It's perfectly reasonable and justified for him to be optimistic. Even if he's wrong.
Modifié par David7204, 18 décembre 2013 - 01:10 .
Modifié par David7204, 18 décembre 2013 - 01:10 .
osbornep wrote...
In some ways, I think the writers were backed into a corner with the genophage. For one, I'm not exactly sure how it's supposed to work, since the mechanism seems to change from game to game. More importantly, though, I think the writers held back quite a bit on portraying the degree to which the Krogan just have a super-violent culture as compared to everyone else. We see some crazies, like the Clan Weyrloc guy, but they can always be rationalized as just individual nutjobs. This is a problem from the point of view of giving a balanced perspective on the genophage, since the whole motivation for it was supposed to be that the Krogan's intrinsic barbarism made diplomacy impossible.
At the same time, I can see why the writers might have been reluctant to make the Krogan seem as scary as they were supposed to be, since such a portrayal might have been seen to have affinities with the "scientific" racism of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, according to which members of certain ethnic groups were just more prone to violence, less intelligent, etc. than others. It's a tough bind from a writing point of view, and I don't know what the resolution to it is.
EDIT: Fixed paragraphs
Bourne Endeavor wrote...
The issue I found is how the Genophage devolved into a simple black and white scenario. Throughout Mass Effect's predecessors, you could take a predominantly neutral stance, in particular regarding ME2, whereas in ME3 any opinion not supporting a cure wholesale seemed to be subtlety hinted as wrong. Understandably, Wrex is bias on the subject, even if his opinion seems to have notably changed to hardline cure support.
I will say, Victis puts up the best argument both in favor and against the cure. Until that point we knew little of the brutality of the Krogan rebellion. He is in many ways similar to the player on the fence, thus giving pause to think. The Dalatras is useless, though I suspect her emotional response was intended. Her opinion works because of what Victis says.
Overall, I don't have too much to nitpick from the Genophage saga beyond the above. I support it, though because of Wrex, the Krogan deserve one chance. Eve only bolsters that, while Wreav can lead the Krogan to extinction.
Now what I do pick apart more is Rannoch because the Quarian are not only portrayed as hilariously racist to the now pure and innocent Geth. They are fundamentally incompetent and if it were not for the need for war assets and Tali, I would allow their idiocy to doom their species.
Not only do they start a war in the midst of a Galaxy wide genocide. They lacked the logistics to even win that war to begin with. Xen came up with a new scrambling device to give them an edge, and they never anticipated the Geth would find a counterattack of some sort?
wright1978 wrote...
Bourne Endeavor wrote...
The issue I found is how the Genophage devolved into a simple black and white scenario. Throughout Mass Effect's predecessors, you could take a predominantly neutral stance, in particular regarding ME2, whereas in ME3 any opinion not supporting a cure wholesale seemed to be subtlety hinted as wrong. Understandably, Wrex is bias on the subject, even if his opinion seems to have notably changed to hardline cure support.
I will say, Victis puts up the best argument both in favor and against the cure. Until that point we knew little of the brutality of the Krogan rebellion. He is in many ways similar to the player on the fence, thus giving pause to think. The Dalatras is useless, though I suspect her emotional response was intended. Her opinion works because of what Victis says.
Overall, I don't have too much to nitpick from the Genophage saga beyond the above. I support it, though because of Wrex, the Krogan deserve one chance. Eve only bolsters that, while Wreav can lead the Krogan to extinction.
Now what I do pick apart more is Rannoch because the Quarian are not only portrayed as hilariously racist to the now pure and innocent Geth. They are fundamentally incompetent and if it were not for the need for war assets and Tali, I would allow their idiocy to doom their species.
Not only do they start a war in the midst of a Galaxy wide genocide. They lacked the logistics to even win that war to begin with. Xen came up with a new scrambling device to give them an edge, and they never anticipated the Geth would find a counterattack of some sort?
Part of the problem with the Genophage is that they took the person who espoused the reasonable advocation of the genophage(mordin from ME2) & had him suddenly advocating a wholesale cure. It unbalanced any cure/not cure choice so i'm not at all surprised at the player cure statistics. I cured it based on the needs of the war coupled with a more reasonable 1st couple but if there wasn't a galactic extinction event occurring i think most of my Sheps would advocate a more targeted approach.
Rannoch reminds me a bit of DA2, in that thinking people would intrinsicially support the (Quarians/Mages), the portrayal they went for was to attempt to balance this perceived inherent standpoint.
Bourne Endeavor wrote...
osbornep wrote...
In some ways, I think the writers were backed into a corner with the genophage. For one, I'm not exactly sure how it's supposed to work, since the mechanism seems to change from game to game. More importantly, though, I think the writers held back quite a bit on portraying the degree to which the Krogan just have a super-violent culture as compared to everyone else. We see some crazies, like the Clan Weyrloc guy, but they can always be rationalized as just individual nutjobs. This is a problem from the point of view of giving a balanced perspective on the genophage, since the whole motivation for it was supposed to be that the Krogan's intrinsic barbarism made diplomacy impossible.
At the same time, I can see why the writers might have been reluctant to make the Krogan seem as scary as they were supposed to be, since such a portrayal might have been seen to have affinities with the "scientific" racism of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, according to which members of certain ethnic groups were just more prone to violence, less intelligent, etc. than others. It's a tough bind from a writing point of view, and I don't know what the resolution to it is.
EDIT: Fixed paragraphs
The issue I found is how the Genophage devolved into a simple black and white scenario. Throughout Mass Effect's predecessors, you could take a predominantly neutral stance, in particular regarding ME2, whereas in ME3 any opinion not supporting a cure wholesale seemed to be subtlety hinted as wrong. Understandably, Wrex is bias on the subject, even if his opinion seems to have notably changed to hardline cure support.
I will say, Victis puts up the best argument both in favor and against the cure. Until that point we knew little of the brutality of the Krogan rebellion. He is in many ways similar to the player on the fence, thus giving pause to think. The Dalatras is useless, though I suspect her emotional response was intended. Her opinion works because of what Victis says.
Overall, I don't have too much to nitpick from the Genophage saga beyond the above. I support it, though because of Wrex, the Krogan deserve one chance. Eve only bolsters that, while Wreav can lead the Krogan to extinction.
Now what I do pick apart more is Rannoch because the Quarian are not only portrayed as hilariously racist to the now pure and innocent Geth. They are fundamentally incompetent and if it were not for the need for war assets and Tali, I would allow their idiocy to doom their species.
Not only do they start a war in the midst of a Galaxy wide genocide. They lacked the logistics to even win that war to begin with. Xen came up with a new scrambling device to give them an edge, and they never anticipated the Geth would find a counterattack of some sort?
Modifié par David7204, 18 décembre 2013 - 10:36 .
David7204 wrote...
No Julia, not all the quarian ships had weapons. Please refrain from making up ridiculous nonsense.
Secondly, it's established that the quarians have 3 liveships. Not 30.
You anaylsis is very poor.
Modifié par sH0tgUn jUliA, 18 décembre 2013 - 10:39 .
David7204 wrote...
First of all, that was Raan. Not Gerrel. You clearly don't have your facts straight at all.
Secondly, 'giving the turians pause' doesn't mean the quarians are equals. It merely means they're strong enough to be a threat.
Thirdly, the strength of a fleet, particularly a fleet of 50,000 ships, is going to be based on much more than dreadnoughts.
You obviously aren't very good at this at all, Julia. Why don't you leave this to people who know what they're doing?
Modifié par Seboist, 18 décembre 2013 - 10:58 .