MisterJB wrote...
eluvianix wrote...
Or maybe you need to step back and let people speak and bring their "baggage" into the forums. Let them express here what they might not be able to IRL.
Expressing is fine but please, keep it out of debates when it's not a proper equivalent. For instance, it would be nice if users could take a step back and realize that mages can't serve as analogies for real world issues because there are no social groups in the real world that can spit fire or become Eldritch Abominations at any given moment.
It gets especially aggravating when arguments consist solely of that: "Mages are X so, if you support the Templars you are against X which makes you a (insert derogatory term here) and (derogatory term) are bad."
Bolded #1: While we cannot draw full analogies, I would argue that we have to analyze them somehow. Physically, yes, there is no analogy for them AT ALL. But socially, I would say that there most certainly are analogies. Again though, that is my own take on the subject. However, that argument is a whole other ball game and thread on its own, and I am really not interested in rehashing that argument again.
I cannot speak for others, but I rarely do the bolded #2.
1: It is rude.
2: I think it is exceedingly ridiculous to label some people that way. Just because some templars do nasty things doesn't mean that a Templar supporter supports those acts. Mages have been raped by
some Templars, but that hardly means that a person who supports the Templar Order supports and condones rape.
Further, just because I support Mages does not mean I condone blood mages controlling people, or abominations annihilating all the Templars.
Modifié par eluvianix, 03 décembre 2013 - 08:03 .