23 réponses à ce sujet

[Artifex_Imperius]

so will the council continue to ban making artificial intelligence?

[Clayless]

If you picked Destroy then of course. It's not like the arrival of the Reapers are going to convince the galaxy that AI's are totally ok now.

If you picked Control it would depend on whether or not the Geth are alive I suppose.

Synthesis would probably be yes. Assuming it affected the galaxy on a molecular level then it's assumed that new AI would already be the same as everyone else, if it never then perhaps they would be new, true, AI, which could lead to an interesting conflict. I assume it just affected everything in the galaxy though.

[SwobyJ]

(Literal story view)

Destroy with no Geth - Yes
Destroy with Geth - Maybe
Destroy with Peace - No
*whatever AI happens will be a dangerous situation

Control with no Geth - Yes
Control with Geth - Maybe
Control with Peace - No
*whatever AI happens will be more regulated

Synthesis with no Geth - No
Synthesis with Geth - No
Synthesis with Peace - No

This is my guess.

[justafan]

In destroy, of course it will. Regardless of one public good dead by the Geth, people will hardly forget that they were almost exterminated by AI.

In control, what the council decrees is irrelevant, the Shepalyst overlord has final say.

As for synthesis, well everything is crazy in that ending so anything is possible.

[DeinonSlayer]

I'd say peace above Rannoch is the only condition which could begin to sway opinion, regardless of whether Destroy is chosen. If the Geth are wiped out, the entire galaxy will have only ever known the Geth as isolationists hostile to all organic life, even before aligning with the Reapers. If they wipe out the Quarians, they will continue to be viewed with suspicion and fear on account of what they've done, as they were after the Morning War (the Council, according to Revelation, pointed to the war as evidence to uphold the ban). Something of a "we can't beat them, so we have to learn to live with them" mindset.

Unless everyone had their brains pickled by the Green Euphoria Wave of course. People are gleefully shaking hands with the machines that were reducing their loved ones to slurpees mere days before in that one (even after all this time I have to shake my head at what the hell they were thinking when they wrote that).

[CynicalShep]

I don't think ME4 will be as related to the trilogy as everybody else seems to think. So not necessarily, OP. Not even sure there'll be a Council, tbh.

[SwobyJ]

CynicalShep wrote...

I don't think ME4 will be as related to the trilogy as everybody else seems to think. So not necessarily, OP. Not even sure there'll be a Council, tbh.

I don't think there will be a council either. I'm hankering for worldbuilding details from Bioware. Next year it is guaranteed that we'll be getting them... yum yummm

[TheTurtle]

If it is I hope we don't have to dwell on it to long. The synthetics vs. organics thing has overstayed it's welcome

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

It will depend upon what Mac Walters decides. I don't think it will have anything to do with your choice of endings.

[Ieldra]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
It will depend upon what Mac Walters decides. I don't think it will have anything to do with your choice of endings.

If the next game is a sequel and there is no canon ending, then this should depend on your choice. I suspect, though, that we'll get either a canon ending or no sequel since I think they want their new game to be completely independent from the trilogy.

[FlamingBoy]

I think the word "maybe" could perhaps have no greater meaning in relation to this question.

[SwobyJ]

Ieldra2 wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
It will depend upon what Mac Walters decides. I don't think it will have anything to do with your choice of endings.

If the next game is a sequel and there is no canon ending, then this should depend on your choice. I suspect, though, that we'll get either a canon ending or no sequel since I think they want their new game to be completely independent from the trilogy.

Depends what canon and choice means.

[The Heretic of Time]

The writers will probably make up some stupid reason why A.I.s are still banned post ME3 for every possible ending scenario, and then go from there.

Or they'll do the opposite and make up a stupid reason why A.I.s are not banned anymore for every possible ending scenario.

Whatever the case, they'll simply trivialize our choices and lead all different outcomes back together down the same path, as they always do.

Modifié par Heretic_Hanar, 30 décembre 2013 - 12:26 .

[Reorte]

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

Whatever the case, they'll simply trivialize our choices and lead all different outcomes back together down the same path, as they always do.

They'll probably do it to come across like that but it really isn't feasible to keep dragging on baggage from every previous game. A new game needs a clean sheet from player choice (pity it needs it from writers' choices too), and a little handwaving is a lesser evil than sticking to low-key prequels forever.

[Ravensword]

CynicalShep wrote...

I don't think ME4 will be as related to the trilogy as everybody else seems to think. So not necessarily, OP. Not even sure there'll be a Council, tbh.

Didn't the devs say that they were gonna reboot the series? That would seems to make the most sense. They wouldn't have to deal w/ the mess of the endings and how that affects the future of the in-game world.

[Reorte]

justafan wrote...

In destroy, of course it will. Regardless of one public good dead by the Geth, people will hardly forget that they were almost exterminated by AI.

Depressingly true because people are idiots, it's not the Reapers were partially AI that matters there.

[wright1978]

justafan wrote...

In destroy, of course it will. Regardless of one public good dead by the Geth, people will hardly forget that they were almost exterminated by AI.

In control, what the council decrees is irrelevant, the Shepalyst overlord has final say.

As for synthesis, well everything is crazy in that ending so anything is possible.

Disagree in destroy. The Geth/EDI dying to defeat of the reapers could make them be raised up as heroes and a new generation of AI's being developed in EDI's vein. Also galaxy is going to be extremely chaotic so enforcement of any ban would be meaningless.

[Daemul]

wright1978 wrote...

justafan wrote...

In destroy, of course it will. Regardless of one public good dead by the Geth, people will hardly forget that they were almost exterminated by AI.

In control, what the council decrees is irrelevant, the Shepalyst overlord has final say.

As for synthesis, well everything is crazy in that ending so anything is possible.

Disagree in destroy. The Geth/EDI dying to defeat of the reapers could make them be raised up as heroes and a new generation of AI's being developed in EDI's vein.

[img]http://i.imgur.com/1iYVIxv.gif[/img]

Thanks for a good laugh. 

Modifié par Daemul, 30 décembre 2013 - 01:20 .

[AlexMBrennan]

Sure, if you are willing to forgive the geth siding with the reapers knowing fully well that they would be destroyed when their new masters triumphed, making their only conceivable motive trying to murder as many quarians as possible.

[IllusiveManJr]

Destroy ending is Canon.

[The Heretic of Time]

IllusiveManJr wrote...

Destroy ending is Canon.

Nah bro you got that wrong, Synthesis ending is clearly the canon one, you'll see. Prepare for a lot of butthurt.

[ImperatorMortis]

 Hopefully. 

[MassivelyEffective0730]

In my universe, yes it is. There is arguably little reason for fully sapient AI's to exist.

[ImperatorMortis]

MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...

In my universe, yes it is. There is arguably little reason for fully sapient AI's to exist.

Exactly. Just causes a lot of problems in the long run. 

Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 30 décembre 2013 - 05:33 .