Aller au contenu

Photo

I'm frustrated that ME3 didn't learn its lesson IMO


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
1814 réponses à ce sujet

#1401
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

CynicalShep wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.


This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left


>txgoldrush
>credibility

Pick one ^


and many bashers here on this board is credible? Wow

#1402
spirosz

spirosz
  • Members
  • 16 356 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.


This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left


or you just do not like what I have to say....but its the truth.


Your truth maybe. Not the truth. Lala-land is great this time of year though.


Boy you know little about the real world.

Its the truth, people do not respect opinions based off of lies and ignorance, unless they are ignorant themselves.


You realize you're contradicting youself right?  

#1403
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

CynicalShep wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.


This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left


>txgoldrush
>credibility

Pick one ^


and many bashers here on this board is credible? Wow


No, but dismissing them all because you don't agree with them doesn't make you credible.

#1404
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

Lathrim wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.


This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left


or you just do not like what I have to say....but its the truth.


Your truth maybe. Not the truth. Lala-land is great this time of year though.


Boy you know little about the real world.

Its the truth, people do not respect opinions based off of lies and ignorance, unless they are ignorant themselves.


You're correct. People don't. But they should. 


so I should respect a racist opinion based off of ignorant falsehoods about another race?

No I shouldn't.

Modifié par txgoldrush, 04 janvier 2014 - 11:24 .


#1405
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 292 messages
"I am going to state a subjective opinion and criticize everyone who disagrees as being ignorant fools, for only I know the truth"

#1406
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages
Nice strawman there, txgoldrush

Modifié par AresKeith, 04 janvier 2014 - 11:26 .


#1407
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

CynicalShep wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.


This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left


>txgoldrush
>credibility

Pick one ^


and many bashers here on this board is credible? Wow


No, but dismissing them all because you don't agree with them doesn't make you credible.


No, I am dismissing them because they are basing their opinions off of falsehoods, not because I disagree with them.

#1408
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

Boy you know little about the real world.

Its the truth, people do not respect opinions based off of lies and ignorance, unless they are ignorant themselves.


Seems like a pretty self-fulfilling statement here for you. Thumbs up chum! You've summed yourself up!

#1409
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Boy you know little about the real world.

Its the truth, people do not respect opinions based off of lies and ignorance, unless they are ignorant themselves.


Seems like a pretty self-fulfilling statement here for you. Thumbs up chum! You've summed yourself up!


and you are so above it...whatever.

#1410
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

No, I am dismissing them because they are basing their opinions off of falsehoods, not because I disagree with them.


Lets put it this way, is there any possibility of changing your mind?

#1411
spirosz

spirosz
  • Members
  • 16 356 messages

Steelcan wrote...

"I am going to state a subjective opinion and criticize everyone who disagrees as being ignorant fools, for only I know the truth"


In a nutshell. 

#1412
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

CynicalShep wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.


This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left


>txgoldrush
>credibility

Pick one ^


and many bashers here on this board is credible? Wow


You're pretty easy to impress. Too bad most people "don't get you". BSN is more fun with you around. You are the living emodiment of irony. 

#1413
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Boy you know little about the real world.

Its the truth, people do not respect opinions based off of lies and ignorance, unless they are ignorant themselves.


Seems like a pretty self-fulfilling statement here for you. Thumbs up chum! You've summed yourself up!


and you are so above it...whatever.


I'm not saying anything about myself or my opinions.

I'm only saying things about you.

#1414
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

CynicalShep wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

CynicalShep wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.


This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left


>txgoldrush
>credibility

Pick one ^


and many bashers here on this board is credible? Wow


You're pretty easy to impress. Too bad most people "don't get you". BSN is more fun with you around. You are the living emodiment of irony. 


or you the embodiment of ignorance.

#1415
spirosz

spirosz
  • Members
  • 16 356 messages
And back to what I asked originally, 

spirosz wrote...

Also TX back to the "core" crew. If they all die before ME3? Is this then not considered "canon"?



