Aller au contenu

Photo

Templars vs Mages - If you had to choose??


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
442 réponses à ce sujet

#176
PinkysPain

PinkysPain
  • Members
  • 817 messages

dragonflight288 wrote...
Or have a Qunari invasion and pretty much force both sides to stop fighting simply to maintain their ways of life without being killed, their tongues cut out and their mouths sewn shut, or forcibly converted.

That doesn't "end" the war, it just puts it on a backburner ... the only way to end it is to change the way magic works.

Modifié par PinkysPain, 30 décembre 2013 - 03:55 .


#177
Treacherous J Slither

Treacherous J Slither
  • Members
  • 1 338 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

@JSlither: Where do you get demonic possession is a "fringe" threat? It happens ALL the time in two games.

Now, you could say: "It only happens in Circles." Yeah - it only happens where mages are, and mages are - for the most part - in Circles.

People cannot use the PC, and their own ego, to diminish the demonic threat - the person I would trust LEAST to handle demons, would be the person confident they could handle demons.


The Warden and Hawke see and do many things that the average thedosian will only dream of. Your average guy isn't fighting undead, dragons, darkspawn etc. Your average guy isn't hanging out in Dalish camps or ancient dwarven cities. Your average guy isn't wiping out gangs of bandits.
Even if mages lived among mundanes it would still be rare seeing as how mages themselves are rare.

Modifié par JSlither, 30 décembre 2013 - 04:02 .


#178
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

dragonflight288 wrote...

I don't think Alrik went to that great of length. True, Alrik really got onto his inferior for questioning his orders and pretty much kept him from going to Meredith, and Kerras warned Alain not to tell anyone about him going into his room at night, but a simple walk around the Gallows courtyard is enough to gather all necessary evidence against them. For Alrik, just count how many new tranquil there are, what they're saying and how they even say they belong to Alrik now. 

I don't think you should take the ambient dialogue (or monologue technically) too seriously. It is there to set the atmosphere but that is about it. And the Gallows is a Circle with historically high numbers of failed Harrowings and Blood Mages. I don't think anyone can keep full track of every single Tranquil there. The Circle must house several hundreds of amges, remembering everyone of them by name and face, will be nigh on impossible for the higer ranked Templars, who probably don't have daily interactions with the lower ranked mages. And the lower ranked Templars are being coerced by Alrik to not bring the issue to Meredith.
Basically it is a case of the higher ups not knowing anything is amiss (and having no reasonable way of finding out on their own), and the lower ranks being incapable of bringing the issue up.

dragonflight288 wrote...
But that brings me to the next thing you brought up. When did the templars stop fearing when the Seeker's showed up? When did they stop caring about being investigated? It's not really clear in the time-line so I won't speculate on that, but I think we can agree that as of the events of Asunder, or more accurately before the novel began but after Kirkwall, that the system wasn't working like it was originally designed in the Nevarran Accord where mages were allowed a certain level of autonomy whereas templars merely watched and advised (Gregoire, as well as World of Thedas on the Nevarran Accord.)

I don't know when things started going downhill, but the system as of the Dragon Age doesn't work and needs reformation.

I would guess that it really started deteriorating the moment Lambert was named High Lord Seeker. He was clearly better suited in the role as a Templar, but the Divine in her eternal wisdom made him Lord Seeker. Which brings me to my other point, the Templars had a high influence over the previous Divine (whose name I cannot remember), so it stands to reason that they would influence her to install a Lord Seeker who would be more sympathetic to the Templars than doing his actual job.
Now don't get me wrong, I think what most of Lambert does in Asunder is fully justified, and even the correct course of action, but... His fervor does get the better of him, and as I said he would have been a far better Knight-Commander (or even Knight-Divine which supposedly is the highest ranking Templar) than Lord Seeker.


I honestly don't think Beatrice (I think that ws her name) knew what she was doing when she appointed Lambert seeker.  Rhys recalls that when he was promoted to senior enchanter she was an extremely senile old lady who thought the tower was under attack when told the mages had arrived and insisted that no, she didn't want any oatmeal.  By the time of Lambert's appointment, if the dementia had progressed the way it tends to, she would have been more or less incapable of any kind of recognizeable thought.  She might not have even been able to sign her name.  My theory is that someone completed the paperwork and shoved it in front of her to affix her seal to.

