Aller au contenu

Photo

Bioware Please Don't Dehumanize the Antagonist


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
434 réponses à ce sujet

#251
Wiggs Magee

Wiggs Magee
  • Members
  • 322 messages

Anomander Rake wrote...

The problem with humanization is that it is hard to make an antagonist seem human without taking away from thewrong things which they have done or without seeming to justify them.

Sometimes humans do things which are evil in a way  which it is impossible as a rational observer to see their internal logic behind why they did what they did.

I think Loghain was characterized well but that does not mean that same path should be followed with the antagonist of DA:I


I disagree with your opinion that sometimes people do evil things just because..
And as much as i realllyyy hate to call in Godwin's law here.. I'm gunna have to reference Hitler here
Who is often seen as one of the more evil people in history... but even he DID have some reasons for what he did, and from his perspective they were sound reasons, he didn't do those actions just to kill people...

So unless someone is a sociopath and lacks a complete moral fibre, then they do have reasons for their actions and that should be explored to allow us to understand the villian...
The best kind of villian is either one that
1. Has a great voice (I mean just listen to Smaug in the Hobbit movie)
2. Has a motive we can understand

#252
Sidney

Sidney
  • Members
  • 5 032 messages

Crimson Sound wrote...

Actually, I think Merrill should have been the villain of DA2. If she had become a villain, her journey into darkness would've made much more sense than Meredith, who was extremely close-minded and was driven even more insane by Red Lyrium.

Getting to the point of this thread, Bioware once referred to a quote that I personally like. "The key to creating a great antagonist is figuring out what makes him the protagonist in his own story." Meredith seems like the worst example of this, but Loghain or Saren are the best.


Why? I really, really wish people could explain why everyone has such love of Loghain.

He has nothing but paranoid ravings to justify his actions in DAO - not counting DLC since people were all over him from the word go. Meredith is suspicious of the mages but at least she has justificiation in game for why she is suspicious.

Loghain betrays a king and starts a civil war in the face of a "foreign" invasion based on his paranoid beliefs. In game, he does nothing to counter the darkspawn invasion so he basically leaves his people to die. Meredith is strict but never resorts to open violence until a mage blows up the Chantry. Her actions might not be the most correct since Anders isn't part of the circle but they aren't that hard to understand.

I get in your example how in his story he is a hero doing something heroic but Merdeith is every bit as much a hero in her mind and based on what they do and how they act in game Meredith is really a lot more reasonable than Loghain.

#253
Augustei

Augustei
  • Members
  • 3 923 messages

Sidney wrote...

Crimson Sound wrote...

Actually, I think Merrill should have been the villain of DA2. If she had become a villain, her journey into darkness would've made much more sense than Meredith, who was extremely close-minded and was driven even more insane by Red Lyrium.

Getting to the point of this thread, Bioware once referred to a quote that I personally like. "The key to creating a great antagonist is figuring out what makes him the protagonist in his own story." Meredith seems like the worst example of this, but Loghain or Saren are the best.


Why? I really, really wish people could explain why everyone has such love of Loghain.

He has nothing but paranoid ravings to justify his actions in DAO - not counting DLC since people were all over him from the word go. Meredith is suspicious of the mages but at least she has justificiation in game for why she is suspicious.

Loghain betrays a king and starts a civil war in the face of a "foreign" invasion based on his paranoid beliefs. In game, he does nothing to counter the darkspawn invasion so he basically leaves his people to die. Meredith is strict but never resorts to open violence until a mage blows up the Chantry. Her actions might not be the most correct since Anders isn't part of the circle but they aren't that hard to understand.

I get in your example how in his story he is a hero doing something heroic but Merdeith is every bit as much a hero in her mind and based on what they do and how they act in game Meredith is really a lot more reasonable than Loghain.


