The Harrier is greatest thing Bioware ever gave ME3MP

#26
DHKany

Posté 13 décembre 2013 - 11:52

Members
8 023 messages

lol.

Retour en haut

#27
Dr. Tim Whatley

Posté 13 décembre 2013 - 11:54

Members
7 543 messages

Max Dmian wrote...

Talon doesn't have the Harrier's range and DPS. Hurricane suffers from inaccuracy and therefore doesn't have the Harrier's range.
They're all more or less on the same level.
Liking or loving it is perfectly understandable but doesn't make it "less cheap" or significantly "more balanced" than the weapons mentioned.

Agreed.

Retour en haut

#28
MajorStupidity

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:00

Members
1 923 messages

The harrier is one of the most effective, and yet the most boring weapon in the game. It is literally a generic assault rifle. Yes it is effective, but it really just is not very interesting. Personally I love the lancer's firing sound the most.

Do we really need to commend bioware on delivering a fully automatic mattock to ME3 when there are so many more weapons with a much more interesting design (disregard power of the weapon).

Retour en haut

#29
Kel Riever

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:01

Members
7 065 messages

Reegar w/Incendiary > Harrier.

Lolgunsyouneedtoaim.

Retour en haut

#30
HusarX

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:03

Members
2 042 messages

Great gun, one of my favs.

Retour en haut

#31
Moby

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:06

Members
5 303 messages

All that and you never use it... :whistle:

Retour en haut

#32
MR CauSe iM GoD

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:07

Members
192 messages

Prefer Lancer VI over Harrier X.

Retour en haut

#33
megabeast37215

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:11

Members
13 626 messages

Max Dmian wrote...

Talon doesn't have the Harrier's range and DPS. Hurricane suffers from inaccuracy and therefore doesn't have the Harrier's range.
They're all more or less on the same level.
Liking or loving it is perfectly understandable but doesn't make it "less cheap" or significantly "more balanced" than the weapons mentioned.

The range limitations of those weapons can be mitigated by popping into hard cover when you desire to engage at longer ranges. Most people seem to forget that since soft cover rules the day... But there are advantages to using hard cover from time to time. Learning to use the Punisher on non accuracy kits taught me this... Engaging Primes did also, they're stupidly easy if you use hard cover.

Retour en haut

#34
megabeast37215

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:13

Members
13 626 messages

MofuggerX wrote...

All that and you never use it...

The only thing that keeps the Harrier GI on the shuttle so often is the lack of AR amps... They are my URs. I even get respec cards more than those...

Retour en haut

#35
Max Dmian

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:16

Members
2 105 messages

True, hard cover helps - but even if you could keep firing from cover without being shot at (which is...not that often), you still wouldn't get the range of a Harrier firing from soft cover.
I mean, that's one of its greatest strengths, intended or not - its insane accuracy for a gun that powerful.

Modifié par Max Dmian, 14 décembre 2013 - 12:19 .

Retour en haut

#36
megabeast37215

Posté 14 décembre 2013 - 12:17

Members
13 626 messages

Max Dmian wrote...

True, hard cover helps - but even if you could keep firing from cover without being shot at (which is...not that often), you still wouldn't get the range of a Harrier firing from soft cover.

Also true. ^_^