialogue not matching up with the dialogue choices. I have to quicksave so often in case a conversation pops up, and Hawke decides to say something completely different to what it looked like it's going to be that I'm starting to think I'll go all VengenceAnders on my computer one day.

That and flat PC voice acting. Am I the only one that thinks male Hawke makes "I love you" sound like a threat?

-As an edit, I dislike how some of Hawke's lines we automatically aligned to believing in the chantry, or the maker at least. I liked how in Origins you were given the chance to avoid that, even if at times it came off a bit strong. If what it was like in DA2 returns in Inquisition, it'll end up becoming a pet peeve for me.

Modifié par Vaedaku, 03 décembre 2013 - 08:20 .

[Secretlyapotato]

Bugs regarding choices. DAO and DA2 are both terrible with their plot flags, and there were so many things they didn't fix that mods had to. The Keep should help a lot, but....

Modifié par Secretlyapotato, 03 décembre 2013 - 08:10 .

[MrMrPendragon]

That some questions might be left unanswered.

There are so many things/events/mysteries in the Dragon Age universe that they might not all be explored.

Like how we might be so focused on the veil tears, we might not explore the conflict about how elves should get their own land. Or whether or not the dwarves get back their territories in the deep roads.

[BouncyFrag]

Gotta echo micro-transactions. We get a more open worldly game with $$ exp boost packs to bypass grindy mechanics and I don't know what I'll do. I usually don't get that bent out of shape over gaming issues, but this would do it.

[Cainhurst Crow]

Forced Dichotomies.

Forced Dichotomies Everywhere.

[LinksOcarina]

Rubios wrote...

XX-Pyro wrote...
I'm still laughing at the fact that you honestly think the PC market is taking over the console market.

I'm still laughting too, at your lack of reading comprehension.

This and this taking over the console market is already a fact, PC will probably remain a niche, like dedicated consoles.

Feel free to live in denial but make sure you enjoy the last videogame console generation (I sure will).

This won't be the last. 

It will however be one of the last with physical copy being prevelant to sales. Digital sales are just going to increase and soon consoles will become a dedicated PC.

As for the mobile and tablet markets, the issue there is a disparity of gameplay styles; a lot of what sells on those markets are not what would sell on a console. It is two different markets with crossover that is being formed, instead of one gobbling up the other. We can thank the Wii for that because of the influx of a more casual gaming market allowed this to happen. 

[13Dannyboy13]

I have a few fears about this game, the two at the top of the list being that the game will be too short and linear, the other being the game's combat being oversimplified just to get more sales, like the button mashing in DA2 which required very little strategy. The next issue I think would be dlc, I absolutely hate day one dlc, or dlc release a week after the game, the things you know were left out on purpose for a blatant money grab. My other concern with dlc is seeing dlc with substance, something that adds to the story, most dlc these days is cosmetic and adds very little, if anything, to the overall game. I do try to remain optimistic, but it's difficult after the last few games, still hoping for a pleasant surprise with this one though.

[TurretSyndrome]

It's not a fear, let alone my greatest fear, it's just a concern. The decision to make the game for PS3 and X360 will hamper the quality on PS4, XBONE and PC.

Those two consoles are too old, most new titles are barely running on them, so I don't think a title being released an year from now will fare any better, it'll actually be worse. I feel that the quality will be toned down to accommodate for the both of them. Sure PC, PS4 and XBONE will receive a few quirks but that's it.

Honestly, they should just develop for PC and next gen consoles and maintain quality, instead of trying to cash in from every corner.