I'm not a Lambert fan.  He lost me when he told Evangeline to kill everyone if it turned out that Pharamond had found out something dangerous.  At the end of the book when he turned against the will of the Divine herself I was already pretty sure about his overall character and that cinched it.

#179
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages
Oops, double post.  Sorry.

Modifié par Magdalena11, 30 décembre 2013 - 04:25 .


#180
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

@JSlither: Where do you get demonic possession is a "fringe" threat? It happens ALL the time in two games.

Now, you could say: "It only happens in Circles." Yeah - it only happens where mages are, and mages are - for the most part - in Circles.

People cannot use the PC, and their own ego, to diminish the demonic threat - the person I would trust LEAST to handle demons, would be the person confident they could handle demons.


I think "It happens ALL the time..." is a little strong, especially since I'm pretty sure I remember seeing you post that you haven't finished DA2.

To summarize:  The circle tower was a mess and that was the point.  Uldred was responsible directly or indirectly for all the abominations.  Yes, he was a senior enchanter who fell victim to pride.  One.  Connor didn't know any better and became possessed.  Two.  Wynne, I suppose.  Three.  If I've forgotten any, forgive me but I think you'll see this hardly qualifies as "ALL the time."  Kirkwall was a little different but there was a reason for that.  I don't think you got to this part if you stopped halfway through but the Enigma of Kirkwall codex entries gradually reveal that it was once a center of blood magic and has a history of a higher than normal number of blood mages and failed harrowings.  Add that to an unjust situation with a loony at the helm and no way out and abominations may occur.

Elsewhere in Thedas abominations were far from common.  Rhys is allowed by the first enchanter of the white spire to pursue his research on spirits into the fade.  This would have never happened if abominations were in any way common.  In fact, I think the only 3 mentioned in the entire book are Pharamond, Wynne and Evangeline and the one for the women is the same spirit.

I infer from your post that you know the inquisitor can't be possessed if he or she is a mage.  That's good.

I don't think the facts support the statement that harrowed mages turn to abominations frequently.  I don't think human beings and elves should be caged because of a few individuals or the theoretical harm they might do.

#181
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

PinkysPain wrote...

dragonflight288 wrote...
Or have a Qunari invasion and pretty much force both sides to stop fighting simply to maintain their ways of life without being killed, their tongues cut out and their mouths sewn shut, or forcibly converted.

That doesn't "end" the war, it just puts it on a backburner ... the only way to end it is to change the way magic works.


Not necessarily. Sure, the war goes on the back burner, but war is the great equalizer. And based on how that war goes, it may completely destroy the Chantry and the templar order as a whole, or it may end with the Qunari winning, all the mages becoming Serebaas and having their mouths sewn shut and all the templars killed, forcibly converted, or stripped of all will and personality and are made slaves of the Qun, something Fenris says the Qunari do to those who refuse to convert entirely as they don't believe in wasting anything, not even life.

#182
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

JSlither wrote...

I support the mages. With training they are no longer dangerous and oppressing them cannot be justified.


HAHAHAHAHAHA


Should Professor Xavier of Marvels X-Men be locked up?
Should his enemy Magneto be locked up?


Yes. Definately.

Some of them have the power to frak up the entire planet.
You can't let those people roam free just because they said they are nice.

ESPECIALLY Xavier.


One is praised for his good deeds. The other is hated for his evil deeds. They are judged on their actions. Only ignorant, hateful fools fearful of their power condemn them both.


No. smart people know that in Real Life characters like Xavier don't and can't exist. And even some of the X-Men comics noticed that.
Smart people also know you cannot trust a person capable of altering your mind, memoeries and personality.

#183
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Magdalena11 wrote..
I don't think the facts support the statement that harrowed mages turn to abominations frequently.  I don't think human beings and elves should be caged because of a few individuals or the theoretical harm they might do.


Then I guess you're agaisnt quaranteens and locking people into mental wards?

