905 réponses à ce sujet

[Splinter Cell 108]

Seival wrote...


Not even close to K:SF.

Also, TW3 will not be a "PC achievement". It will be a cross-platform game developed mainly for the consoles. And most likely it will terribly lag on top-end PCs.

Yes that's right, TW3 is ten times better. I don't think you really know anything about PC. Even if it is multiplatform, PC is and has always been the main event of The Witcher. 

Continue spouting nonsense though, it seems nothing is likely to stop you. Anyone who goes this long with these arguments is clearly out of their minds or trying really hard. 

Modifié par Splinter Cell 108, 19 décembre 2013 - 11:09 .

[Gravisanimi]

Guys, why art thou trying to smash your Ferrari's and Lamborghini's against Sevail's Concrete Barriers of Stubbornness?

[Seival]

Splinter Cell 108 wrote...

Seival wrote...


Not even close to K:SF.

Also, TW3 will not be a "PC achievement". It will be a cross-platform game developed mainly for the consoles. And most likely it will terribly lag on top-end PCs.

Yes that's right, TW3 is ten times better. I don't think you really know anything about PC. Even if it is multiplatform, PC is and has always been the main event of The Witcher. 

Continue spouting nonsense though, it seems nothing is likely to stop you. Anyone who goes this long with these arguments is clearly out of their minds or trying really hard. 

It is not. It is noticeably worse than K:SF.

I know about PC enough to realize that the platform will be an abuse for TW3.

[Liamv2]

Gravisanimi wrote...

Guys, why art thou trying to smash your Ferrari's and Lamborghini's against Sevail's Concrete Barriers of Stubbornness?

I don't know. Perhaps this is a sign that I have gone mad.

[Splinter Cell 108]

Gravisanimi wrote...

Guys, why art thou trying to smash your Ferrari's and Lamborghini's against Sevail's Concrete Barriers of Stubbornness?

This is the statement of the thread, everyone should stop wasting their time here, its clear this nonsense will not stop, why argue over it?

[Seival]

Splinter Cell 108 wrote...

Gravisanimi wrote...

Guys, why art thou trying to smash your Ferrari's and Lamborghini's against Sevail's Concrete Barriers of Stubbornness?

This is the statement of the thread, everyone should stop wasting their time here, its clear this nonsense will not stop, why argue over it?

The pure essence of BSN.

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

Seival wrote...
Critics are not trustworthy nowadays.
Some vocal players do not know what are they talking about.

So because I don't agree with your opinion I clearly don't know what I'm talking about?

I like this question. Because it can be returned to a person who asked it without losing it's meaning, and as an actual answer to the question.

[Cyonan]

I like how you're willing to use that question on other people when you yourself are guilty of it.

[Seival]

AresKeith wrote...

Greylycantrope wrote...

Seival wrote...

Liamv2 wrote...

Metro last light. A game I really need to get round to getting.

Before you start playing... it's a cross-platform game, and it's not a next-gen game. PC isn't the primary platform it was designed for. If you are OK with that - proceed

Almost as funny as when you suggested modding should be prohibited, sounds like you're hating on PCs because you're jelly.

He probably couldn't afford a gaming PC so now he's bashing it and praising consoles

I can, and I'm an owner of almost-top-end PC right now. The problem is in lack of good PC games, not in lack of affordable hardware. So, basically I have an expensive workstation and two consoles. Workstation for work and training, and consoles for gaming. Suits me very well.

[Seival]

Cyonan wrote...

I like how you're willing to use that question on other people when you yourself are guilty of it.

This question is two-edged. Just like all the argument here, and in any other thread like this one.

Modifié par Seival, 19 décembre 2013 - 11:35 .

[Cyonan]

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

I like how you're willing to use that question on other people when you yourself are guilty of it.

These question is two-edged. Just like all the argument here, and in any other thread like this one.

The question is actually just another way of saying you're being arrogant by claiming that other people's opinions are wrong because they're different from your own.

Being guilty of that while also using it against other people just makes you a hypocrite.