Nothing but paranoid ravings? are you serious? So would you be fine with letting 20,000 foreign soldiers in your lands then? from a superpower known for its history of conquest.. One that has in the past conquered that very country.. Unless you seriously believe there is no cause for concern and they will simply battle the blight and go home.. Tell that to Nevarra who were conquered by Orlais after they saved them from the third blight

Betrays his King? pray tell how he did that please, All I saw was Loghain quit the field after the battle was clearly lost due to the fact the darkspawn host was significantly larger than anticipated and the signal was so dalayed. If he charged the field with his men he would have lost the entire army instead of just a large portion of it. He wouldn't have even gotten to Cailan in time.
For a better analysis of Ostagar and why Loghain's withdrawl is justified see here
social.bioware.com/56308/blog/10285/

It wasn't even Loghain that started the civil war, it was Teagan and the banns when they refused to provide soldiers to the army to battle the darkspawn and because they refused to accept a "commoner" as their ruler

Does nothing to counter the darkspawn invasion? Then what do you call his alliance with uldred to get the mages on side? What do you call his selling elves to Tevinter to fund and maintain his army, what do you call the talk of him sending out press gangs and conscripting the populace?

I find it baffleing you find it easier to understand Meredith than Loghain tbh

Modifié par XxDeonxX, 17 décembre 2013 - 01:15 .


#254
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages
How is it that the size of the darkspawn horde was larger than anticipated, if Loghain sent out scouts earlier?

The rebellion has nothing to do with Loghain's status as a "commoner", he's well-loved for his past heroics. It has everything to do with the suspicious circumstances surrounding his retreat (whether or not they are accurate is irrelevent), not to mention that he actively threatened the banns with violence. Was that genius move supposed to win him friends?

Not to mention he poisoned Eamon completely out of hand.

XxDeonxX wrote...
what do you call his alliance with uldred to get the mages on side? What do you call his selling elves to Tevinter to fund and maintain his army, what do you call the talk of him sending out press gangs and conscripting the populace?

I call these moronic dick moves that make him look like an insane tyrant and cause him to lose the support of the public.

Modifié par Plaintiff, 17 décembre 2013 - 01:11 .


#255
Sidney

Sidney
  • Members
  • 5 032 messages
There is no evidence in game of any Orleasian invasion unless I missed it (not couting RtO). Once you accept his form of crazy then yes, you can believe anything but again, in the game, there is nothing to support this incoming Orleasian invasion.

Oddly the whole reason for Loghain's opposition to outside help was that this wasn't a real blight. You can't have this both ways and say that he didn't want outside help and he saw the darkspawn horde was massive. Equally, there is diddly in the game based on those awful cutscenes to say the battle was lost from the get go. The analysis is nice if you draw the picture that way, again nothing in game to say that that is accurate plus even at that point "winning" might not be an option but saving the trapped forces (effecting some sort of a breakout) might have been possible if we are going to create pretend scenarios.

Loghain starts the civil war when his actions lead to the death of the king. He assumes power in basically a coup. He is an illegitimate ruler who then proceeds to poison and imprison his rivals. Yeah, he's a flippin' gem.

Loghain is busy building an army...to fight his civil war and to fend off the non-existent Orleasian invasion there is nothing there to say fight the darkspawn and he never does anything to counter them in game.

#256
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
I'm going to chip in here and say I'm playing DA:O for the first time. I just recruited Leliana, and one issue that's been bugging me slightly is that the characters seem to be flip-flopping somewhat on whether the battle was lost because it's a new Blight or because Loghain abandoned the king. I have no idea if Loghain had a legitimate reason to retreat or not. I suppose it'll get cleared up when I go talk to him.

#257
WhiteKnyght

WhiteKnyght
  • Members
  • 3 755 messages

XxDeonxX wrote...

One thing that really concerns me about Dragon Age Inquisition is the writing team dehumanizing the antagonist again like they did with Meredith.
When you give the villain motivations and reasons for their actions like with Loghain doing what he did for the sake of Ferelden's security it makes for a good antagonist who to some can even be sympathetic and agreeable and if not this they at least make for a good well written antagonist.
Meredith was like this at well up until a certain point where we had the whole "Red Lyrium just made her crazy" when this happens everything just sort of falls apart and you dont really care anymore, your just there to kill the crazy lady and w/e. Same with the Saren and the Reapers its not good, ME would have been so much better if Saren was simply a rogue spectre making a power play or something.
So please stop making your antagonists crazy, possessed and brainwashed. Because someone like Loghain is so so much better =D


ME3's ending(synthesis) proved Saren was never actually being controlled. He had a full understanding of the Reapers motives and was willfully cooperating to achieve that goal.