#184
KainD

KainD
  • Members
  • 8 624 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
Then I guess you're agaisnt quaranteens and locking people into mental wards?


I am. If you can't live with them, just kill them. wtf? 
You put rabid dogs to sleep, not orginize a special preserve for them. 

#185
Kaiser Arian XVII

Kaiser Arian XVII
  • Members
  • 17 283 messages
Blood Mages = Mentally disturbed fellows with time bombs

No training can stop them being dangerous and even if you annoy them they KABOOM you with demons.

#186
Fast Jimmy

Fast Jimmy
  • Members
  • 17 939 messages
And what of the families who would murder their own child if they started showing magic behaviors? What of the village that would blame every death, crop failure and sickness on the local Mage and kill them for it? What of the Mages who would be forced to hide their own power, having no formal training and be even more likely to hurt themselves or someone else?

The Circles provide just as much protection to Mages as it does to the outside world.

#187
KainD

KainD
  • Members
  • 8 624 messages

Fast Jimmy wrote...

And what of the families who would murder their own child if they started showing magic behaviors? What of the village that would blame every death, crop failure and sickness on the local Mage and kill them for it? What of the Mages who would be forced to hide their own power, having no formal training and be even more likely to hurt themselves or someone else?


Born in the wrong country, should travel to Tevinter. 

#188
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Magdalena11 wrote..
I don't think the facts support the statement that harrowed mages turn to abominations frequently.  I don't think human beings and elves should be caged because of a few individuals or the theoretical harm they might do.


Then I guess you're agaisnt quaranteens and locking people into mental wards?


Yes, I am and by the way, nice analogies.  Universal precautions and specific barrier-based precautions have replaced quarantine for all but a very minute number of specific, already diagnosed, active conditions.  People who have a disease in its dormant state or who are not actually spreading body fluids are not restricted.  People are only committed to a locked unit against their will if they have proven that they are a danger to themselves and others by their actions and speech.  They are no longer locked away just because they have received a diagnosis of mental illness.  Only a very small number of beds in mental facilities are on locked wards.  

In both cases, the number of people affected by these restrictions to their liberty is tiny compared to the number of people who were locked away 100 years ago and in both cases it is because their active symptoms prohibit any other action.

Most mass murderers are male.  Would you lock away all males because one of them might lose it and go postal?

To use a medical analogy to explain my stance on tranquilizing mages, we used to lobotomize patients who were diagnosed with a variety of mental illnesses but now know that all it does is destroy their mind. Their symptoms may go away but only because they are incapable of doing anything to express them.  

Modifié par Magdalena11, 30 décembre 2013 - 12:29 .


#189
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages

Fast Jimmy wrote...

And what of the families who would murder their own child if they started showing magic behaviors? What of the village that would blame every death, crop failure and sickness on the local Mage and kill them for it? What of the Mages who would be forced to hide their own power, having no formal training and be even more likely to hurt themselves or someone else?

The Circles provide just as much protection to Mages as it does to the outside world.


You raise a good point (but I think a family would call for the templars before killing their child).  The circle does protect those who can't protect themselves.  If the chantry hadn't indoctrinated the public to be afraid it wouldn't be like that but that boat's already sailed.  Having said this, a mage who has completed training and proven him- or herself to be both capable of adequate defense and self-restraint no longer needs these protections.

I've always wondered how people would know that stranger who came into town is a mage if they're not wearing robes or carrying a staff and they're not using magic in public.  Do people wear signs around their necks?

#190
thetinyevil

thetinyevil
  • Members
  • 831 messages
Mages.

#191
Warden661

Warden661
  • Members
  • 235 messages

Magdalena11 wrote...


You raise a good point (but I think a family would call for the templars before killing their child).  The circle does protect those who can't protect themselves.  If the chantry hadn't indoctrinated the public to be afraid it wouldn't be like that but that boat's already sailed.  Having said this, a mage who has completed training and proven him- or herself to be both capable of adequate defense and self-restraint no longer needs these protections.


You can blame the peoples' fear of magic on the Tevinter Imperium and mages themselves. Andraste didn't lead a rebellion against the Imperium because she was bored. The ship sailed with Tevinter at the wheel.

