Aller au contenu

Photo

Would a Dwarfquisitor even make sense?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
42 réponses à ce sujet

#26
TeamLexana

TeamLexana
  • Members
  • 2 932 messages

Phoenix_Fyre wrote...

 I was going to make my first run a female dwarf warrior, but since dwarves are incapable of even doing magic.... would people even trust a dwarf to lead?

I know they could be 'neutral' in regards to templars and mages.... but I don't know



That doesn't even make sense. That'd mean no one but mages would be "suited" to lead the inquisition. Besides, the Inquisition isn't JUST about the Templar/Mage conflict, it's about finding out and hopefully fixing the giant tear in the viel - something that effects everyone regardless of race.

Surface dwarves are just as likely to be attacked by the demons raining in threw the tears as elves or humans and deep roads dwarves should be concerned as well since the demons are likely to eventually raid their tunnels as well - if there isn't tears down there already.

#27
Asdrubael Vect

Asdrubael Vect
  • Members
  • 1 503 messages
No matter what is you Inquisitor race and mage he/she or not. Many groups will not trust you anyway

And people stop this stupid sh*t about non-humans and mages inquisitors, that they "not make sense" or they are "not trusted to lead Inquisition" or they are "not lore-wise"...srly this "arguments" are bull****

PS. Dwarven inquistor must be more pro-mage inquisitor if we would think about lore-wise and making sense, but still this is you inquisitor and you can choose to do all sh*t that you can imagine

Modifié par Dark Korsar, 03 décembre 2013 - 09:58 .


#28
FINE HERE

FINE HERE
  • Members
  • 534 messages
... what?

#29
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 223 messages
You humans are all... Oh you know.

#30
Aolbain

Aolbain
  • Members
  • 1 206 messages
Last time I checked the dwarfs profited just as much as any one else on the world ending.

#31
Zatche

Zatche
  • Members
  • 1 222 messages
Broader question: does anyone have to trust you for the story to make sense? I'm under the impression that the inquisition doesn't really have to give a hoot about popular opinion.

Modifié par Zatche, 03 décembre 2013 - 05:07 .


#32
ShadyKat

ShadyKat
  • Members
  • 1 849 messages

Phoenix_Fyre wrote...

 I was going to make my first run a female dwarf warrior, but since dwarves are incapable of even doing magic.... would people even trust a dwarf to lead?

I know they could be 'neutral' in regards to templars and mages.... but I don't know


What does not being able to do magic, have anything to do with leading the inquisition?  The entire world is in danger from the veil being ripped open, this includes dwarves. So once again, if a dwarf is a skilled leader, why could they nof lead the inquisition? Do you think the protagonist can only be human so people will follow you? Elves are hated by humans in the DA universe, why not ask why does it make sense for a elf to be the head of the inquisition.  The Qunari aren't trust by many of the other races, why would they lead? Dwarves are at least respected and even trust, and imo, more trusted then the other races.









Btw, why would a human lead the inquisition as well? Elves,  dwarves and qunari don't much care for humans, because they are probably the most racist people in the universe. And all these races will be involved in the inquisition,  not just humans, because they are all equally in danger.

#33
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Dark Korsar wrote...

PS. Dwarven inquistor must be more pro-mage inquisitor if we would think about lore-wise and making sense, but still this is you inquisitor and you can choose to do all sh*t that you can imagine


Not really. A dwarf can still be afraid of mages; dwarves are resistant to them, not immune. Or, a selfless dwarf could be afraid of what they can do to others. (If this was meant to appeal to a general dwarven opinion of mages as given by the lore, I don't believe there is one.)

#34
karushna5

karushna5
  • Members
  • 1 620 messages
I mean the Cadash dwarves, which was listed as the name of the dwarf inquisitor, opened their doors to the elves fleeing arlathan, only to be wiped out by the dwarves of kal sharok to protect their treaties with Tevinter. I feel that history makes a Dwarf Inquisitor amazing regardless of ability to cast magic

#35
Ianamus

Ianamus
  • Members
  • 3 388 messages

Zatche wrote...

Broader question: does anyone have to trust you for the story to make sense?


This, really. We still don't know how you become the leader of the Inquisition. It's completely possible you start with no-one but Cassandra and Varric at your side, in which case the only people who need to trust you in order for you to become the leader of the Inquisition are them. 

Modifié par EJ107, 03 décembre 2013 - 05:04 .


#36
Ruadh

Ruadh
  • Members
  • 401 messages
Dwarf anything makes sense. Cause dwarf.

Except giants. A giant dwarf wouldn't make sense.
  • Finnn62 aime ceci

#37
katerinafm

katerinafm
  • Members
  • 4 291 messages
I really don't see how a dwarf would be any less trust-worthy than any other race suddenly stepping in and becoming the inquisitor and gaining what appears to be a significant amount of power.

If one race had to be less trustworthy than any other, it'd be more logical to say the Quinari, since nobody knows much about them other then seeing the ones that follow the Qun and the Tal-Vasoth enemies (not even the player knows much about them; not yet anyway). I'm sure it'll somehow make sense once the game comes out and we get to play as one, but so far it looks like it'd make sense for them to be the less trusted.
  • Finnn62 aime ceci

#38
Axdinosaurx

Axdinosaurx
  • Members
  • 136 messages
Why would the lack of magical ability make a dwarf less trustworthy? Since they are neutral in the mage/templar conflict, wouldn't that make them more trustworthy?
  • Finnn62 aime ceci

#39
Lebanese Dude

Lebanese Dude
  • Members
  • 5 545 messages
Dwarves are the most neutral party on Thedas, so yes they can fit the role of the inquisitor who is supposed to be bringing change to everything, in potentially the most unbiased way.

#40
Angrywolves

Angrywolves
  • Members
  • 4 644 messages
Don't have a clue about how they're doing the dwarf, unless it's casteless like the child in the slums in DAO and wants change.So to save the child the mother comes topside, one of the choices you could suggest to her in DAO.

#41
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Angrywolves wrote...

Don't have a clue about how they're doing the dwarf, unless it's casteless like the child in the slums in DAO and wants change.So to save the child the mother comes topside, one of the choices you could suggest to her in DAO.


I don't think anyone knows. On the other hand, I'd just assumed the dwarf was a surfacer.
  • Finnn62 aime ceci

#42
Afro_Explosion

Afro_Explosion
  • Members
  • 849 messages
If a dwarfquisitor doesn't make sense to you try a nug inquisitor

#43
Nightdragon8

Nightdragon8
  • Members
  • 2 734 messages

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Angrywolves wrote...

Don't have a clue about how they're doing the dwarf, unless it's casteless like the child in the slums in DAO and wants change.So to save the child the mother comes topside, one of the choices you could suggest to her in DAO.


I don't think anyone knows. On the other hand, I'd just assumed the dwarf was a surfacer.


my thoughts exactly a surface drawf would make the most sense. Cause I can hardly see anyone in the city giving 2 #@$#s about the surface.