Synthesis =  Man and machine entertwined. A union of flesh and steel. The strengths of both, the weaknesses of neither.

Also Meredith was a fanatic before the Lyrium. It just made her paranoid and uninhibited.

Also Loghain was a ******. Plain and simple.

#258
wolfhowwl

wolfhowwl
  • Members
  • 3 727 messages
Loghain wasn't particularly well-written.

Unfortunately Meredith managed to be much worse. Red lyrium, hahaha.

#259
Augustei

Augustei
  • Members
  • 3 923 messages

Sidney wrote...

There is no evidence in game of any Orleasian invasion unless I missed it (not couting RtO). Once you accept his form of crazy then yes, you can believe anything but again, in the game, there is nothing to support this incoming Orleasian invasion.

Oddly the whole reason for Loghain's opposition to outside help was that this wasn't a real blight. You can't have this both ways and say that he didn't want outside help and he saw the darkspawn horde was massive. Equally, there is diddly in the game based on those awful cutscenes to say the battle was lost from the get go. The analysis is nice if you draw the picture that way, again nothing in game to say that that is accurate plus even at that point "winning" might not be an option but saving the trapped forces (effecting some sort of a breakout) might have been possible if we are going to create pretend scenarios.

Loghain starts the civil war when his actions lead to the death of the king. He assumes power in basically a coup. He is an illegitimate ruler who then proceeds to poison and imprison his rivals. Yeah, he's a flippin' gem.

Loghain is busy building an army...to fight his civil war and to fend off the non-existent Orleasian invasion there is nothing there to say fight the darkspawn and he never does anything to counter them in game.


There may not have been solid evidence it was going to happen, but the risks were substantial, there were many historical precedences already established.

He saw the army the darkspawn had fielded at Ostagar was much larger than anticipated, he thought it was a large raid and not a blight how is this contradictory? What the cutscenes did reveal is that the darkspawn had broken through the Ferelden armies ranks and it was total chaos down there... Armys dont last very long at all under pressure like that.
Saving the trapped forces would likely have lossed him more troops than it would have gained him anyway, and even if this not be the case the risks were to high to gamble what forces he had left like that.

The Kings actions lead to the death of the King. Cailan insisted on fighting on the frontlines despite Loghains constant warnings not to. He poisoned Eamon before Ostagar as stated by David Gaider. He had no intention of killing him which is why he placed the elf Berwick in redcliffe so that should things go south he could give him the antidote. He wanted to remove Eamon from play since Eamon was exerting massive influence over Calian (and against Loghain as we saw in RTO where he's trying to get him to leave Anora)

He was ruling in the name of his daughter so he's not necessarily illegitimate, Anora was the Queen-Regeant already on the throne.

He cant effectively fight the darkspawn while simultaneously fighting the nobles in the civil war he tried to avert anyway. Its true he didn't think it a blight so his plan was as he stated to bring the Nobles back into line and then with a united Ferelden defeat the Darkspawn.

The Orlesian invasion was a real potential threat, just because the Chevaliers weren't crossing his borders and felling the strategic castles does that mean he shouldn't take precautions?

The Grey Nayr wrote...

ME3's ending(synthesis) proved
Saren was never actually being controlled. He had a full understanding
of the Reapers motives and was willfully cooperating to achieve that
goal.

Synthesis =  Man and machine entertwined. A union of flesh and steel. The strengths of both, the weaknesses of neither.

Also Meredith was a fanatic before the Lyrium. It just made her paranoid and uninhibited.

Also Loghain was a ******. Plain and simple.


Those choices wouldn't have been presented if Shepard hadn't gotten as far as he did though, The Reapers wouldn't have allowed Synthesis back in ME1 their initial plans were still acceptable as far as they were concerned and so they planned to eradicate all life. Saren wasn't willfully co-operating.. Otherwise why would he consider and in some cases actually kill himself.. Why would he have such doubts initially when Shepard raises them to him only for them to be suddenly and completely removed after he let them impant him.

Just because Loghain's plans failed doesn't make him a ******.. Many great people in history have failed in the end.

wolfhowwl wrote...

Loghain wasn't particularly well-written.


He was the best written character in the game IMO

Modifié par XxDeonxX, 17 décembre 2013 - 01:43 .