Modifié par BoBear, 30 décembre 2013 - 12:57 .


#192
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages

BoBear wrote...

Magdalena11 wrote...


You raise a good point (but I think a family would call for the templars before killing their child).  The circle does protect those who can't protect themselves.  If the chantry hadn't indoctrinated the public to be afraid it wouldn't be like that but that boat's already sailed.  Having said this, a mage who has completed training and proven him- or herself to be both capable of adequate defense and self-restraint no longer needs these protections.


You can blame the peoples fear of magic on the Tevinter Imperium and mages themselves. Andraste didn't lead a rebellion against the Imperium because she was bored. The ship sailed with Tevinter at the wheel.


Another good point but the Tevinter magisters haven't controlled Ferelden, the Free Marches, Orlais etc. for hundreds of years.  Mages can't have political power but they can have rights.  If the hate and fear hadn't been kept alive after the danger was past things might have been different.  Of course might have beens are pointless and the world of the inquisition must be dealt with as it is found.

To reiterate - I support the mages because they are capable of contributing to society as healers, workers and protectors.  The only purpose templars serve that couldn't be filled as well by a city guard or a standing army is to restrict mages, a job that could easily be filled by the mages themselves.  I think everyone deserves the right to govern themselves.

#193
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Magdalena11 wrote...

Another good point but the Tevinter magisters haven't controlled Ferelden, the Free Marches, Orlais etc. for hundreds of years.  Mages can't have political power but they can have rights.  If the hate and fear hadn't been kept alive after the danger was past things might have been different.  Of course might have beens are pointless and the world of the inquisition must be dealt with as it is found.

Mages may not hold any political power any more, but the people are still fully aware of the destructive capabilities of mages, and it is this which causes the fear and resentment. Not to mention that the Circle is of little comfort for a village ,if a blood mage or Abomination is already ravaging the village.

Magdalena11 wrote...

To reiterate - I support the mages because they are capable of contributing to society as healers, workers and protectors.  The only purpose templars serve that couldn't be filled as well by a city guard or a standing army is to restrict mages, a job that could easily be filled by the mages themselves.  I think everyone deserves the right to govern themselves.

City Guards are barely trained militia, Templars are highly trained elite soldiers. If that isn't enough of a discrepancy to discourage the City Guard handling mages, then there is the issue of Lyrium.

#194
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages
[quote]EmperorSahlertz wrote...

[quote]Magdalena11 wrote...

Another good point but the Tevinter magisters haven't controlled Ferelden, the Free Marches, Orlais etc. for hundreds of years.  Mages can't have political power but they can have rights.  If the hate and fear hadn't been kept alive after the danger was past things might have been different.  Of course might have beens are pointless and the world of the inquisition must be dealt with as it is found.

[/quote]
Mages may not hold any political power any more, but the people are still fully aware of the destructive capabilities of mages, and it is this which causes the fear and resentment. Not to mention that the Circle is of little comfort for a village ,if a blood mage or Abomination is already ravaging the village.[/quote]
Trained adult mages are unlikely to torch a village if the baker sells short weight.  They realize the potential consequences of their actions.  Remember that Willhelm lived in his tower in Honnleath and Rhys' sometime boss traveled to Tevinter to spy with Ryhs in tow under full permission of the circle.  I discussed the actual rarity of abominations in a previous post.

[quote]Magdalena11 wrote...

To reiterate - I support the mages because they are capable of contributing to society as healers, workers and protectors.  The only purpose templars serve that couldn't be filled as well by a city guard or a standing army is to restrict mages, a job that could easily be filled by the mages themselves.  I think everyone deserves the right to govern themselves.

[/quote]
City Guards are barely trained militia, Templars are highly trained elite soldiers. If that isn't enough of a discrepancy to discourage the City Guard handling mages, then there is the issue of Lyrium.

[/quote]
If templars can be trained so can guards and militia.  If templars can recruit any random orphan dropped on their doorstep and turn him into an elite soldier so can the guards and standing army.  Note I did not use the word militia.  There's a difference.

