91 réponses à ce sujet

[Lady Abstract]

 Im just curious as to what you all believe. Also i like talking about things like this to people just to get other opinions on things and to see the many other perspectives. This is why I've started this new channel vlog channel just to talk about things like this.

I believe that "There's a realm of existence so far beyond your own you cnnot even imagine it"-Sovereign. LOL just kidding (I just had to throw that Sovereign quote in there). But yes tell me what you all think. I mean this universe is huge..the who's to say we cant get enveloped into a new realm 

Anyways heres a video of what i think if you care to watch or not thats fine..either way ide still like to see  different POV's


Here's the link

Modifié par QU33N_ANG3L, 02 décembre 2013 - 08:55 .

[Justise]

Our knowledge is soo limited we know nothing for certain

[IllusiveManJr]

Maybe. Also 2 star? BSN pls.

[Jozape]

Maybe. We have no solid empirical evidence for 'other realms', assuming you mean places like heaven, hell, the string multiverse, or many world interpretation of quantum mechanics.

[The Don's Hound]

I don't oppose the possibility, but there's little evidence, so my opinion on the matter ends.

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

Thanks for your consideration. I'm actually from WH verse where if you become greedy and power hungry you'll become a minion of chaos!
Also I've heard that the rules and material data of other verses are written somewhere. That must be the Realms of Reality.

[mybudgee]

Imagine for a moment, you are a red ant. You are big for an ant, and can easily kill and bully most other ants. Your colony does pretty well, as the predators and competition for food is relatively few and far-between. You go about your business, being an ant, finding resources for the others in your colony and surviving. You have almost no idea there are humans living near the colony, much less their perspective or opinion of you.

Now apply this same dynamic to your own existence. The void of knowledge about another species of sentient creatures on a far away planet or in a concurrent dimension does NOT negate the possibility of their existence....

It simply means we do not possess the technology or physiological capability to perceive of them.

[I WANT YOU TO FUCK ME JERY]

Yes.

It's called Sweden.

[mybudgee]

I truly hope with all my heart that mankind is on the brink of such a discovery...

[Lady Abstract]

Jozape wrote...

Maybe. We have no solid empirical evidence for 'other realms', assuming you mean places like heaven, hell, the string multiverse, or many world interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Lathrim wrote...

I'm open to the possibility of their existence. To my knowledge, nothing proves they exist or that they don't, so that's where my opinion stops.

Whitefang131 wrote...

I don't oppose the possibility, but there's little evidence, so my opinion on the matter ends.

simfamSP wrote...

I'm not going to say it can't happen; but I'm not going to say it's real either. If it is, it is. Just as long as we don't create a Temporal Field in order to create Eternity, we're fine.

#Asimovreference.

I've posted the link of my pov in the OP i forgot to insert it but its updated now 

I mean many different realms of existence. Heaven and hell can be one of them or just a realm that we cannot see with our human eyes. i believe that just because we cant see things with our human eyes doesnt mean it doesnt exist. Sometimes if we are sensitive enough we can feel certain realms

Modifié par QU33N_ANG3L, 02 décembre 2013 - 09:06 .

[Dominus]

Back when I was young, I used to have strange philosophical ideas similar to this - if we pass on, do we head into another reality closely similar/drastically different to ours? Without getting into religious debate, I'd say potential realms exist, but we'd likely never be able to reach them outside TV Shows that may or may not involve Wibbly-Wobbly Timey-Wimey Stuff.

[Lady Abstract]

mybudgee wrote...

Imagine for a moment, you are a red ant. You are big for an ant, and can easily kill and bully most other ants. Your colony does pretty well, as the predators and competition for food is relatively few and far-between. You go about your business, being an ant, finding resources for the others in your colony and surviving. You have almost no idea there are humans living near the colony, much less their perspective or opinion of you.

Now apply this same dynamic to your own existence. The void of knowledge about another species of sentient creatures on a far away planet or in a concurrent dimension does NOT negate the possibility of their existence....

It simply means we do not possess the technology or physiological capability to perceive of them.

This is a great way to put things i like this. 

[Lady Abstract]

Here's the Link


Sorry i meant to post the link earlier. Anyways this is the video of me explaining my perspective. 

[OdanUrr]

[Violation of Rule #6 removed.]

Modifié par Ninja Stan, 03 décembre 2013 - 01:41 .

[Gravisanimi]

I can't even find out if this "reality" exists

[OdanUrr]

Gravisanimi wrote...

I can't even find out if this "reality" exists

What is real?

[Meme image removed.]

Modifié par Ninja Stan, 03 décembre 2013 - 01:43 .

[Jarl Johnnie Walker]

Evidence this, evidence that. We may never truly know what other realities/worlds/universes exist. But who says it's not fun to play with you imagination.

We are on a planet that is in a solar system and that solar system is in a galaxy that is barely out of it's diapers.

This macrocosm is very old. We know a good deal about it. But then sometimes you gotta think. What if we got the "rules" of the cosmos wrong?

For all we know, our universe could be under someone's big toe. Or perhaps our brains are just in jars that are being controlled by some extraterrestrial mad scientists.

How would we know? And can we truly deny the possibility that this is our reality? Can we prove that anything exists except our consciousness?

Is time even real? Did we humans invent time?

