just like the qunThe Sin wrote...
Everything has a purpose. Inquisition wastes nothing.
Would you kill templars in DA3 if doing so stopped the creation of red templars?
#776
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 02:39
#777
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 02:51
Youth4Ever wrote...
What if you know a large section of templar rebels are using or had been using red lyrium. They aren't savage, but they aren't completely sane either, and you know that a descent into madness is an inevitability i.e. Bartrand. These templars don't seem much of a threat at present-- their helping a village or something-- but you know they will threaten the Inquisition's principle mission if left to their own devices. What do you do with sort of group?
Well, it's kind of obvious that a purge would be the "correct" course of action.
Or perhaps you don't know for certain that they're using red lyrium, but they're believed to be exhibiting some signs. What's to done about them?
I'm sure we'd be given the option to conduct questioning or a further investigation in this situation.
#778
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 06:34
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Darth Brotarian wrote...
This whole thread should be locked and deleted because it might be used to post porn in the future.
There's already porn on BSN.
#779
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 07:29
Darth Brotarian wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Can't forget about Xil either.Darth Brotarian wrote...
LOLandStuff wrote...
First there was 101ezylonhxeT, then KainD, then Plaintiff. Any idea on who's next?
We still need Raijin.
And the big D, D to the A to the VID.
Speak not the names of of the Forbidden ones!
Listen not to them speak, for their words are insanity given form.
Therein lies the gatway to doom. DOOM.
#780
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 01:18
No. I believe in that old "Everything has its place in the Universe" theory, and we don't know enough about Dragon Age's universe to stop applying chainsaws to what may be a important pillar of its existance.
I wouldn't even think of killing all the demons in the fade. For all we know, the spirits, now rid of their only natural enemies may start venturing out into fade and involve themselves into mortal affairs just like the demons did. We would have Wynnes and Anders everywhere. Countries would start going to war over justice for spilled ale, or start searching Thedas for cures to help sick nugs. The entire world would become slaves to good intentions.
Basically, you don't flood a town to kill a house fire.
#781
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 01:22
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Darth Brotarian wrote...
EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Can't forget about Xil either.Darth Brotarian wrote...
LOLandStuff wrote...
First there was 101ezylonhxeT, then KainD, then Plaintiff. Any idea on who's next?
We still need Raijin.
And the big D, D to the A to the VID.
Speak not the names of of the Forbidden ones!
Listen not to them speak, for their words are insanity given form.
Therein lies the gatway to doom. DOOM.
#782
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 03:13
That is so insulting to Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. it is insulting. Even Malcom X (a more militant minded individual) didn't resort to terrorism.
Even the Stonewall riots, which were violent, were not acts of terrorism (they weren't an act of civil rights either) - and then years and years of peaceful demonstrations (and genuine work for civil rights).
Violent revolutionaries are NOT civil rights activists.
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 04 décembre 2013 - 03:18 .
#783
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 04:24
#784
Posté 04 décembre 2013 - 09:30
Malcolm X didn't stay militant after converting to islam and going to mecca, he saw muslim of all races equal, then started advocating peace(I was named after him so I have to know a lot about him)Medhia Nox wrote...
Someone compared Anders to civil rights activists.
That is so insulting to Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. it is insulting. Even Malcom X (a more militant minded individual) didn't resort to terrorism.
Even the Stonewall riots, which were violent, were not acts of terrorism (they weren't an act of civil rights either) - and then years and years of peaceful demonstrations (and genuine work for civil rights).
Violent revolutionaries are NOT civil rights activists.
#785
Posté 06 décembre 2013 - 12:37
mx_keep13 wrote...
Malcolm X didn't stay militant after converting to islam and going to mecca, he saw muslim of all races equal, then started advocating peace(I was named after him so I have to know a lot about him)Medhia Nox wrote...
Someone compared Anders to civil rights activists.
That is so insulting to Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. it is insulting. Even Malcom X (a more militant minded individual) didn't resort to terrorism.
Even the Stonewall riots, which were violent, were not acts of terrorism (they weren't an act of civil rights either) - and then years and years of peaceful demonstrations (and genuine work for civil rights).
Violent revolutionaries are NOT civil rights activists.
As princess Leia so wisely said about Darth Vader when his final Fate and his being her father was revealed to her.
"Ten minutes of redemption doesn't make up for ten years of suffering and death."
X was a bigot who aided in the support of a religious assoiation that was briefly classified as a terrorist movement "The Nation fo Islam". Sure you can agure that since Elijah Muhammad's death that they have completely reversed course but that doesn't change the fact X supported that movement with all the Hypocrisy and blatant contempt a religion based around equality and enlightenment can offer.
So sure, you can claim he was a diffrent person at death, it just doesn't change his image in my eye.
#786
Posté 06 décembre 2013 - 01:04
#787
Posté 06 décembre 2013 - 06:54
Medhia Nox wrote...
Someone compared Anders to civil rights activists.
That is so insulting to Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. it is insulting. Even Malcom X (a more militant minded individual) didn't resort to terrorism.
Even the Stonewall riots, which were violent, were not acts of terrorism (they weren't an act of civil rights either) - and then years and years of peaceful demonstrations (and genuine work for civil rights).
Violent revolutionaries are NOT civil rights activists.
This particularly grinds my gears with Nelson Mandela's recent death. If their positions were reversed, Mandela would not have blown up a Chantry, but Anders would have committed genocide in South Africa upon being elected President.





Retour en haut





