1814 réponses à ce sujet

[JamesFaith]

dreamgazer wrote...

I critique all three games, yet I enjoy all three games. They're all flawed.

For what it's worth, I dig into some of the movies I really like, too, where there's something to rag on.

Exactly.

Perfection isn't essential for enjoyment.  

[spirosz]

Ambient auto dialogue is fine, ME2 had the best balance of that.

[Steelcan]

You clearly aren't even worth the time to respond to.

You are either trolling or just deluded.

[David7204]

It's a shame I got banned for that post I made a few days ago (explaining why this forum is filled with people who seem to hate the game and BioWare), else I would copy it here.

Modifié par David7204, 04 janvier 2014 - 11:08 .

[txgoldrush]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

*yawn*

I didn't say I hated ME3, I said it had numerous faults, many of them quite odious. You do know the difference correct?

sounds like bashing to me....

Nevermind you claim faults continuously when there is evidence against your claims.

So any kind of criticism, even if it's constructive is 'bashing'.

Those kinds of people are the ones that need the most bashing.

And I believe to deny any kind of criticism is called droning.

And I do not drone, ME3 does have its flaws, but so does any Bioware game.

I just don't call out flaws when it isn't there.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

*yawn*

I didn't say I hated ME3, I said it had numerous faults, many of them quite odious. You do know the difference correct?

sounds like bashing to me....

Nevermind you claim faults continuously when there is evidence against your claims.

So any kind of criticism, even if it's constructive is 'bashing'.

Those kinds of people are the ones that need the most bashing.

And I believe to deny any kind of criticism is called droning.

And I do not drone, ME3 does have its flaws, but so does any Bioware game.

I just don't call out flaws when it isn't there.

Well it seems that many people here disagree with you. Does that make them inherently wrong?

Someone didn't like something you did. How dare they have their own opinion.

[dreamgazer]

David7204 wrote...

It's a shame I got banned for that post I made a few days ago (explaining why this forum is filled with people who seem to hate the game and BioWare), else I would copy it here.

You could always try and word it in a way that won't get you banned.

Just a thought.

[txgoldrush]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

*yawn*

I didn't say I hated ME3, I said it had numerous faults, many of them quite odious. You do know the difference correct?

sounds like bashing to me....

Nevermind you claim faults continuously when there is evidence against your claims.

So any kind of criticism, even if it's constructive is 'bashing'.

Those kinds of people are the ones that need the most bashing.

And I believe to deny any kind of criticism is called droning.

And I do not drone, ME3 does have its flaws, but so does any Bioware game.

I just don't call out flaws when it isn't there.

Well it seems that many people here disagree with you. Does that make them inherently wrong?

Someone didn't like something you did. How dare they have their own opinion.

How about not ignoring clear facts that contradict you. Not claiming plot holes or deus ex machina when there isn't any. Not claiming that the game doesn't address something when it does and you miss it.

[spirosz]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

*yawn*

I didn't say I hated ME3, I said it had numerous faults, many of them quite odious. You do know the difference correct?

sounds like bashing to me....

Nevermind you claim faults continuously when there is evidence against your claims.

So any kind of criticism, even if it's constructive is 'bashing'.

Those kinds of people are the ones that need the most bashing.

And I believe to deny any kind of criticism is called droning.

And I do not drone, ME3 does have its flaws, but so does any Bioware game.

I just don't call out flaws when it isn't there.

Well it seems that many people here disagree with you. Does that make them inherently wrong?

Someone didn't like something you did. How dare they have their own opinion.

That is basically what all this argument is about, lolol. 

[spirosz]

txgoldrush wrote...

How about not ignoring clear facts that contradict you. Not claiming plot holes or deus ex machina when there isn't any. Not claiming that the game doesn't address something when it does and you miss it.

The exact opposite can be said and used against you in similar fashion.  

[AresKeith]

txgoldrush wrote...

How is Cerberus a fault? They are supposed to represent the dark side of humanity and how this darkness can undermine humanity. They have a clear role in the story and the themes of the series.

This right here is looking to far into things

[CynicalShep]

txgoldrush wrote...

How is Cerberus a fault? They are supposed to represent the dark side of humanity and how this darkness can undermine humanity. They have a clear role in the story and the themes of the series.

That's silly. I thought they were there to show that the "good guys" don't always have to be a shining beacon of morality. I thought the Alliance was the dark side of humanity, ignoring Shepard's plea and letting all those colonists get kidnapped like that. We must've played different games.

txgoldrush wrote...

Autodialogue isn't a fault, its your preference. You just don't like it. I actually do, and the Citadel DLC is a winning example on why autodialogue works.

lel

txgoldrush wrote...

And once again, most ME2 characters simply are not important to the grand plot, hence this is why they have smaller roles. Just because you like a character a lot doesn't mean they should be given equal time.

They're not important because that's what devs decided to spend resources on. There is no one who is more important/fits better in the Cerberus plot than Miranda. For comparison: the codex encyclopedia from ME1 (Tali) is somehow important to the grand plot. Apart from the Geth-Quarian conflict (which isn't "the grand plot") Tali is absolutely irrelevant. 

[txgoldrush]

spirosz wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

*yawn*

I didn't say I hated ME3, I said it had numerous faults, many of them quite odious. You do know the difference correct?

sounds like bashing to me....

Nevermind you claim faults continuously when there is evidence against your claims.

So any kind of criticism, even if it's constructive is 'bashing'.

Those kinds of people are the ones that need the most bashing.

And I believe to deny any kind of criticism is called droning.

And I do not drone, ME3 does have its flaws, but so does any Bioware game.

I just don't call out flaws when it isn't there.

Well it seems that many people here disagree with you. Does that make them inherently wrong?

Someone didn't like something you did. How dare they have their own opinion.

That is basically what all this argument is about, lolol. 

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.

[spirosz]

And same to you, homie.

[AresKeith]

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.

This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left

[txgoldrush]

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.

This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left

or you just do not like what I have to say....but its the truth.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

txgoldrush wrote...
How about not ignoring clear facts that contradict you. Not claiming plot holes or deus ex machina when there isn't any. Not claiming that the game doesn't address something when it does and you miss it.

I don't think I ever did this.

You did though. 

That said, I'm just the guy throwing the peanut at the clam. It always puts on a lovely show.

[von uber]

Blimey, that escalated quickly.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

txgoldrush wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.

This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left

or you just do not like what I have to say....but its the truth.

Your truth maybe. Not the truth. Lala-land is great this time of year though.

[spirosz]

[txgoldrush]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.

This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left

or you just do not like what I have to say....but its the truth.

Your truth maybe. Not the truth. Lala-land is great this time of year though.

Boy you know little about the real world.

Its the truth, people do not respect opinions based off of lies and ignorance, unless they are ignorant themselves.

[CynicalShep]

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.

This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left

>txgoldrush
>credibility

Pick one ^

[dreamgazer]

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.

I hope you don't actually wonder why people tend to clash with your point of view. 

[AresKeith]

txgoldrush wrote...

Boy you know little about the real world.

Its the truth, people do not respect opinions based off of lies and ignorance, unless they are ignorant themselves.

Which still goes back to you

Since all I've seen from you is say the following:

"You don't get" "Wow your ignorant" "Your wrong"

Then go off and talk about themes but never back up your posts other than saying well it's in game