Time is something that we perceive as a matter of course, if we view it at the moment, we usually divide it into past, present and future. Say that the past and the future are imagined concepts, while only the present is real.

In other words, today’s breakfast and every word of this post will cease to exist after you have read it, until you or someone else opens it again. The future is just as imaginary, because time cannot exist before and after it happened.

Or on the contrary, if you will, time is multi-layered. It can be compared to an onion. All time exists simultaneously, but the measurement is determined by the observer. What this observer sees depends on which point they are looking at.

Thus the ice age, WWII, and Miley Cyrus all exist simultaneously but can only be observed from a specific location. If one takes this view of reality then the future is hopeless and the deterministic free will is illusory.

What if we are nothing but a thought?

What if you are not your own mind? If I can watch something like this here laptop for example. I am looking at it, interacting with it. It is an object that I can observe.
So, if a thought can be perceived as well, then who's doing the observing?

Point is, we don't know whether or not other realms of reality exists.

I really could just keep throwing things at you, but I won't.

For me, I do not know what to believe. There is simply the known and the unknown.

Which makes me think about if the "known" is even real. But I suppose if I can see it then it must be. Which is odd since we are all made up of the same substance if you think about it.

These are only theories, mind you. Meaning that these are just proposed explanations whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation. It's just something to think about if you're bored or just curious.

Modifié par Jarl Johnnie Walker, 02 décembre 2013 - 10:04 .

[metatheurgist]

There is 0 evidence that other realities exist. And I'm the kind of person that needs at least some kind of proof that something is real - so I don't believe. I think it'd be awesome if they did and as far as I understand it the current state of physics does not disallow the existence of parallel or other realities. Some theories even actively promote them.

[Kaiser Arian XVII]

@Op, your video has no voice.

I'm not one of those thinkers who assume modern philosophy must cut ties with older philosophies, boot-lick empiricism or crusade for social justice (I learned a lot form the synthesis of Hegel-Schopenhauer!)

Everything that can make and think about instruments, institutions and art (A Sapient) has something similar with the Deity(s). I consider rational faculty a great gift that has ties with the realm of existence. Still, it can be abusive, as History has shown us.

Last Note: Humans shouldn't be like animals or robots... completely given in to desires or being artificial and completely out of emotions.

[Angrywolves]

The Twilight Zone
The Outer Limits. Yes I believe in other realms.

[Eternal Phoenix]

[Violation of Rule #6 removed.]

Modifié par Ninja Stan, 03 décembre 2013 - 01:45 .

[Jozape]

QU33N_ANG3L wrote...

i believe that just because we cant see things with our human eyes doesnt mean it doesnt exist. Sometimes if we are sensitive enough we can feel certain realms

No. And for the record, we do not see a lot of things to prove they exist. The wave nature of particles, for example.

Jarl Johnnie Walker wrote...

This macrocosm is very old. We know a good deal about it. But then sometimes you gotta think. What if we got the "rules" of the cosmos wrong?

The "rules" of the "cosmos" are the same as the rules of physics, and they most certainly are not wrong; incomplete, sure, but not wrong.

Unless you are saying you do not believe in general relativity, quantum mechanics, or quantum field theory and the standard model. These are not just some of our most accurate theories in history, they are the most accurate and precise theories in history. Sure, they do not tell us everything about the cosmos; for example, they do not tell us about dark matter or dark energy. But what they do explain, they explain almost perfectly.

For all we know, our universe could be under someone's big toe. Or perhaps our brains are just in jars that are being controlled by some extraterrestrial mad scientists.

There are an infinite numbers of insane possibilities we could not test. Why should we believe any of them? And why that specific possibility or possibilities?

How would we know? And can we truly deny the possibility that this is our reality? Can we prove that anything exists except our consciousness?

We could not know. There is no way to deduce it or observe it. And indeed, if we are brains stuck in jars being controlled by aliens, there is no way we could prove or disprove it. There is also no way I can prove or disprove I am a computer simulation by an i382 to determine the largest digit of pi.

And feel free to explain why we could not prove that the experiences of the consciousness do not exist if the conciousness can be proven to exist.

Is time even real? Did we humans invent time?

Yes, time is real. We can measure it  and have measured it to 0.00000000000000001 seconds or something ridiculous now. It may "only" be an emergent phenomenon of a deeper underlying principle, but then again, so are you and I. I am very distinct from the world around me, as is the force of gravity from the force of electromagnetism.

As for whether we invented time? You are just getting into one of an infinite number of impossible to test hypothesis again. Why should you believe humans invented time, when it could have been god, chimpanzees, bugeyed aliens, or Deep Blue?

What if we are nothing but a thought?

That does not really change anything. I am still here experiencing anger, sadness, humiliation, joy, elation, etc. Well, I suppose it means whoever is thinking us is not kind.

Point is, we don't know whether or not other realms of reality exists.

Which makes believing in them irrational. 

These are only theories, mind you. Meaning that these are just proposed explanations whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation. It's just something to think about if you're bored or just curious.

Actually, much of what you wrote is untestable in principle. And to be picky, you are not talking about theory, but hypothesis, most of it philosophical rather than scientific in principle.

Angrywolves wrote...

The Twilight Zone
The Outer Limits. Yes I believe in other realms.

I think the Scary Door is the true realm.

Modifié par Jozape, 02 décembre 2013 - 04:19 .