Yes, there's the issue of lyrium.  It's expensive, addictive and encourages crime (the carta and coterie.)  If mages were allowed to police their own, lyrium wouldn't be needed by the the vast majority of the people who use it.  Actually, it would be because those who already use it are addicted but no new templars would get hooked.

#195
Magdalena11

Magdalena11
  • Members
  • 2 843 messages

Magdalena11 wrote...

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Magdalena11 wrote...

Another good point but the Tevinter magisters haven't controlled Ferelden, the Free Marches, Orlais etc. for hundreds of years.  Mages can't have political power but they can have rights.  If the hate and fear hadn't been kept alive after the danger was past things might have been different.  Of course might have beens are pointless and the world of the inquisition must be dealt with as it is found.

Mages may not hold any political power any more, but the people are still fully aware of the destructive capabilities of mages, and it is this which causes the fear and resentment. Not to mention that the Circle is of little comfort for a village ,if a blood mage or Abomination is already ravaging the village.

Trained adult mages are unlikely to torch a village if the baker sells short weight.  They realize the potential consequences of their actions.  Remember that Willhelm lived in his tower in Honnleath and Rhys' sometime boss traveled to Tevinter to spy with Ryhs in tow under full permission of the circle.  I discussed the actual rarity of abominations in a previous post.

Magdalena11 wrote...

To reiterate - I support the mages because they are capable of contributing to society as healers, workers and protectors.  The only purpose templars serve that couldn't be filled as well by a city guard or a standing army is to restrict mages, a job that could easily be filled by the mages themselves.  I think everyone deserves the right to govern themselves.

EmporerSahlertz wrote...
City Guards are barely trained militia, Templars are highly trained elite soldiers. If that isn't enough of a discrepancy to discourage the City Guard handling mages, then there is the issue of Lyrium.

If templars can be trained so can guards and militia.  If templars can recruit any random orphan dropped on their doorstep and turn him into an elite soldier so can the guards and standing army.  Note I did not use the word militia.  There's a difference.

Yes, there's the issue of lyrium.  It's expensive, addictive and encourages crime (the carta and coterie.)  If mages were allowed to police their own, lyrium wouldn't be needed by the the vast majority of the people who use it.  Actually, it would be because those who already use it are addicted but no new templars would get hooked.



#196
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Magdalena11 wrote...

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Magdalena11 wrote...

Another good point but the Tevinter magisters haven't controlled Ferelden, the Free Marches, Orlais etc. for hundreds of years.  Mages can't have political power but they can have rights.  If the hate and fear hadn't been kept alive after the danger was past things might have been different.  Of course might have beens are pointless and the world of the inquisition must be dealt with as it is found.

Mages may not hold any political power any more, but the people are still fully aware of the destructive capabilities of mages, and it is this which causes the fear and resentment. Not to mention that the Circle is of little comfort for a village ,if a blood mage or Abomination is already ravaging the village.

Trained adult mages are unlikely to torch a village if the baker sells short weight.  They realize the potential consequences of their actions.  Remember that Willhelm lived in his tower in Honnleath and Rhys' sometime boss traveled to Tevinter to spy with Ryhs in tow under full permission of the circle.  I discussed the actual rarity of abominations in a previous post.

The only reason Abominations are so rare is because the mages are being controlled to such a high degree. And while trained CIRCLE mages are unlikely to cause accidents and/or incidents, hedge mages are an entirely different matter, and blood mages an entirely third matter. Hedge mages do not have any formal certified trainning, and may therefore snap at any moment, and blood mages could just want to cut up the entire village to just get enough blood for whatever ritual he was planning.

Magdalena11 wrote...

'

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Magdalena11 wrote...

To reiterate - I support the mages because they are capable of contributing to society as healers, workers and protectors.  The only purpose templars serve that couldn't be filled as well by a city guard or a standing army is to restrict mages, a job that could easily be filled by the mages themselves.  I think everyone deserves the right to govern themselves.

City Guards are barely trained militia, Templars are highly trained elite soldiers. If that isn't enough of a discrepancy to discourage the City Guard handling mages, then there is the issue of Lyrium.