#260
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages
Grey Nayr...

Wow.

That's some serious Seival level delusion there. Erezike style even.

Next you're going to tell me that the Normandy crash site is fake.

#261
Star fury

Star fury
  • Members
  • 6 403 messages

David7204 wrote...

I'm going to chip in here and say I'm playing DA:O for the first time. I just recruited Leliana, and one issue that's been bugging me slightly is that the characters seem to be flip-flopping somewhat on whether the battle was lost because it's a new Blight or because Loghain abandoned the king. I have no idea if Loghain had a legitimate reason to retreat or not. I suppose it'll get cleared up when I go talk to him.



Image IPB

You're going to finish it when DA4 will be released.

#262
Sylvius the Mad

Sylvius the Mad
  • Members
  • 24 112 messages

David7204 wrote...

I'm going to chip in here and say I'm playing DA:O for the first time. I just recruited Leliana, and one issue that's been bugging me slightly is that the characters seem to be flip-flopping somewhat on whether the battle was lost because it's a new Blight or because Loghain abandoned the king. I have no idea if Loghain had a legitimate reason to retreat or not. I suppose it'll get cleared up when I go talk to him.

I applaud your reserve.

You're entirely right - the PC doesn't have any real knowledge about Loghain's motives.  The PC doesn't even necessarily have first-hand knowledge of the retreat; he heard about it from Morrigan.

#263
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

The Grey Nayr wrote...

ME3's ending(synthesis) proved Saren was never actually being controlled. He had a full understanding of the Reapers motives and was willfully cooperating to achieve that goal.

Synthesis =  Man and machine entertwined. A union of flesh and steel. The strengths of both, the weaknesses of neither.

Also Meredith was a fanatic before the Lyrium. It just made her paranoid and uninhibited.

Also Loghain was a ******. Plain and simple.


Not enough facepalms

#264
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 932 messages
lol

#265
GreyLycanTrope

GreyLycanTrope
  • Members
  • 12 709 messages

David7204 wrote...

I'm going to chip in here and say I'm playing DA:O for the first time. I just recruited Leliana, and one issue that's been bugging me slightly is that the characters seem to be flip-flopping somewhat on whether the battle was lost because it's a new Blight or because Loghain abandoned the king. I have no idea if Loghain had a legitimate reason to retreat or not. I suppose it'll get cleared up when I go talk to him.

The arguement stays very much in the air from what I remember, on one hand you have the lot saying the battle would've been lost anyway since the Fereldan army was too small to beat the horde, others were more optimistic about the prospects of victory, it very much remains a what if scenario steeped in the characters' personal view point as opposed to an actual answer on whether the fight was doomed from the start. In either scenario though Loghain's still very much at least one of the key figures to blame for the loss as he set up theKing for a fall and objected against waiting for Orleasian reinforcements, his motivations do get brought up later though.

#266
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Greylycantrope wrote...

David7204 wrote...

I'm going to chip in here and say I'm playing DA:O for the first time. I just recruited Leliana, and one issue that's been bugging me slightly is that the characters seem to be flip-flopping somewhat on whether the battle was lost because it's a new Blight or because Loghain abandoned the king. I have no idea if Loghain had a legitimate reason to retreat or not. I suppose it'll get cleared up when I go talk to him.

The arguement stays very much in the air from what I remember, on one hand you have the lot saying the battle would've been lost anyway since the Fereldan army was too small to beat the horde, others were more optimistic about the prospects of victory, it very much remains a what if scenario steeped in the characters' personal view point as opposed to an actual answer on whether the fight was doomed from the start. In either scenario though Loghain's still very much at least one of the key figures to blame for the loss as he set up theKing for a fall and objected against waiting for Orleasian reinforcements, his motivations do get brought up later though.


Indeed. It's not so much as the plot point is never resolved as it is simply giving a conflicting view of the possibilities. 

You get different perspectives on whether or not the battle could have been won or not throughout the game. 

It's like Market Garden, one of the biggest failures for the Allies in WWII. Field Marshal Montgomery to his dying day believed the Operation would've succeeded if he had the armor and air support he needed, while others believed that it was doomed to failure from the beginning. Of course, one of the biggest reasons for the actual failure is Montgomery's own mismanagement.

