Seival wrote...
Good question. And imagine, that instead of creating those excess things, devs could spend more time to improve main plot and the characters...
^AresKeith wrote...
Seival wrote...
SgtSteel91 wrote...
How many side quests were really needed in DAO or Mass Effect? There could have been some that could expand on events outside the main plot like the Grisson Academy: Rescue mission or the Infiltrate the Geth Consensus mission but there were also unneeded ones like the mineral excavation side-quest in Mass Effect or helping that Salarian in Omega pick up packages in Mass Effect 2.
Good question. And imagine, that instead of creating those excess things, devs could spend more time to improve main plot and the characters...
...When I remember Mako and side missions from ME1, I can think only about the lost opportunities to make the story much better.
And if they constantly make the story bigger than it should be it's gonna drag out to the point where nobody cares about it anymore
Example: Knack
Well that's just it, one could argue that just about every game with a named protaganist allows you the roleplay because you assume the role of that character, really anything from doom to pacman would qualify. However RPGs promise the experiance of being about to craft your own character to a certain extent so I'm inclined disagree with that prespective when talking about games like dragon age.addiction21 wrote...
Then is it even roleplay if its so restricted, predetermined and linear? I understand everyone has there own barometer when it comes to such things but then it can be so far to one side its not even a question.
If we are going to get technical then Doom allows me to roleplay by choosing what weapon I am using or path im going down.
Modifié par Greylycantrope, 04 décembre 2013 - 11:58 .
Modifié par The Night Mammoth, 04 décembre 2013 - 11:58 .
Modifié par dreamgazer, 05 décembre 2013 - 12:01 .
spirosz wrote...
Wise developers also create and develop games the way they want to regardless of what is happening in relation to outside influences. If this was the case - I doubt we would see as many indie (and amazing) as we do because of "evolving" with the times.
Don't even joke about Mass Effect being good even among the other two.The Night Mammoth wrote...
Mass Effect 1 had the best story of the three and it had the Mako. Mass Effects 2 and 3 had worse stories and didn't feature the Mako.
Therefore, the Mako is Mass Effect.
You lose, Seival.
Br3ad wrote...
Don't even joke about Mass Effect being good even among the other two.The Night Mammoth wrote...
Mass Effect 1 had the best story of the three and it had the Mako. Mass Effects 2 and 3 had worse stories and didn't feature the Mako.
Therefore, the Mako is Mass Effect.
You lose, Seival.
I vastly preferred ME to ME2.Br3ad wrote...
Don't even joke about Mass Effect being good even among the other two.
Guest_simfamUP_*
Mr.House wrote...
Mako for LI.
What meaningful decisions did you make for Jodie? Did you have any control over Jodie's motives or feelings at any point during the game?Seival wrote...
Really?... But somehow, I like roleplaying Jodie much more than roleplaying Shepard.
Modifié par Ravensword, 05 décembre 2013 - 12:21 .
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
I wasn't making a point on which one was better, all of them are B-rate games with a C-rate protagonist at best. I commented on which had the better story. Which was ME2, becasue at least it didn't pretend to have one.Sylvius the Mad wrote...
I vastly preferred ME to ME2.Br3ad wrote...
Don't even joke about Mass Effect being good even among the other two.
simfamSP wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
Mako for LI.
'dat boost jump tho
Br3ad wrote...
I wasn't making a point on which one was better, all of them are B-rate games with a C-rate protagonist at best. I commented on which had the better story. Which was ME2, becasue at least it didn't pretend to have one.Sylvius the Mad wrote...
I vastly preferred ME to ME2.Br3ad wrote...
Don't even joke about Mass Effect being good even among the other two.
Mr.House wrote...
Mako for LI.
Ok, stop right there. ME2 was the best of all three.Nerevar-as wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
I wasn't making a point on which one was better, all of them are B-rate games with a C-rate protagonist at best. I commented on which had the better story. Which was ME2, becasue at least it didn't pretend to have one.Sylvius the Mad wrote...
I vastly preferred ME to ME2.Br3ad wrote...
Don't even joke about Mass Effect being good even among the other two.
ME1 was the only with a decent story at all (in the sense I wasn´t noticing plot holes immediately as I was playing). ME2 main plot was more of a below average sidequest, and ME3´s makes as much sense as Prometheus.
Hahahaha.eluvianix wrote...
Ok, stop right there. ME2 was the best of all three.Nerevar-as wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
I wasn't making a point on which one was better, all of them are B-rate games with a C-rate protagonist at best. I commented on which had the better story. Which was ME2, becasue at least it didn't pretend to have one.Sylvius the Mad wrote...
I vastly preferred ME to ME2.Br3ad wrote...
Don't even joke about Mass Effect being good even among the other two.
ME1 was the only with a decent story at all (in the sense I wasn´t noticing plot holes immediately as I was playing). ME2 main plot was more of a below average sidequest, and ME3´s makes as much sense as Prometheus.
J. Reezy wrote...
Freaking Mako haters man...Mesina2 wrote...
Mr.House wrote...
Mako for LI.
But he'll cheat on you!
Il Divo wrote...
I still wish Bioware had scrapped the Mako, if it would have meant some halfway decent side quests.
With Mass Effect, it felt like Bioware borrowed all the wrong elements from Baldur's Gate 1.
Something amusing?<_<The Night Mammoth wrote...
Hahahaha.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut