I'm glad this conversation is over.megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Weapon balance doesn't matter because this isn't a PvP game?
It matters but to a lesser degree
Next Effect: Should we be still be forced to wield guns?
#51
Posté 20 décembre 2013 - 11:35
#52
Posté 20 décembre 2013 - 11:39
megabeast37215 wrote...
Tupexi wrote...
megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Gameplay should always be the priority of game design. If a feature exist for no other reason than to be cool, it doesn't need to be there.Cyonan wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Dual wielding is objectivly stupid. You expend twice as much ammo at three times worse accruacy.
But you get twice as many style points.
and in the end, isn't that what really matters?
You can be cool and efficient at the same time. Also... It makes sense to use a primary weapon and dual wield, let's say.. Eagles.
It never makes SENSE to dual wield, but as it's said: gameplay should be priority.
It damn sure made sense to dual wield G-13s and Raficas in CoD... As primary weapons no less. Dual wielding isn't about accuracy, it's about extreme mobility while hipfiring and spraying. Good luck hitting a halo jumping, dropshotting dual wield SMG user with your 3 round burst or semi auto accuracy weapon in close quarters... I saying dual wielding isn't viable is the same as saying shotguns aren't viable. They fill the same niche.
You are correct of course. I meant "make sense" in real world scenario sort of way. Hence the gameplay first comment.
#53
Posté 20 décembre 2013 - 11:39
Tokenusername wrote...
I'm glad this conversation is over.megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Weapon balance doesn't matter because this isn't a PvP game?
It matters but to a lesser degree
I bet you are... It sucks to be wrong.
#54
Posté 20 décembre 2013 - 11:48
Go watch your movie so I don't have to listen to your terrible opinions.megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
I'm glad this conversation is over.megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Weapon balance doesn't matter because this isn't a PvP game?
It matters but to a lesser degree
I bet you are... It sucks to be wrong.
#55
Posté 20 décembre 2013 - 11:51
But that isn't fair.Tokenusername wrote...
If your entire team puts their stock in the same strategy, then you guys made a bad call. Variety should be in part be vital to success.
You can't introduce a new feature, and then punish people for using it.
And do you really expect strangers to work co-operatively together? Especially after seeing what pugs do in this game already.
#56
Posté 20 décembre 2013 - 11:57
Seems odd to be playing a game designed around cooperation with no intent to cooperate.Tech Domain wrote...
do you really expect strangers to work co-operatively together?
#57
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 12:01
ikr.Tokenusername wrote...
Seems odd to be playing a game designed around cooperation with no intent to cooperate.
It's like buying a ham sandwich, with no intention of eating it.
Modifié par Tech Domain, 21 décembre 2013 - 12:02 .
#58
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 12:06
What?Tupexi wrote...
megabeast37215 wrote...
Tupexi wrote...
megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Gameplay should always be the priority of game design. If a feature exist for no other reason than to be cool, it doesn't need to be there.Cyonan wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Dual wielding is objectivly stupid. You expend twice as much ammo at three times worse accruacy.
But you get twice as many style points.
and in the end, isn't that what really matters?
You can be cool and efficient at the same time. Also... It makes sense to use a primary weapon and dual wield, let's say.. Eagles.
It never makes SENSE to dual wield, but as it's said: gameplay should be priority.
It damn sure made sense to dual wield G-13s and Raficas in CoD... As primary weapons no less. Dual wielding isn't about accuracy, it's about extreme mobility while hipfiring and spraying. Good luck hitting a halo jumping, dropshotting dual wield SMG user with your 3 round burst or semi auto accuracy weapon in close quarters... I saying dual wielding isn't viable is the same as saying shotguns aren't viable. They fill the same niche.
You are correct of course. I meant "make sense" in real world scenario sort of way. Hence the gameplay first comment.
#59
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 12:23
#60
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 01:13
Personally I'd like to see more melee options, soldiers today are still trained in advanced hand to hand combat; enough of the galaxy's finest swinging their guns around like baseball bats, maybe some throws, human shield...I dunno..things.
