What do you think they're burning in those ovens eh? EH?!
She needed to go.
You got what you deserved Technophile filth.
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 19 décembre 2013 - 08:05 .
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 19 décembre 2013 - 08:05 .
Plaintiff wrote...
Of course. No Templar is ever responsible for their own choices. The mages always made them do it.AresKeith wrote...
Lord Raijin wrote...
Veruin wrote...
Lord Raijin wrote...
Not without permission from the Grand Cleric
I think the knight commander still has to be the one to invoke the right in the first place.
Only after the Grand Cleric approves of it.... unless if the Grand Cleric has been assasinated then the Knight-Commander has the right to invoke the R.o.A.
So Anders is to blame from what happened in Kirkwall
It's the George Zimmerman school of self-defense.
Plaintiff wrote...
Of course. No Templar is ever responsible for their own choices. The mages always made them do it.
It's the George Zimmerman school of self-defense.
Modifié par AresKeith, 19 décembre 2013 - 08:06 .
Medhia Nox wrote...
@Grand Admiral Cheesecake: Grand Baker Eloise was directly opposing my Moderate Neo-Luddite movement with her approval of four... FOUR industrial quality ovens.
What do you think they're burning in those ovens eh? EH?!
She needed to go.
You got what you deserved Technophile filth.
It is called a right becase the Chantry simply retains the right to purge any Circle they deem beyond saving. If it was a rite, it would have to be considered a sacred action, which it obviously isn't (since it isn't called a rite).Darth Brotarian wrote...
Why is it right and not rite?
Plaintiff wrote...
Of course. No Templar is ever responsible for their own choices. The mages always made them do it.
It's the George Zimmerman school of self-defense.
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 19 décembre 2013 - 08:09 .
eluvianix wrote...
Lord Raijin wrote...
Only after the Grand Cleric approves of it.... unless if the Grand Cleric has been assasinated then the Knight-Commander has the right to invoke the R.o.A.
But even then, they can't carry it out until they get an OK from another Grand Cleric or the Divine.
Ravensword wrote...
Lord Raijin wrote...
Ravensword wrote...
So, how about those demons in the Fade?
They deserve their freedom too.
Lol. You're funny. I like you.
I'm just going off what the Wiki says. Perhaps it was legal due to the extremity of this situation.Lord Raijin wrote...
David Gaider indicated on another thread that after the Chantry was blown up Meredith invoking the R.o.A was perfectly legal.
eluvianix wrote...
Yes. That is not in question. Meredith's reaction though is what is being called into question. She had no legal right to carry out the Rite.AresKeith wrote...
So Anders is to blame from what happened in Kirkwall
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Ravensword wrote...
Can we please stop talking about that vigilante, wannabe cop that shot an unarmed kid?
Modifié par Medhia Nox, 19 décembre 2013 - 08:16 .
Medhia Nox wrote...
@Plaintiff: Be fair though - both sides say that ALL the time.
I've seen Pro-Mages not only condone, but promote, all manner of disgusting actions in the name of vengeance disguised as justice.
And Pro-Templars that think locking up a bunch of people instead of actually given them a chance to prove they're as safe as they claim is a solution not worth changing.
The wiki says that it's okay when the Grand Cleric is dead.eluvianix wrote...
I'm just going off what the Wiki says. Perhaps it was legal due to the extremity of this situation.Lord Raijin wrote...
David Gaider indicated on another thread that after the Chantry was blown up Meredith invoking the R.o.A was perfectly legal.
"And so Plaintiff looked at the other players around the table and smirked. "Heh, thy will never see this comming" he thought to himself narrowing his eyes on one particular card on his hand.Plaintiff wrote...
Of course. No Templar is ever responsible for their own choices. The mages always made them do it.AresKeith wrote...
Lord Raijin wrote...
Veruin wrote...
Lord Raijin wrote...
Not without permission from the Grand Cleric
I think the knight commander still has to be the one to invoke the right in the first place.
Only after the Grand Cleric approves of it.... unless if the Grand Cleric has been assasinated then the Knight-Commander has the right to invoke the R.o.A.
So Anders is to blame from what happened in Kirkwall
It's the George Zimmerman school of self-defense.
Modifié par EmperorSahlertz, 19 décembre 2013 - 08:24 .
alliance commander wrote...
Some Of you have done a good job of going off topic.
Modifié par wolfhowwl, 19 décembre 2013 - 08:30 .
Dave of Canada wrote...
Wow, that's a lot of evidence. Thank god you provided all of that in court.
Guns are tools for murder, if you have one on your person you have no business claiming self-defense in any circumstance.wolfhowwl wrote...
"If you have a gun, and you shoot someone who does not, that is not self-defense by any stretch of the imagination."
Yes it still can be self-defense. Ridiculous.
Veruin wrote...
This will go well.