#267
trafficpenaltytribunal

trafficpenaltytribunal
  • Members
  • 10 messages
Til the last part of the last act, Meredith sounded more like she felt she was doing the best she could to protect the populace - "Champion, what would you have me do?" was the most emotional line in the game for me, and I always had more sympathy for her than Orsino.

Orsino felt like a wrong'un from the start - perhaps more hints earlier on - whereas the Meredith switch from person whose methods you might not like to madwoman felt more mechanical - necessary for the game rather than coming from the evolving personality. That's the only part I didn't like.

While waiting between replays of DA:O and DA:II, I'm still looking forward to DA:I. Bioware (and Bethesda) still seem to churn out stories worth finishing.

#268
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

XxDeonxX wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

Vicious wrote...

Meredith was just like Mellisan from Throne of Bhaal. (they both wore a hood for no reason too!) You could tell she was going to be a villain from the get go,but had to play nice up until the moment where she started raving like a lunatic.

She was one of Bioware's worst villains. Unsurprisingly so was Meredith - she was not two dimensional. They tried, barely, by giving her some backstory of her family turning into abominations, but it may as well have been throwaday dialogue because it had nothing to do with her turning evil - it was all the idol's fault.


I would not say it's just the idols fault. Remeber she was planning to take down the circle way before she got the idol. That was the reason she got it in the first place. It just made her form bad to worst. Added, there really was an issue of blood mages in the city, she just looked into the wrong place and the one templar that understood were it was was ignored cause Hawke to lose his mother. And the circle head was helping to hide the blood mage problem.

The cause of everything was not Meredith, Orseno, or the Idol alone. It's the fact that both the templers and Mages were no working togehter andantagonistict to one another. The idol did not cause the fire, it only poured oil on it.


Then why didn't she sent for the right of annulment until Act 3 after she got the lyrium sword? and she never states anything about buying the red lyrium to take down the circle? Your drawing false conclusions based on no evidence at all. Theres nothing to indicate she planned to take down the circle before act 3

1.She says she got it to take down the tower the moment she shows you the sword.
2.Clearly, it was something as a last option. Remeber, she also has to go to the grand clearic first before even starting. It was the word of the first clearic to wait and try to work on other options.

#269
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

The Hierophant wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

The Hierophant wrote...

leaguer of one, can you post a link that indicates that Meredith was intent on taking down the CoM, since her refusal to ok Alrik's Tranquil Solution seems to be contradictory before she purchased the idol before the start of Act 2?


Why do you even think she got the red lyrium in the first place?  She tell you she was planning it for year the very moment she pulls out her red lyrium sword.

iirc outside of speculation Meredith didn't give a reason as to why she chose to purchase the idol. Her intent on forging it into a sword afterwards is another matter.

Wrong, she tells you in act 3. She took the lyrium idol to make a sword out of it spacificly. It not a case she plan to after she bought the idol.

#270
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

I honestly don't recall.
Probably because I wasn't doing Cerberus-related side missions in ME1, since I found them boring.

That said I VASTLY prefer the ME2 Cerberus (partially, because it tends to swing around in ME2 too) than ME1 and ME3.


That's the thing. Cerberus in ME2 was clearly trying to manipulate Shepard. They are just used the excuse of moral grey to justify their actions.


That's how YOU see things.
Others disagree.
That's the funny thing about morality.

The way I see it was that Cerberus *was* moraly grey - until the devs ruined that compeltely by writing incompetence of stellar magnitude.

Wrong. We have 3 other teams of cerberus to look at in ME2 on that notion. One was trying to mind contol another race. Another,was studing a reaper coupse in the worst way possible which TIM knew it was going to end with there death. And then we have the team on Trident who were experimenting on live Alien subjects...
http://masseffect.wi...ered_on_Trident

Sorry, but Cerberus be moraly grey is an illusion TIm wanted you to see.

#271
Augustei

Augustei
  • Members
  • 3 923 messages

leaguer of one wrote...

XxDeonxX wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

Vicious wrote...

Meredith was just like Mellisan from Throne of Bhaal. (they both wore a hood for no reason too!) You could tell she was going to be a villain from the get go,but had to play nice up until the moment where she started raving like a lunatic.

She was one of Bioware's worst villains. Unsurprisingly so was Meredith - she was not two dimensional. They tried, barely, by giving her some backstory of her family turning into abominations, but it may as well have been throwaday dialogue because it had nothing to do with her turning evil - it was all the idol's fault.


I would not say it's just the idols fault. Remeber she was planning to take down the circle way before she got the idol. That was the reason she got it in the first place. It just made her form bad to worst. Added, there really was an issue of blood mages in the city, she just looked into the wrong place and the one templar that understood were it was was ignored cause Hawke to lose his mother. And the circle head was helping to hide the blood mage problem.

The cause of everything was not Meredith, Orseno, or the Idol alone. It's the fact that both the templers and Mages were no working togehter andantagonistict to one another. The idol did not cause the fire, it only poured oil on it.


Then why didn't she sent for the right of annulment until Act 3 after she got the lyrium sword? and she never states anything about buying the red lyrium to take down the circle? Your drawing false conclusions based on no evidence at all. Theres nothing to indicate she planned to take down the circle before act 3

1.She says she got it to take down the tower the moment she shows you the sword.
2.Clearly, it was something as a last option. Remeber, she also has to go to the grand clearic first before even starting. It was the word of the first clearic to wait and try to work on other options.

1. She never says that at all. No idea what game you were playing but it clearly wasn't Dragon Age 2
2. And the higher ups can overrule the grand cleric, If the divine approves it she doesnt need the grand cleric.. and still she didn't send for it until act 3. Thus the point still stands

#272
leaguer of one

leaguer of one
  • Members
  • 9 995 messages

XxDeonxX wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

XxDeonxX wrote...

leaguer of one wrote...

Vicious wrote...

Meredith was just like Mellisan from Throne of Bhaal. (they both wore a hood for no reason too!) You could tell she was going to be a villain from the get go,but had to play nice up until the moment where she started raving like a lunatic.

She was one of Bioware's worst villains. Unsurprisingly so was Meredith - she was not two dimensional. They tried, barely, by giving her some backstory of her family turning into abominations, but it may as well have been throwaday dialogue because it had nothing to do with her turning evil - it was all the idol's fault.


I would not say it's just the idols fault. Remeber she was planning to take down the circle way before she got the idol. That was the reason she got it in the first place. It just made her form bad to worst. Added, there really was an issue of blood mages in the city, she just looked into the wrong place and the one templar that understood were it was was ignored cause Hawke to lose his mother. And the circle head was helping to hide the blood mage problem.

The cause of everything was not Meredith, Orseno, or the Idol alone. It's the fact that both the templers and Mages were no working togehter andantagonistict to one another. The idol did not cause the fire, it only poured oil on it.


Then why didn't she sent for the right of annulment until Act 3 after she got the lyrium sword? and she never states anything about buying the red lyrium to take down the circle? Your drawing false conclusions based on no evidence at all. Theres nothing to indicate she planned to take down the circle before act 3

1.She says she got it to take down the tower the moment she shows you the sword.
2.Clearly, it was something as a last option. Remeber, she also has to go to the grand clearic first before even starting. It was the word of the first clearic to wait and try to work on other options.

1. She never says that at all. No idea what game you were playing but it clearly wasn't Dragon Age 2
2. And the higher ups can overrule the grand cleric, If the divine approves it she doesnt need the grand cleric.. and still she didn't send for it until act 3. Thus the point still stands

1.She the moment she show the lyrium sword. Rewatch the scene in DA2.
2.We already know the Divine is already trying to avoide a fight so clearly even the Divine not going to ok it, she would ask the grand clearic if the circle is that drastic. Story short, Miridith could not just Annual the circle because both the Divine and the grand clearic did not see the need to.

#273
Augustei

Augustei
  • Members
  • 3 923 messages
1. No she doesn't, stop making things up. All she says is she bought it from bartrand for a high price. She never says she bought it to bring down the circle YOU need to rewatch it.
2. Whether the Divine would support it or not is irrelevant.. The point is there is absolutely no proof at all she was trying to bring down the circle before act 3.

#274
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 988 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

How is it that the size of the darkspawn horde was larger than anticipated, if Loghain sent out scouts earlier?


