Aller au contenu

Photo

Review/Notes for ME: Foundation #1-4, the ME1 Section


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
5 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Deadpool9

Deadpool9
  • Members
  • 610 messages
Mass Effect: Foundation #1 – Do children speak like this child does?  It was difficult to suspend disbelief, instead of focusing on poor dialogue writing.  (It gave me pause to consider the ME writers ever writing future children's dialogue, considering this and, ahem, the "child," or children, at the end of ME3.)  Also, the twist at the end was interesting, but not original.  The Dark Knight Rises did it first.  And thus, we’re introduced to Maya Brooks, Citadel DLC antagonist.  Approximately zero fans demanded more backstory about her; yet, her subsequent character arc could be promising but more likely will be hardly developed by Mac.  She seems more like an excuse to (re)view the trilogy from a new perspective, given the gimmick of jumping from ME character to ME character in each new issue. 

Mass Effect: Foundation #2 – This is the best and only worthy issue of the ME1 third of the Foundation series.  Like #1, 3, and 4, it doesn’t tell us anything too interestingly new, plot-wise. The difference is, the characterization is strong, or at least entertaining, while the other issues’ characterizations are bland.  Its strength is in the characterization of Wrex, specifically.  Also, his interaction with Jasox and his interaction with Brooks were either entertaining or ironic.  (Side note: There’s something magical about conversations on elevators.) 

Mass Effect: Foundation #3 – Do we need to see what occurred with Ashley and her squad directly before the Geth attack in ME1?  Arguably, Mass Effect: Paragon Lost’s boring characters were less boring than Ash’s squad, here.  Ash is a sex object – check.  Ash is distrusted because of her grandfather – check.  Ash is a good soldier and leader – check.  Dull.  Outright telling us what happened beyond the bits we could discern from ME1’s introduction and from conversations with Ash aboard the Normandy was a poor decision. Nobody asked for this issue, and it’s straight filler. 

Mass Effect: Foundation #4 – Again, what did this issue contribute to the new?  Did we need to see what Kaiden went through at “brain camp” that was more interesting than what we could imagine from our discussions with him aboard the Normandy in ME1?  No. And just like Ash’s ME:F #3, this issue was needless and seemed like filler.  But there was a decent albeit scant bit with Kaiden’s dad’s support and the short dialogue about decisions and consequences.

Putting it all together, ME: Foundation #1-4 served to insert Brooks/Rasa into the ME1 timeline and to give her viewpoint on some of those events, to give Cerberus/TIM/Kai Leng (Leng, hardly worth mentioning, here) a bigger presence in ME1, and to flesh out three separate backstories from ME1, focusing on three separate characters: Wrex, Ashley, and Kaiden.  Overall, the series has been mediocre, C -level comic book storytelling so far, with one standout issue in #2 that is about a B+/A-.

 
Miscellaneous Notes:

-Noticeable absence of Quarians and Asari in this ME1-focused quartet.  At least the Turians got Vyrnnus and a slaver mention, and the Batarians had a brief, but violent, encounter with Wrex.

-It was solid to see Brooks/Rasa express a sense of admiration, or even attraction, for Wrex, at the end of #2.  This was perhaps further developed in her lingering look of Kaiden’s image at the end of #3.  Could this be a reminder of Brooks as a flesh n’ blood woman who currently lacks a romance, as well as a hint toward a Brooks/Rasa romance with Shepard’s clone later in this series?  A future issue cover (#8) shows her caressing Thane, but it’s unlikely that there’s a genuine romance there.  Perhaps her seduction skills will be explored, although she’s merely treacherous.  Time will tell if Mac is merely obvious or if he’s skilled enough to develop a genuine romance for Brooks/Rasa.

-By revealing Cerberus' hand in the events of ME1 much more clearly, does that hurt its sense of mystery when you piece together its sinister actions by playing all the sidequests in ME1?

- ME: Foundation #5-8 ostensibly jumps to the events of ME2.  So far, the events of ME1 were meant for entertainment but did little to nothing for enlightenment.  The result is hollow entertainment.  I’m not sure ME2’s events will be much better, although some fans (particularly Miri fans) seem to enjoy #5 and look forward to #6.

-Will #9 finish with ME2, or jump to ME3?  #7 focuses on Jack, #8 on Thane.  #9-13 or #10-13 should focus on ME3, although apparently Mac drops out after #10.  It will also be interesting to see if the subsequent writer for #11-13 will be an improvement, although Mac in absence apparently still defined the plot.

Modifié par Deadpool9, 01 décembre 2013 - 09:28 .


#2
Linkenski

Linkenski
  • Members
  • 3 452 messages
You forgot to mention that the twist at the end of #1 is dumb because the child (Rasa) kills Brooks to board her ship and get off the rock. This is clearly shown. How does a child, aproximately 8 years old fly a frigging cargo ship, or whatever it is?!

And yes you're right. Mac should never touch children again (wow that sounds wrong) because they sound like they're his mouthpiece and they sound omniscent every time. It's scary how similar Mac is to David Cage sometimes, but I'd give kudos to Cage because some child interactions in both Heavy Rain and Beyond actual felt realistic, but still he made the whole thing where the child said omniscent stuff like "It will never be over" just like ME3's child says "You can't help me" etc.

#3
AlexMBrennan

AlexMBrennan
  • Members
  • 7 002 messages

How does a child, aproximately 8 years old fly a frigging cargo ship, or whatever it is?!

Autopilot? It's not like anyone was piloting the Normandy's shuttle before they had to create some make-work job for Steeeeeeeeeeve.

As for all EU materials, the purpose is more making money and keeping people involved in the ME franchise (even if it's just a rehash of old stories you are more likely to buy the next game if you've just bought the latest Me comic/read the last Me book - unless it's Deceptiom/played the latest Me DLC)... I'd think of it as an advertising campaign the customer pays for upfront.

Modifié par AlexMBrennan, 01 décembre 2013 - 11:40 .


#4
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 950 messages
Quarians aren't really common enough for their absence too be remarkable. It's like there being no Belgians in a story about the real world.  Or at least it should be, though they turned up rather a lot in ME2 and 3

Modifié par Wulfram, 02 décembre 2013 - 12:45 .


#5
Deadpool9

Deadpool9
  • Members
  • 610 messages

Linkenski wrote...

And yes you're right. Mac should never touch children again (wow that sounds wrong) because they sound like they're his mouthpiece and they sound omniscent every time. It's scary how similar Mac is to David Cage sometimes, but I'd give kudos to Cage because some child interactions in both Heavy Rain and Beyond actual felt realistic, but still he made the whole thing where the child said omniscent stuff like "It will never be over" just like ME3's child says "You can't help me" etc.


LoL @ the Mac/children line.

As far as Cage's Heavy Rain and Beyond: Two Souls, I didn't notice any unusual or take-me-out-of-the-moment dialogue from the children.  What I would compare between Mac and Cage is their idea of a utopia.  Synthesis vs. [***spoiler alert for Beyond: Two Souls] whatever the heck kind of afterlife Beyond showed.  Trust me, life was much more appealing than whatever that crappy afterlife was in Beyond. [***end spolier alert for Beyond: Two Souls]

AlexMBrennan wrote...

As for all EU materials, the purpose is more making money and keeping people involved in the ME franchise (even if it's just a rehash of old stories you are more likely to buy the next game if you've just bought the latest Me comic/read the last Me book - unless it's Deceptiom/played the latest Me DLC)... I'd think of it as an advertising campaign the customer pays for upfront.


This is why I don't buy the Trade Paperbacks anymore.  In fact, I got the bundle of #1-4 on Dark Horse's website for $6, which is about a buck-fifty per issue.  I'll wait a bit longer to see if #4-8 get a bundle, too.  $3.99/issue seems a bit overpriced, especially when we're talking digital, non-physical copies.

Wulfram wrote...

Quarians aren't really common enough for their absence too be remarkable. It's like there being no Belgians in a story about the real world.


Perhaps I left my thought somewhat unfinished.  Considering that Mac tried to revisit so much in ME1, it's almost equally interesting to note what he intentionally didn't revisit.  No Tali and no Liara...  I wonder why.  Then one wonders if he was either not as interested in them or not as comfortable writing them, but that would be conjecture.

And also, what do you have against the Belgians?  Haha.  Besides, the attack on the Turian slavers could've also had a similar mention of the Cerberus attack on the Quarian flotilla, from one of the books.

Modifié par Deadpool9, 02 décembre 2013 - 12:50 .


#6
DuskWanderer

DuskWanderer
  • Members
  • 2 088 messages
I agree about Ashley and Kaidan contributing nothing new to the story. Seriously, what was that? We could at least have had unmentioned missions they did in the past.