Aller au contenu

Photo

The Arishok's Hypocrisy on the Elves and Isabela


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
61 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Vit246

Vit246
  • Members
  • 1 467 messages

Two people technically commit a crime against Kirkwall. Kirkwall demands extradition. Arishok says no, because f'ck you, you're not Qunari.

Isabela commits a crime against Qunari. Arishok demands extradition because f'ck you, Qunari deserve it and everybody, including bas, shall obey the demands of the Qun whether they like it or not.

EDIT: OK, hipocrisy may not have been the right word. But there was something about the Arishok that I struggled to find a word for.

 

EDIT: For the sake of argument and legality, the two elves killed an alleged rapist. Alright? None of the characters, Hawke, Aveline, or Arishok knew anything else.


Modifié par Vit246, 23 avril 2014 - 05:53 .


#2
teh DRUMPf!!

teh DRUMPf!!
  • Members
  • 9 142 messages
lol, yeah, I was just thinking about this the other day.

I agreed with the Arishok on the elves, too. At least, I didn't think what he was doing was "right," but asked what I would do in his shoes, I said I'd protect them as well. I wish I could have argued something to that effect in defense of Isabela ~~ I'm just defending one of my own. You forgave murder. I forgive theft.

And I can even claim to have "reformed" my companion to higher moral standards if she returns with the 'Tome.

#3
Ferretinabun

Ferretinabun
  • Members
  • 2 687 messages
You're quite right, but it's just an example of religious extremism trumping respect for the law.

The Elves put themselves under the protection of the Qun. Therefore they are 'one of us'. Isabela crossed the Qun. Therefore she is the enemy.

I'm more annoyed I can't actually get Isabela to pay for her theft. If she runs, she runs for good. If she's decent enough to return, then you can hand her over, but she'll escape later anyway. Either way, she off scott free.

#4
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages
What law is there to respect? It's pretty apparent that Kirkwall is, at multiple levels, a place where the law is something that is blind to the rich and powerful and only applies to the poor or weak. The entire goal of Act 1 is to gain enough influence to be free of it- Hawke and co. are participants in the naked corruption of the city.

I would argue that the OP's point of hypocrisy is misaimed because the Qunari never make any pretext or pretension that they consider the city (or any other nation) equivalent or equal to the Qun. They've never pretended to adopt any pretense of equivalence or reciprocity of extradition. From the start, they've kept a position that Qunari affairs are separate but absolute.
  • Aimi aime ceci

#5
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages
Duh-duh-duhble post!

Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 18 décembre 2013 - 05:44 .


#6
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages
G-g-gah! Tripple post!

Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 18 décembre 2013 - 05:42 .


#7
caradoc2000

caradoc2000
  • Members
  • 7 550 messages
Also, we don't really know what the elves did. Hawke kills more random Kirkwall people than the qunari ever do, without getting accused.

#8
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

caradoc2000 wrote...

Also, we don't really know what the elves did. Hawke kills more random Kirkwall people than the qunari ever do, without getting accused.


We do know what they did. They killed a guard that raped their sister, after reporting the rape to the guardsmen didn't do a damn bit of good. Aveline didn't even really investigate her own guardsmen, nor consider it until she was put on the spot.
  • ShadowLordXII aime ceci

#9
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

Vit246 wrote...

Two people technically commit a crime against Kirkwall. Kirkwall demands extradition. Arishok says no, because f'ck you, you're not Qunari.

Isabela commits a crime against Qunari. Arishok demands extradition because f'ck you, Qunari deserve it and everybody, including bas, shall obey the demands of the Qun whether they like it or not.


See, thing is, they didn't just flee to another nation, they were claiming religious sanctuary. That sort of changes things up, doesn't it?

#10
caradoc2000

caradoc2000
  • Members
  • 7 550 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

caradoc2000 wrote...

Also, we don't really know what the elves did.


We do know what they did.

All right, I'll rephrase: You might know, I don't. In DAO it might look like you killed Leliana, but it turns out you didn't kill her after all. In Legacy it might seem you killed Corypheus, but I fear that isn't so after all. In DA2 it might seem the elves killed someone, but 'tis just a scratch.

Modifié par caradoc2000, 19 décembre 2013 - 10:12 .


#11
Sifr

Sifr
  • Members
  • 6 788 messages
While I defended Isabela, the Arishok really does have the moral high ground here.

