In Exile wrote...
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Any source that claims that people are being severely punished for the slightest crime, while simultaneously claiming that only a dozen were punished so in the last year, is trying to sell you a bridge. One that many people seem to buy, considering that for all that we know of one serial abuser who has to act in secrecy, the assumption becomes that almost everyone in the Circle is being raped
That's not what Anders said.
He's citing a letter, somewhat, but the point remains.
Citing the number of US executions does not tell us the number of prisoners in total. It's the same here, looking at the number of mages made tranquil.
That's turning apples and apples to apples and oranges. Two different standards of numbers, since in this context it wouldn't be number of prisoners in total but rather... the total number of executions. Because, in his words, the smallest crime is meeting that punishment. If all crimes garner the punishment, then the number of punishments is the number of crimes.
When someone says 'people are being executed for the smallest sin,' and 'a dozen were executed last year', that implies one of two things: either only twelve people made any sins in the last year, or that the first claim was wildly exagerated. Having spent the better part of the last year working with people in stressful environments, I have no doubt you can find more than twelve ****ups a person in a year, let alone twelve in a group of any significant size.
In this case, when Anders is talking about tranquility, it's the later. We see a number of repeat offenders who are not made tranquil, even when by all rights they could have or even should have, so the smallest thing part is demonstratably an exageration. But then, so is a lot of Anders' dialogue in general- once he grips on a legitimate grievance he tosses accuracy away for impact, and so begins to blow it out of proportion and ignore mitigations. Take that previously quoted dialogue exchange between him and Bethany, in which he claims that the Templars are making dissidents tranquil to prevent debate. This is complete and utter bull****, because we know of a number of times (and so does he) when mages talk or discuss and press grievances without being made so. That was a case of Anders employing a reducto ad absurdem fallacy in order to score rhetorical points and justify his stance of a life-or-death struggle. When, well, it wasn't.
It's the same misuse of rhetoric that has people going 'the Templars are raping the mages!' rather than 'one templar in particular is raping a small number of people in secret, for fear of being caught and having his ass hanged by the authority.' One implies a huge systemic trend, and the other points out that not only is it an outlier, it's an outlier that would be punished by its own group if his deviance was caught.
Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 05 janvier 2014 - 06:32 .