56 réponses à ce sujet

[dirtypaulie]

The mini nuke is up on the universe page

Modifié par dirtypaulie, 20 janvier 2010 - 08:49 .

[casedawgz]

That's what I'm talking about.

[Marlina]

OH YEAH!

Shame about no radiation though. :'(

[Admoniter]

I think I'm in love.

[Soruyao]

Nice, I like how they explained it using the high explosive rounds from the first game. Sounds like it'll be fun to use.

[Sialboats]

Meh. It's tacky.

[RogueAI]

Yeah, it is obvious that this weapon was made for the 12 year old shooter crowd.

[DaftPaycheck]

Xaeldaren wrote...

Eugh. The design looks cheap, and ME2 really didn't need a Fatman. It was ridiculous in Fallout 3, and it's ridiculous here.

If I'm fighting a thresher maw on foot, I'm going to want as big a gun as I can carry

[dirtypaulie]

DaftPaycheck wrote...

Xaeldaren wrote...

Eugh. The design looks cheap, and ME2 really didn't need a Fatman. It was ridiculous in Fallout 3, and it's ridiculous here.

If I'm fighting a thresher maw on foot, I'm going to want as big a gun as I can carry

Nuff said

[Birdman117]

Just another reason to get Mordin early.

[Marlina]

Birdman117 wrote...

Just another reason to get Mordin early.

Hell yes! I'm starting to love that guy! He's a real utilitarian at heart! 

[rines]

3rd thread!

[lv12medic]

Holy physics batman!

[Sledgehammer44mm]

I'm sure going to use this weapon a lot. Now only if they had a minigun... oh yeah!!! lol

[WrexShepard]

"Herp a derp this copy Fallout triple it r stupid hnuurrrr I DUN WANT COOL GUNS GUIYS DURRR"





Shucks to you, naysayers! I for one welcome our new non-nuclear explosive overlords.

[cyvaris]

Ohh yeah **** just got real.

[Warlokki]

So, where's the recoil going? On that small weapon, i can't belive ME fields could absorb it (and even then, what would happen to the weapon or environment. Energy doesn't just vanish... any "Scifi" that breaks that rule is no Scifi at all)

[WrexShepard]

Warlokki wrote...

So, where's the recoil going? On that small weapon, i can't belive ME fields could absorb it (and even then, what would happen to the weapon or environment. Energy doesn't just vanish... any "Scifi" that breaks that rule is no Scifi at all)

Did you look at that thing? It's not exactly small. I'm sure that much of the weapon's bulk is inertial dampeners.

[BlackwindTheCommander]

M-92 CAIN? M Cain? McCain? as in John McCain? is my mind reaching to make a connecton here?

[Schneidend]

Warlokki wrote...

So, where's the recoil going? On that
small weapon, i can't belive ME fields could absorb it (and even then,
what would happen to the weapon or environment. Energy doesn't just
vanish... any "Scifi" that breaks that rule is no Scifi at all)

You already answered your own question. Mass effect fields absorb the
recoil. That you can't imagine it does not make it less true.

WrexShepard wrote...

"Herp a derp this copy Fallout triple it r stupid hnuurrrr I DUN WANT COOL GUNS GUIYS DURRR"


Shucks to you, naysayers! I for one welcome our new non-nuclear explosive overlords.

Also, this. Lol.

Modifié par Schneidend, 20 janvier 2010 - 11:17 .

[Collider]

Vote for Mccain.

[WrexShepard]

BlackwindTheCommander wrote...

M-92 CAIN? M Cain? McCain? as in John McCain? is my mind reaching to make a connecton here?

Probably a reference to Cain and Abel. The biblical Cain committed the sin of murder, the FIRST murder, if you believe the story, by killing his brother, Abel.
http://en.wikipedia....i/Cain_and_Abel

If Killing is a sin, the M-92 Cain is going to be doing a lot of sinning.

[NvVanity]

Now if only we had the Cain when we fought Saren....

[Saberdark]

@Blackwind
More than likely.

There are a number of other Cains it could be referring to. Personally, I would say they're talking about the original one.

Modifié par Saberdark, 20 janvier 2010 - 11:21 .