The Elves committed a crime, seeking revenge against a rapist who had violated their sister, when the authorities in Kirkwall refused to act. They are now members of the Qunari and will be punished (or not punished), according to the Qun.

Keep in mind, should they try to leave the Qun afterwards, they will be slain on sight as Tal-Vashoth, so it's not like they're getting off scott free here. The Arishok expects them to live by the Qun or die by it.

Isabela has likewise committed a crime, having stolen the Tome of Koslun and is therefore responsible for every single death, be it human or Qunari in the years since. As a pirate, criminal and presumably not a full citizen of Kirkwall, she has absolutely no protection under the law of the land, so the Arishok is within his rights to ask for extradition into his custody.

If the Viscount had been asked to grant extradition and wasn't in the middle of his breakdown, he'd have likely handed her over in a second to appease the Arishok. The only person really getting angry over the Elf situation seems to be Aveline.
  • ShadowLordXII et Cobra's_back aiment ceci

#12
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Vit246 wrote...

Two people technically commit a crime against Kirkwall. Kirkwall demands extradition. Arishok says no, because f'ck you, you're not Qunari.

Isabela commits a crime against Qunari. Arishok demands extradition because f'ck you, Qunari deserve it and everybody, including bas, shall obey the demands of the Qun whether they like it or not.

The difference is that the Elves he protected had commited retribution on a Guardsmen who was being protected by corrupt officials. Isabela could claim no such thing.

#13
Lazy Jer

Lazy Jer
  • Members
  • 656 messages
I'm going to preface this entry by saying that I am NO fan of the Qun or the Qunari. However, if one looks at the Arishok's POV it isn't so much hypocritical as it is stubborn and a bit arrogant and short-sighted.

The Arishok denies Aveline's request to turn over the elves because they've accepted to Qun and are thus the responsibility of the Qunari. Seemingly, their previous crimes are washed away upon accepting the Qun. Thus, to the Arishok's mind, he's obeying the demands of the Qun.

When it comes to Isabella, he demands that she be turned over to the Qunari for her crime of stealing the Tome. This, too, is a demand of the Qun. Circumstances (i.e. the fact that she wasn't the original thief and that she returned it even at the risk of her own life) doesn't matter. He is simply doing as the Qun demands. He even risks his own life in a duel with Hawke when he refuses to hand her over (...and my Hawke does.)

In neither case does he make a case for the morality of either situation. In regards to the elves he simply says that they're Qunari and therefor no longer subject to Kirkwall's laws. He expresses neither sympathy for the elves nor does he endorse their actions. In Isabella's case the Arishok doesn't make any argument for "the thief" coming with them, he doesn't denounce her actions in any sort of personal way, he simply says that it's Qunari law.

Thus the Arishok's doesn't make any moral justification for his actions. He simply is following the Qun, or at least his interpretation of it. Therefor it may not be technically hypocritical. It is arrogant in that he refuses to allow for the laws of other lands or the ethics of the situation. To assume that the Qun is an excuse to steamroll over everyone else's beliefs and ethics, is to my mind, arrogant. Just as it was arrogant to assume that the Chantry had the rite to invade the Dales because they wouldn't allow missionaries from the Chantry (...and before we get sidetracked, yes I know that was a BS justification to invade and the Orlais/Dales war had a lot of root causes). It's also stubborn because the Arishok could have saved his own life and prevented further bloodshed in simply letting Isabella go. He had the Tome, that's what was keeping him from going home. Isabella wasn't necessarily part of his quest. The Arishok could simply say that he was unable to capture the thief. Plus, if he'd bothered to listen, the Arishok could have realized that Isabella wasn't even the first person to steal that book. She stole it from a bunch of Orlesians. But the Arikshok wouldn't put his own life, or the life of his soldiers above his rigid interpretation of what the demands of the Qun were.

So in closing, you can make a logical case for the Arishok not, in a technical sense, being hypocritical. But he was stubborn and a little arrogant.
  • sylvanaerie aime ceci

#14
Rebel Wolf

Rebel Wolf
  • Members
  • 238 messages
Isabela stole a book the elves killed a rapist.
Big diffrence.

Modifié par Rebel Wolf, 31 décembre 2013 - 02:11 .


#15
Rotward

Rotward
  • Members
  • 1 372 messages

Vit246 wrote...