If templars can be trained so can guards and militia.  If templars can recruit any random orphan dropped on their doorstep and turn him into an elite soldier so can the guards and standing army.  Note I did not use the word militia.  There's a difference.

Yes, there's the issue of lyrium.  It's expensive, addictive and encourages crime (the carta and coterie.)  If mages were allowed to police their own, lyrium wouldn't be needed by the the vast majority of the people who use it.  Actually, it would be because those who already use it are addicted but no new templars would get hooked.

There are no "standing armies" in Thedas. Other than the Templars, the Kirkwall City Guard and the Qunari. At least none that we know of.
No one is going to drop of an orphan at the city guards doorstep, and the city guard probably wouldn't even bother with raising one even if someone did. And you seriously overestimate the budget of a city guard if you think that they can train, equip and supply their troopers with the same quality of services that the Chantry can supply the Templars.
And mages cannot be allowed to self-govern, all previous caes of this has proven that mages will eventually end up ruling the society with no hope for the mundanes to ever reach government posistions.

So no, the city guards cannot ever take over the roles of the Templars, bse don simple logistics and budgettary limitations, but also on plain and simple experience.

#197
Fast Jimmy

Fast Jimmy
  • Members
  • 17 939 messages

You raise a good point (but I think a family would call for the templars before killing their child). The circle does protect those who can't protect themselves. If the chantry hadn't indoctrinated the public to be afraid it wouldn't be like that but that boat's already sailed. Having said this, a mage who has completed training and proven him- or herself to be both capable of adequate defense and self-restraint no longer needs these protections.


Okay, so a couple things...

The Chantry didn't indoctrinate people to be afraid of Mages... the Mages did that. The original history of the Inquisition was that it was created to protect the general populace from maleficar, blood mages and the demons/abominations they either intentionally or inadvertently released. There was no Templars to call, no protection to be had.

When people say "abolish the Circle" but then suggest that people should just call on the Templars if anything goes wrong, that's insanely naive. There are only Templars numbering in the dozens assigned to a Circle... there isn't NEARLY enough to have a force sizeable enough to take down one abomination, let along a group of Blood Mages if it came to that, in every town, village and hamlet. People would be defenseless if things went awry and they didn't happen to live in a major area with some form of protection.

And who would be giving these tests, by the way? Other Mages? Where would this be done, if not in a Circle setting? Would it be the same test? Many Mages would rather be made into mindless slaves than take the Harrowing - would that still be the case, even though many feel it is inhumane? If someone were to fail the test and become an abomination, who would put that Mage down? As we can see from DA:O, one Abominated Mage can take down and infect an entire Circle's worth of Mages.

Is the Circle system perfect? No. It is not.

Does it provide tons of safeguards and structure to keep the world at large safe? Yes. Absolutely.

People who feel the Circle needs to be destroyed are basically saying "the lives of innocents don't matter to me - I'd rather see people (mundane and Mages both) die and suffer just so I can say Mages are free." 

Changing the Circle to allow for more freedom as well as having some better form of checks and balances to prevent Templar abuse is a valid request. Tearing down the whole system and violently throwing mages and the rest of the world back together is not.

Modifié par Fast Jimmy, 30 décembre 2013 - 02:20 .


#198
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 489 messages

Fast Jimmy wrote...


Does it provide tons of safeguards and structure to keep the world at large safe? Yes. Absolutely.


Image IPB

#199
The Elder King

The Elder King
  • Members
  • 19 630 messages
Pardon us, Thekomandorshepard, if we don't believe that the right solution is to kill 99% of the mages.

#200
rasloveszev

rasloveszev
  • Members
  • 279 messages

eluvianix wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

@MisterJB Congratulations! You just showed just how brutal the Templar's are. Look how they're murdering the innocent mages of the Circle. Great job exposing your Templar's true form.

No, the point of the post was to show that by forcing the Gallows conflict, Anders caused quite a few innocent deaths, both mages and nonmages, caught in the crossfire.


Revolutions RARELY end peacefully. When war happens PEOPLE DIE, ESPECIALLY INNOCENT PEOPLE! Hell, even Anders said "Better to have a quick death than a slow one."