#1416
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

No, I am dismissing them because they are basing their opinions off of falsehoods, not because I disagree with them.


Lets put it this way, is there any possibility of changing your mind?


Yes...when I learn something and realize I am basing my opinion off of a falsehood or something I missed.

Like the Sopranos ending....hated at first, but then saw the foreshadowing. Now its brilliant.

#1417
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 759 messages

spirosz wrote...

And back to what I asked originally, 

spirosz wrote...

Also TX back to the "core" crew. If they all die before ME3? Is this then not considered "canon"?


Well, two of the "core" crew aren't able to be killed before ME3: VS and Liara. 

#1418
von uber

von uber
  • Members
  • 5 525 messages

spirosz wrote...

And back to what I asked originally, 

spirosz wrote...

Also TX back to the "core" crew. If they all die before ME3? Is this then not considered "canon"?


Player canon? Yes, of course.

#1419
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

CynicalShep wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

CynicalShep wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

Just because you have opinion doesn't mean that I have to respect it, especially if you back you opinion up with falsehoods and ignorance.


This is just a plain BS statement that makes you lose any credibility you had left


>txgoldrush
>credibility

Pick one ^


and many bashers here on this board is credible? Wow


You're pretty easy to impress. Too bad most people "don't get you". BSN is more fun with you around. You are the living emodiment of irony. 


or you the embodiment of ignorance.


And what am I ignoring? Must've missed it through the sheer power of my incredible ignorance

#1420
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

spirosz wrote...

And back to what I asked originally, 

spirosz wrote...

Also TX back to the "core" crew. If they all die before ME3? Is this then not considered "canon"?


Before ME3: Does Liara and EDI die? Joker? Anderson before ME3?

Nevermind Tali and Garrus dying has repercussions on the Rannoch arc for the former, and losing athematic core for the latter.

And just because Tali and Garrus can die in ME2 doesn't mean they aren't more important than the rest of the ME2 squad. Hell both Mordin and Grunt can die, but that doesn't mean that Mordin isn't a far more important character in the series than Grunt.

#1421
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

No, I am dismissing them because they are basing their opinions off of falsehoods, not because I disagree with them.


Lets put it this way, is there any possibility of changing your mind?


Yes...when I learn something and realize I am basing my opinion off of a falsehood or something I missed.

Like the Sopranos ending....hated at first, but then saw the foreshadowing. Now its brilliant.


I'm a practical man. A man of science. And a person who would say the same.

Can you recognize a falsehood whenever you see it? How do you determine the falsehood from the truth?

#1422
txgoldrush

txgoldrush
  • Members
  • 4 249 messages

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

txgoldrush wrote...

No, I am dismissing them because they are basing their opinions off of falsehoods, not because I disagree with them.


Lets put it this way, is there any possibility of changing your mind?


Yes...when I learn something and realize I am basing my opinion off of a falsehood or something I missed.

Like the Sopranos ending....hated at first, but then saw the foreshadowing. Now its brilliant.


I'm a practical man. A man of science. And a person who would say the same.

Can you recognize a falsehood whenever you see it? How do you determine the falsehood from the truth?


evidence, cold hard proven facts.

#1423
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

txgoldrush wrote...

spirosz wrote...

And back to what I asked originally, 

spirosz wrote...

Also TX back to the "core" crew. If they all die before ME3? Is this then not considered "canon"?


Before ME3: Does Liara and EDI die? Joker? Anderson before ME3?

Nevermind Tali and Garrus dying has repercussions on the Rannoch arc for the former, and losing athematic core for the latter.

And just because Tali and Garrus can die in ME2 doesn't mean they aren't more important than the rest of the ME2 squad. Hell both Mordin and Grunt can die, but that doesn't mean that Mordin isn't a far more important character in the series than Grunt.


You do realize that Mordin plays an important part in the Tuchanka arc which makes him more important than Garrus

#1424
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
A man of science, huh?

#1425
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 292 messages
You speak of evidence and hard facts, yet you use themes as a defense. Themes of a work are open to interpretation.