#61
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 01:27
ALTBOULI wrote...
We should be allowed to dual wield! imagine the endless possibilities
my thoughts exactly.
#62
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:08
#63
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:12
Reizo Ryuu wrote...
I doubt Geth would have any issues dual wielding anything, they are walking aimbots, literally; having a n AR like power on a geth that enables dual wielding due some higher processing power space magic, should supply all the style and substance points so everyone can be happy.
Personally I'd like to see more melee options, soldiers today are still trained in advanced hand to hand combat; enough of the galaxy's finest swinging their guns around like baseball bats, maybe some throws, human shield...I dunno..things.
I'm always in favor of adding MORE space-karate to anything. I mean, just think about how awesome Fried Green Tomatos would have been with space-karate?
But at the same time, I don't think a judo flip is going to impress the average Abomination...
#64
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:13
VaultingFrog wrote...
I want to use a spoon as my weapon. Because its dull you twit! It'll hurt more!
The only reason he was in the Sherwood forest was to pull off the most daring robbery of all time.
#65
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:14
Strict31 wrote...
VaultingFrog wrote...
I want to use a spoon as my weapon. Because its dull you twit! It'll hurt more!
The only reason he was in the Sherwood forest was to pull off the most daring robbery of all time.
I was worried somebody might not get that reference. Thank you for making BSN awesome and remembering that quote.
#66
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:15
heroicmass wrote...
megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Dual wielding is objectivly stupid. You expend twice as much ammo at three times worse accruacy.megabeast37215 wrote...
TheThirdRace wrote...
I think we should be able to decide which type of weapons we bring into battle.
I wish there would be 3 types of weapons. Guns for those that want to shoot everything. Omni-tools for those that want to play only with powers (biotic or tech). Melee weapons for those that want to impale or decapitate everything.
There could be some cross-play between those, I would love to see Pull + Melee punch detonates a biotic explosion...
This... And dual wielding.
Doesn't matter at point blank range. Would be awesome on Vanguards... Dual wielding punishers.. ohh yeah. How about double pistols with bayonets on a Shadow type character? Dual wielding rocks... L2P scrub.
Lookout for the dual talon GI world!
Oh my
#67
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:26
Tokenusername wrote...
Go watch your movie so I don't have to listen to your terrible opinions.megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
I'm glad this conversation is over.megabeast37215 wrote...
Tokenusername wrote...
Weapon balance doesn't matter because this isn't a PvP game?
It matters but to a lesser degree
I bet you are... It sucks to be wrong.
Aww... Someone sure is surly... Kinda reminds me of GallowsPole.
#68
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:31
#69
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:32
Tantum Dic Verbo wrote...
Got no use for guns, Reks. I'm bringing the Priest Knife.
Which one, there were a lot of knives in that movie.
#70
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:45
VaultingFrog wrote...
Tantum Dic Verbo wrote...
Got no use for guns, Reks. I'm bringing the Priest Knife.
Which one, there were a lot of knives in that movie.
You lost me.
#71
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:45
Tantum Dic Verbo wrote...
VaultingFrog wrote...
Tantum Dic Verbo wrote...
Got no use for guns, Reks. I'm bringing the Priest Knife.
Which one, there were a lot of knives in that movie.
You lost me.
Never mind, thought you were mentioning the movie Priest....
#72
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:48
#73
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:49
I shout that no matter what the occasion. It feels right. Also, I have to constantly remind people that it is my planet.
Modifié par A3 Reks, 21 décembre 2013 - 02:51 .
#74
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:51
A3 Reks wrote...
Tantum speaks of his religious duties in the Hegemony. Please, no one touch the collection plate. (And yes, I laughed. A lot)
I just hope I never have to use it. I would never be able to explain why I'm giggling.
#75
Posté 21 décembre 2013 - 02:52





Retour en haut