Two people technically commit a crime against Kirkwall. Kirkwall demands extradition. Arishok says no, because f'ck you, you're not Qunari.

Isabela commits a crime against Qunari. Arishok demands extradition because f'ck you, Qunari deserve it and everybody, including bas, shall obey the demands of the Qun whether they like it or not.

Yea, he really bothered me. One person stole a book from us, better seig the city, and demand that they follow OUR rules. 

They should have been executed the second they tried to land. 
  • Snow_Rabbit aime ceci

#16
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

He expresses neither sympathy for the elves nor does he endorse their actions


IIRC he did. I know he asks Hawke what he would've done if he were in the same situation, and if Hawke says he would've done the same thing Aveline goes "What the hell, hero?" and I believe the Arishok just gives an "Exactly so."

That or it shifts into his "Their actions are mere symptoms, your society is the disease" line.
  • DeathScepter aime ceci

#17
Jedi Master of Orion

Jedi Master of Orion
  • Members
  • 6 912 messages
The Arishok doesn't care about laws. Especially the laws of bas nations. He only cares about what's right. He makes that clear from start to finish.

"And what would the Qunari be without principle? You I suspect.'

Modifié par Jedi Master of Orion, 01 janvier 2014 - 07:51 .


#18
Yendor_Trawz

Yendor_Trawz
  • Members
  • 247 messages
We only have the elves' word about what happened. Legally, it's hearsay. No guard has been questioned. The TONE of the story would have us believe it was true. But It hasn't been investigated. And Super Guard Captain Aveline hasn't gotten around to it yet.

But we know for sure that Isabela stole the book, she admits it.

#19
Yendor_Trawz

Yendor_Trawz
  • Members
  • 247 messages

Rebel Wolf wrote...

Isabela stole a book the elves killed a rapist.
Big diffrence.


The guard allegedly raped an elf.
The elves murdered a guard.

Also a big difference.

#20
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages

Jedi Master of Orion wrote...

The Arishok doesn't care about laws. Especially the laws of bas nations. He only cares about what's right. He makes that clear from start to finish.

"And what would the Qunari be without principle? You I suspect.'


I agree but if the first 2 sentences are amended to read
"The Arishok doesn't care about bas laws.  He only cares about what's right according to the Qun."

To him, the elves were Viddithari and no longer subject to the laws of Kirkwall.  If they performed pre-emptive justice it falls within the Qun just like the Qunari assassin who kills Petrice in most playthroughs does.  Isabela stole the most sacred object of their beliefs and the Qun demands she be brought to the same kind of swift retribution.  If Isabela remains with the party, Fenris later remarks that Isabela would not have been killed; she would have been reeducated or rendered a mindless slave.

I'm not saying it's right but I am saying that is what the Arishok believes.  In his mind he is not applying selective justice at all.

#21
calvinien

calvinien
  • Members
  • 135 messages
That is actually fairly true to life. People often holrd their religion as being above law and standards they set for others.

I watched a documentary about the WBC and they mentioned how they had picketred the funeral of a muslim woman. The guys in the churhc seriously dind't seem to know why her husband was mad at them and why the interviewer disaproved. They kept saying "He's the one getting mad at us for speaking the truth". They couldn't even comprehend that a pserson could come to a different idea of the truth than them.

Or look at muslims in europe. Talk about religious freedom yet massive riots when a guy draws a cartoon. Or christians in the US-**** their pants at the concept of sharia law but repeatedly try to get their own jesus branded version in. Because both see their religion as the indisputabel truth which automatically makes anythnig it does good.


It isn't necesarily hypocricy on the Arishok's part. Much like sten not being sure you are a woman, it could be that he literally cannot comprehend the minds of people who don't think like him. This is a guy who sat around for 4 years and never bothered to say to someone: we're looking for a book that was stolen form us by a busty pirate that tends to follow that hawke guy around. Why? Because the qun says he ins't allowed to.

So add him to the long list of people in DA2 who fall victim to the complete inabiility of the religious institutions of thedas to fix anything/

#22
Angarma

Angarma
  • Members
  • 295 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

What law is there to respect? It's
pretty apparent that Kirkwall is, at multiple levels, a place where the
law is something that is blind to the rich and powerful and only
applies to the poor or weak. The entire goal of Act 1 is to gain enough
influence to be free of it- Hawke and co. are participants in the naked
corruption of the city.

