Why The Hell Is Calin Fighting On The Frontline?
#1
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 06:54
#2
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 06:55
#3
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 06:57
Modifié par errant_knight, 20 janvier 2010 - 07:00 .
#4
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:01
#5
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:01
In any case, Cailan is young, full of himself, and full of glory stories of war. I don't think the possibility that he might die was too strong in his head, though there are the speculations that he made allowances for that probability when getting the tower beacon lit. He never really thought they would lose, having the Grey Wardens at his side and Loghain to back him up.
#6
Guest_Colenda_*
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:02
Guest_Colenda_*
GmanFresh wrote...
He is the freaking king.... in stolen throne maric stood a ways back....its should have been logain leading the force and Calian waiting for the beacon...
Loghain told him leading the men in person was a bad idea. So naturally King Blondie McBrain decides that the front line is where he's got to be. He should have stuck to looking pretty and waving for the cameras.
#7
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:24
#8
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:30
Cailan was a great fool.
#9
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:38
Different story if he'd had heirs; I imagine it would have been easy for Anora to continue reigning with minimal opposition if she was the mother to the future King/Queen.
Modifié par Harelda, 20 janvier 2010 - 07:39 .
#10
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:41
Modifié par Ulicus, 20 janvier 2010 - 07:42 .
#11
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:45
#12
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:56
#13
Guest_Colenda_*
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 07:59
Guest_Colenda_*
Lord Phoebus wrote...
He should have had an elite personal guard surrounding him,but taking the field and even fighting isn't unheard of for a king. Alexander the Great is probably the most famous example of this, but William the Conquerer and Harold the II both took the field at Hastings, Richard I fought in many battles and Richard the III took the field at Bosworth (and was the last British king to die in battle).
The last English king. I believe that one of the Scottish Kings fell at Flodden, in 1513. (eta: it was James IV)
However, I agree with your overall point. At the Battle of Shrewsbury, both the King and his eldest son took to the field, both surviving, but rather too closely for comfort - the scar on the portrait of Henry V is a testament to that.
Modifié par Colenda, 20 janvier 2010 - 08:09 .
#14
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:18
Lord Phoebus wrote...
He should have had an elite personal guard surrounding him,but taking the field and even fighting isn't unheard of for a king. Alexander the Great is probably the most famous example of this, but William the Conquerer and Harold the II both took the field at Hastings, Richard I fought in many battles and Richard the III took the field at Bosworth (and was the last British king to die in battle).
Calin did have an elite bodyguard around him, the Grey Wardens he was fighting with.
#15
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:28
#16
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:29
#17
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:43
#18
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:43
#19
Posté 20 janvier 2010 - 08:58
The KIng presence on the battlefield inspires the troops.
During the Civil War most of the generals were seen on the battlefield leading and ordering the troops. During WWII, Patton and Rommel each had their own tanks to drive up to the battlefield. Sometimes Patton would take his jeep! It gave them a first hand view of the battle.





Retour en haut






