That you paint any slave owner as a mustache
twirling villain is not a sign of poor writing.Is there no room for a neutral slaver that has sensibilities,
but plies the slave trade for personal gain. My concern is not that slavers are
depicted as dark or corrupt, but that they're represented as inherently evil.
That is however besides the point I was trying to get at in
the original topic . I could care less how slavers are portrayed, just that I'd
like to see characters that represent different sides of Tevinter.
Any "middle class" or wealthy Roman
would have owned a few slaves - and I guarantee that extraordinarily few Romans
considered themselves evil because of it.
So,
even IF Tevinter's Magisters all owned slaves - and even partake in
backstabbing and blood magic. They won't consider themselves evil just because
you do.
It
would be a disservice to a nations supposed cultural mores for them to be
modified to fit modern Earth's view of good and evil.I never expected that they considered themselves evil, I
assumed players perceived them as evil.
I don't consider them evil just because they partake in
slavery or blood magic.
I find Tevinter repugnant - but were I to write
Tevinter, and had decided it was a slave nation, I would have to put that aside
to write it properly.That's a harsh judgement for such a general statement. You
say you find Tevinter repugnant, yet you've only interacted with a handful of Tevinter citizens - most of whom partook in a vile business.
It seems to me that you let the slavery and blood magic idea
cloud your judgement. Romans were a slaving empire, and supported blood sport
venues; however looking into their history you find little evidence that these
environments entirely characterised the citizens, and just like one would
expect all sorts of different people developed.
I would enjoy seeing interaction in the next game that tested
your opinion.
Modifié par Skorm777, 09 décembre 2013 - 05:45 .