Many of the scouts were killed. What ones returned either managed to give a decent approximation of what they saw or were too panicked to say anything coherent. It varies, though I think the scouts were killed more and more in the later attempts to understand what was happening.

Scouting parties are usually very small, and while they can maneuver easily through an army they can still be taken by surprise. Some of them might've even gotten careless.

But just because a scout says there are going to be 2,000 foes in the field (as an example) doesn't mean there will really be 2,000 foes in the field. Things change in war. The one certainty about war is that nothing is certain.

Which seems contradictory, but meh.

), not to mention that he actively threatened the banns with violence. Was that genius move supposed to win him friends?


No (it certainly wasn't smart), but considering the Darkspawn were the priority the Bannorn's desire to place petty politics over uniting under Loghain's banner -- whatever misgivings they had about him, they should've realized he was the lesser of two evils (though I do not find him evil) -- is really damning of them.

As a result of this new front, Loghain had to turn his attention to fighting the Bannorn so that he could then focus his attention down south against the Darkspawn. If he had marshalled his forces and marched against the Darkspawn then, the Bannorn would've attacked him in the rear.

The more fronts a person fights a war on, the less likely their chances of victory.

Even more damning of the Bannorn is that they had no centralized leadership. It was literally every bann for himself, because they didn't even begin to think they should come together. Most would get their asses handed to them by Loghain, and on the rare instance a bann did manage to defeat Loghain's forces they would find that their residual forces were sufficiently inadequate to face the Darkspawn.

Not to mention he poisoned Eamon completely out of hand.


Out of hand implies he had no legitimate reasons for it.

He did.

Eamon is hardly a saint after all.

Plaintiff wrote...

XxDeonxX wrote...
what do you call his alliance with uldred to get the mages on side? What do you call his selling elves to Tevinter to fund and maintain his army, what do you call the talk of him sending out press gangs and conscripting the populace?


I call these moronic dick moves that make him look like an insane tyrant and cause him to lose the support of the public.


Press gangs are not a "moronic dick move". They're necessary to rebuilding an army in a time of war. Eamon does much the same thing to rebuild his own forces.

Making an alliance with Uldred and promising the Mages greater rights in return for aiding him against the Darkspawn is not a moronic dick move. He would've had a greater asset in the war effort as well as the support of the Formari and Lucrosians, who could've helped generate revenue for the war chest.

Since that was a no-go and the Bannorn's Civil War went on and on -- coupled with Howe's embezzling -- detracting from the war chest, slavery (distasteful as it was) was the only option. At the time the Warden intervenes, a few dozen Elves had been shipped off to Tevinter and the war chest was 1/3 of the way full. Had it continued, the war chest could've been replenished entirely.

Loghain makes it a point, if recruited (at which point there's no reason for him to lie because the man doesn't give a **** what people think of him and actively encourages you to be spiteful towards him), to say that he would've armed the main army and then armed the remaining Elves in the Alienage so they could defend themselves.

That's on top of his question of what's worse, to live as a slave or die without hope.

Is it a pretty solution? No. Is it one I can necessarily condemn or approve of? Again, no, because it wasn't done For the Evulz like Orlais did. There were reasons. Is it one I might've made, had I been in his exact situation and done the exact things he'd done prior to it all? Probably.

Howe was more then likely the one who suggested the idea in the first place, FWIW. The man cares nothing for the lives of the Elves, viewing them as little more then animals.

The only one that can be called a dick move that will create a loss of support is the slavery one.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 19 décembre 2013 - 07:05 .


#275
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

leaguer of one wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

The way I see it was that Cerberus *was* moraly grey - until the devs ruined that compeltely by writing incompetence of stellar magnitude.


Wrong. We have 3 other teams of cerberus to look at in ME2 on that notion. One was trying to mind contol another race. Another,was studing a reaper coupse in the worst way possible which TIM knew it was going to end with there death. And then we have the team on Trident who were experimenting on live Alien subjects...
http://masseffect.wi...ered_on_Trident

Sorry, but Cerberus be moraly grey is an illusion TIm wanted you to see.


Not wrong.
What part of "writing incompetence" escapes you?

That writing incompetence didn't suddely start in ME3. ME2 is full of it. The Lazarus? The Entire unnecessary Shep death? The Bay reaper? Etc, etc..