[Liamv2]

The Mad Hanar wrote...

 A visual metaphor:

Snip

You seem to have a knack for winning threads. 

[ruggly]

The Mad Hanar wrote...

 A visual metaphor:

[Seival]

Cyonan wrote...

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

I like how you're willing to use that question on other people when you yourself are guilty of it.

These question is two-edged. Just like all the argument here, and in any other thread like this one.

The question is actually just another way of saying you're being arrogant by claiming that other people's opinions are wrong because they're different from your own.

Being guilty of that while also using it against other people just makes you a hypocrite.

And you just did the same thing that you claimed I did. Based an emotional responce on your attitude towards my opinion.

The world of different opinions.
None is true.
Everything is permitted.

[Seival]

simfamSP wrote...

^

It's the result of DA:I, NME and this new IP thing being silent.

NME will probably be the most silent of them all. I can imagine what will happen on the BSN after NME announcement.

Well, I just hope that NME will be truly great next-gen game developed with really high modern standards of quality.

Modifié par Seival, 19 décembre 2013 - 11:53 .

[Cyonan]

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

I like how you're willing to use that question on other people when you yourself are guilty of it.

These question is two-edged. Just like all the argument here, and in any other thread like this one.

The question is actually just another way of saying you're being arrogant by claiming that other people's opinions are wrong because they're different from your own.

Being guilty of that while also using it against other people just makes you a hypocrite.

And you just did the same thing that you claimed I did. Based an emotional responce on your attitude towards my opinion.

The world of different opinions.
None is true.
Everything is permitted.

I'm not saying anything about basing emotional responses on attitudes of other's opinions.

I am saying that you made claims of other people's opinions being wrong and that they don't know what they're talking about because they disagree with you.

My opinion is that you're a fanboy who refuses to admit that anything Sony might possibly not be perfect, but I'm not saying that you're wrong in thinking that story and graphics are the most important thing in gaming. I'm also not saying you're right, either.

Although according to you, if I think a Super Mario game on the WiiU is better than Killzone I have no idea what I'm talking about and must be wrong.

[Ravensword]

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

I like how you're willing to use that question on other people when you yourself are guilty of it.

These question is two-edged. Just like all the argument here, and in any other thread like this one.

The question is actually just another way of saying you're being arrogant by claiming that other people's opinions are wrong because they're different from your own.

Being guilty of that while also using it against other people just makes you a hypocrite.

And you just did the same thing that you claimed I did. Based an emotional responce on your attitude towards my opinion.

The world of different opinions.
None is true.
Everything is permitted.

Friedrich Nietzsche just turned over in his grave.

Modifié par Ravensword, 20 décembre 2013 - 12:08 .

[Seival]

Cyonan wrote...

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

Seival wrote...

Cyonan wrote...

I like how you're willing to use that question on other people when you yourself are guilty of it.

These question is two-edged. Just like all the argument here, and in any other thread like this one.

The question is actually just another way of saying you're being arrogant by claiming that other people's opinions are wrong because they're different from your own.

Being guilty of that while also using it against other people just makes you a hypocrite.

And you just did the same thing that you claimed I did. Based an emotional responce on your attitude towards my opinion.

The world of different opinions.
None is true.
Everything is permitted.

I'm not saying anything about basing emotional responses on attitudes of other's opinions.

I am saying that you made claims of other people's opinions being wrong and that they don't know what they're talking about because they disagree with you.

My opinion is that you're a fanboy who refuses to admit that anything Sony might possibly not be perfect, but I'm not saying that you're wrong in thinking that story and graphics are the most important thing in gaming. I'm also not saying you're right, either.

Although according to you, if I think a Super Mario game on the WiiU is better than Killzone I have no idea what I'm talking about and must be wrong.

Other persons here and in other threads also made claims of my opinion being wrong. So why are you saying that to me? It's easier to speak to one person than to 20 of them? Wanna be fair? Be fair by 100% then. Tell others the same thing, do not adress that only to me.