I would argue that the OP's point of
hypocrisy is misaimed because the Qunari never make any pretext or
pretension that they consider the city (or any other nation) equivalent
or equal to the Qun. They've never pretended to adopt any pretense of
equivalence or reciprocity of extradition. From the start, they've kept a
position that Qunari affairs are separate but absolute.


Sifr1449 wrote...

While I defended Isabela, the Arishok really does have the moral high ground here.

The
Elves committed a crime, seeking revenge against a rapist who had
violated their sister, when the authorities in Kirkwall refused to act.
They are now members of the Qunari and will be punished (or not
punished), according to the Qun.

Keep in mind, should they try to
leave the Qun afterwards, they will be slain on sight as Tal-Vashoth,
so it's not like they're getting off scott free here. The Arishok
expects them to live by the Qun or die by it.

Isabela has
likewise committed a crime, having stolen the Tome of Koslun and is
therefore responsible for every single death, be it human or Qunari in
the years since. As a pirate, criminal and presumably not a full citizen
of Kirkwall, she has absolutely no protection under the law of the
land, so the Arishok is within his rights to ask for extradition into
his custody.

If the Viscount had been asked to grant extradition
and wasn't in the middle of his breakdown, he'd have likely handed her
over in a second to appease the Arishok. The only person really getting
angry over the Elf situation seems to be Aveline.


Dean and Sifr fill in my opinion for me here. Some people in this thread, I believe,
are trying to apply their own logic to the orange morality that is found within the Qun.


The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

See, thing is, they
didn't just flee to another nation, they were claiming religious
sanctuary. That sort of changes things up, doesn't it?


calvinien wrote...

That is actually fairly true to life. People often holrd their religion as being above law and standards they set for others.


Ferretinabun wrote...

You're quite right, but it's just an example of religious extremism trumping respect for the law.

The Elves put themselves under the protection of the Qun. Therefore they are 'one of us'. Isabela crossed the Qun. Therefore she is the enemy.

I'm more annoyed I can't actually get Isabela to pay for her theft. If she runs, she runs for good. If she's decent enough to return, then you can hand her over, but she'll escape later anyway. Either way, she off scott free.


Religious? I don't believe that's the right word. Qunari do not believe in deities, they are just philosophical.

Lazy Jer wrote...

Thus the Arishok's doesn't make any
moral justification for his actions. He simply is following the Qun, or
at least his interpretation of it. Therefor it may not be technically
hypocritical. It is arrogant in that he refuses to allow for the laws
of other lands or the ethics of the situation. To assume that the Qun
is an excuse to steamroll over everyone else's beliefs and ethics, is to
my mind, arrogant.


The laws of humans are prone to corruption and applying human morality to a born qunari is in itself, arrogant.

Rotward wrote...

Yea, he really bothered me. One person stole a book from us, better seig the city, and demand that they follow OUR rules. 

They should have been executed the second they tried to land. 


That is short sighted. He besieged the city because of the lack of order being shown within it.
Coming from the background of the Qun, this is understandable, especially for morality's sake.
As well, this choice was not made lightly- it took the Arishok years to debate on the decision.

#23
Nefla

Nefla
  • Members
  • 7 695 messages
The Arishok was an incompetent leader, contradictory, lazy, unjust, etc...I don't see why so many people like him other than "he's big and looks cool!"

#24
Abraham_uk

Abraham_uk
  • Members
  • 11 713 messages
I was okay with everything he did up to the point where he sent in his army to take over Kirkwall.
Lots of people dead for no justifiable reason.

My respect for the Arishok went down from 100% to 0% at that point.


I don't know if what the opening poster said counts as hypocrisy though.
The Qun believe that their way of life is the best and they wish to enlighten others.
The book that was stolen was key to their faith.


However the mass murder part is the part that I find hard to swallow.

Modifié par Abraham_uk, 03 février 2014 - 09:21 .


#25
Sentinel358

Sentinel358
  • Members
  • 727 messages
He denied turning in two elves because 1.)they were willing to convert and 2.)they killed a rapist which isnt a crime in most peoples minds.

Isabela stole a sacred book that rightfully belongs to the Qunari, for almost no reason besides being greedy and is the sole reason he had to be in kirkwall to begin with, the guards were prepared to take the elves by force so the Arishok took the initiative. Her greed almost began a war