Aller au contenu

Photo

What Kind of Person Will You Be?? - on your first playthrough


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
209 réponses à ce sujet

#76
SgtSteel91

SgtSteel91
  • Members
  • 1 898 messages

David7204 wrote...

I'm curious why your Inquisitor would even bother with principles at all. Why not throw them in the garbage immediately if they're discarded so very, very easily? 


Maybe he/she meant "traditional" principles like self-sacrifice for others and stuff like traditional, Superman-like, heroes do.

I know my Inquisitor will do whatever it takes to close the veil tear, bring the ones resoponsible to justice, and protect the people of Thedas, mages and common people alike.

Modifié par SgtSteel91, 20 décembre 2013 - 10:13 .


#77
Secretlyapotato

Secretlyapotato
  • Members
  • 815 messages
For now a male qunari mage who's mean and selfish and greedy and harsh but not totally evil and still willing to do good deeds, kinda like my Shepard and different from my Hawke and Warden who are both sarcastic and laidback.

Oh and he's also a huge **** like all my protagonists. And he shall romance a tiny elf woman. :3

#78
MajorKellyRisner

MajorKellyRisner
  • Members
  • 439 messages
A female Qunari Mage who is noble and honorable

#79
okiness

okiness
  • Members
  • 376 messages

Secretlyapotato wrote...

For now a male qunari mage who's mean and selfish and greedy and harsh but not totally evil and still willing to do good deeds, kinda like my Shepard and different from my Hawke and Warden who are both sarcastic and laidback.

Oh and he's also a huge **** like all my protagonists. And he shall romance a tiny elf woman. :3


That's hot.

Sounds like my boyfriend. He kind of on purpose likes to do the worst imaginable. I just play to my character, he's like "i hate this puppy. WHOEVER LETS ME KILL IT LIVES"

#80
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
I don't think so. And in any case, the question still stands. If such things have no value, why not throw them in the garbage immediately?

#81
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

David7204 wrote...

I don't think so. And in any case, the question still stands. If such things have no value, why not throw them in the garbage immediately?


All of our actions are guided by our principles.

#82
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
Apparently not.

#83
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

David7204 wrote...

Apparently not.


Choosing to choose the most rational and logical approach at all times seems like a principal to me.

#84
SgtSteel91

SgtSteel91
  • Members
  • 1 898 messages
Maybe it's like "the ends justifies the mean" kind of thing? I don't think what Ieldra2 posted were principles but goals worth pursuing and a promise to eliminate those who get in the way of those goals.

Modifié par SgtSteel91, 20 décembre 2013 - 10:20 .


#85
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Apparently not.


Choosing to choose the most rational and logical approach at all times seems like a principal to me.

Then why on a Earth would someone pretend to have a second set of principles simply to throw away and make way for the 'real' principles any time a slightly difficult situation rears its head? That seems to be quite pointless and ridiculous.

#86
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

David7204 wrote...

The Mad Hanar wrote...

David7204 wrote...

Apparently not.


Choosing to choose the most rational and logical approach at all times seems like a principal to me.

Then why on a Earth would someone pretend to have a second set of principles simply to throw away and make way for the 'real' principles any time a slightly difficult situation rears its head? That seems to be quite pointless and ridiculous.


Maybe he was referring to the principals that are generally more accepted. *shrugs*

#87
SgtSteel91

SgtSteel91
  • Members
  • 1 898 messages
I think the point Ieldra2 was trying to say was that their Inquisitor would be pragmatic. He/she wouldn't care about what others considered 'evil' or 'wrong' as long as it helped them pursue their goal.

#88
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests

SgtSteel91 wrote...

I think the point Ieldra2 was trying to say was that their Inquisitor would be pragmatic. He/she wouldn't care about what others considered 'evil' or 'wrong' as long as it helped them pursue their goal.


Yeah, that seems to be what he was saying. I misunderstood the conversation at first.

#89
SgtSteel91

SgtSteel91
  • Members
  • 1 898 messages
I know my Inquisitor will be pragmatic. He'll, for example, allow the use of Blood Magic and make deals with demons if he know's he stab the demon in the back and still get what he bargained for. But he's not going to sacrifice the people of Thedas, who he's sworn as leader of the Inquisition to protect (well not unless he has no choice or he really does not like the alternatives).

Modifié par SgtSteel91, 20 décembre 2013 - 10:36 .


#90
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
So will mine. But that idea that being 'pragmatic' somehow comes at the cost of principles has no merit. In fact, the exact opposite is true. Principles are necessary for pragmatism.

#91
TormDK

TormDK
  • Members
  • 1 152 messages
My first DA:O went with the self sacrifice, I plan on doing the same for DA:I

So "Good" all the way.

#92
KC_Prototype

KC_Prototype
  • Members
  • 4 603 messages
Like all my other first play throughs, A good hearted, noble, brave, bad ass human, male warrior. I probably will tell my soldiers to go to the keep while I and my 3 companions save Crestwood.

#93
RobRam10

RobRam10
  • Members
  • 3 266 messages
Powerhungry mage inquisitor.

#94
bEVEsthda

bEVEsthda
  • Members
  • 3 603 messages
I'll do some variation on  my usual foundation: Which is unwilling.
It'll be interesting to see how the game provides possibilities for that.

Why unwilling, I haven't decided yet. Maybe a coward, maybe someone who just doesn't care anymore. Maybe someone who were on the way to something different., other ambition.

#95
Jorji Costava

Jorji Costava
  • Members
  • 2 584 messages

David7204 wrote...

Then why on a Earth would someone pretend to have a second set of principles simply to throw away and make way for the 'real' principles any time a slightly difficult situation rears its head? That seems to be quite pointless and ridiculous.


Actually, John Stuart Mill proposes a system very much like this in Utilitarianism. Under most circumstances, you follow a system of secondary principles (which consist of generalities like "Keep promises," "Do not harm others," etc.); only when these secondary principles are in conflict do you apply the over-arching Principle of Utility directly. The reason why you didn't just apply that principle to every situation, according to Mill, was that utilitarian calculation was time-consuming, and people are generally very bad at it. Thus, the general good would actually be promoted more if people relied on secondary principles most of the time. Henry Sidgwick took this line of thinking even further, suggesting that even though he himself took utilitarianism to be true, it would probably be best if most folk weren't utilitarians.

#96
David7204

David7204
  • Members
  • 15 187 messages
Huh. That's very interesting. And I mean that sincerely. Still, it's not the same thing as what I'm seeing here.

#97
Sylvius the Mad

Sylvius the Mad
  • Members
  • 24 111 messages
The same character I always play first. Which, according to BSN's analysis, suffers from anti-social personality disorder.

#98
Rebel Wolf

Rebel Wolf
  • Members
  • 238 messages
Chaotic neutral always.

#99
Karlone123

Karlone123
  • Members
  • 2 029 messages

Sylvius the Mad wrote...

The same character I always play first. Which, according to BSN's analysis, suffers from anti-social personality disorder.


If everyone acted as they did on BSN in real life, then people like David would have been exiled a long time ago.

Modifié par Karlone123, 21 décembre 2013 - 12:02 .


#100
PMC65

PMC65
  • Members
  • 3 279 messages

LolaLei wrote...

During my first ever playthrough of any BioWare game I always play as myself and make decisions/choices I would pick if I was in that situation (just to see how badly I'd balls things up). Sooooo, I'm not entire sure if my character would be considered good or bad really.


This is how my first run goes as well ... I name him "Stupid" and then run around blindly, hoping for the best. Then the next run (if the game is that enjoyable) I create a female and give her a proper name.