CosmicGnosis wrote...
Lots of support for freedom on BSN.
Not in my experience, but YMMV. I find it interesting how many people are completely comfortable with totalitarian behavior if it benefits them personally.
CosmicGnosis wrote...
So I'm curious: Is it ethical to condemn the krogan based on Wreav's behavior? He seems to represent everything that is wrong with their culture, but no matter how bad the krogan are, do they deserve to be "controlled"? Because they might subjugate others, they must be subjugated. All of them. Their entire species must be violated and humiliated.
It's a difficult question, but to quote a famous actor, 'deserves' has got nothing to do with it. Normally I'd say that no, you don't condemn an entire people for the behavior of one individual. Problem in this case is that the one individual in question is their leader and will set the tone for their entire foreign policy. It might be that in order for others to be free, the various militaries of the galaxy will have to keep a lid on the Krogan. After all, humans, asari, turians, salarians, and all others, have a right to live free of the predations of marauding Krogan.
Basically, I look at it like this: you can do anything you want, as long as it 'neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg'. But if it does do one of those, then I have the right to stop you with force, either as an individual defending myself, or as a society using its armed forces to repel invaders and curtail threats by possible invaders.
CosmicGnosis wrote...
I suppose I'm asking this: Is it hypocritical to so staunchly support the freedom of various people and societies, but then support sabotaging the genophage cure because Wreav is in charge?
It's not about Wreav being in charge. It's about what he's planning to do. If his plans involve carpet bombing other people's cities and raiding their colonies, he should not be surprised when those he's threatening responds to that, as is their right (indeed, it is not just the right, but the duty, of human, asari, turian, etc, military forces to protect their sovereignty against such attacks). I also (and so does a society) have the right to do this preemptively once a potential enemy's goals are clearly known.
CosmicGnosis wrote...
Padok Wiks, on the other hand, believes that Nature should be free, and if the natural course of things allows the krogan to dominate the galaxy, then so be it.
Padok Wiks is uttering nonsense. "Nature" is not a conscious force, and does not have a grand "plan". The only "plan" it has is natural selection, which is not a conscious plan, it's merely a consequence of a natural world that is competitive.
Supporting freedom does not mean one cedes his freedom to someone else. Quite the opposite in fact. Supporting freedom means you get to defend it if someone tries to take it from you.
Modifié par jamesp81, 16 décembre 2013 - 02:56 .