There is signal based indoctrination (more pure interference of organic minds).
Then there is:
-huskification (which is actually super-rapid implant replacement indoctrination)
-nanite based indoctrination (which huskifying is just the most rapid form of)
-implant based indoctrination (which is a more solid and reliable, yet damaging form of nanite based indoctrination)
-assuming direct control (requires either full genetic engineering into accepting huge amounts of tech, or just being almost entirely tech anyway)
-They can probably Enthrall too, but as we see in Leviathan, something like that seems to require a range from an orb, while Reaper Indoctrination or Assuming Control can instead be done even at very, very, very long ranges.
Signals are amplified through mini-QEC-ish methods. The concept is about affecting the organic mind without reducing its use, because a fully synthetic mind, as far as the Reapers' capability or preference is considered, is just a husk.
The signal based indoc is, if we follow conventional lore now, the most based off of Leviathan enthrallment if we ignore assuming control.
However, all the implant/tech/nanite/Dragon's Teeth based stuff is 'new', derived from how the Intelligence (whatever it is) views the method and how it should be improved.
Think of it this way - if the Leviathan created a galaxy of cultish followers who both feared and praised them, the Reapers went further by creating an 'army of pawns' and essentially a more outright religious devotion to themselves by overwriting the mind itself.
And that's what any tech-based (inplant, husking, nantie) Indoctrination does. It doesn't just hypnotize you or whisper into you - it outright converts (remember, QEC) your mind itself, bit by bit, into a person who is entirely on the Reapers' side.
What happens to the real you? Is it just deleted? I dunno. It's my personal belief that in tech based indoc, the subject does exist somewhere in the Reaper (cloud? lol heaven..) and that's the Reapers' justification for doing what they're doing to as. As long as they 'save' (state) us, in some form, that's all the matters to them. The body is a machine, yadda yadda..
Purely signal based indoc is a weaker form of this, but seems to be just as effective and better in most cases for sleeper agents. In signal-based, the subject might, with strong will, maintain themselves somewhere, but it becomes a smaller and smaller room in their mind until it smothers them (Benezia). Tech based indoc is more of a mystery, outside of the Greyson experiments where he found his body itself not responding to things he was intending to do. It's more of a hacking (which might compromise the organic part of mind still), while signal-based seems like closer to a hypnotism mixed with brain mushing and possible insanity
Modifié par SwobyJ, 07 janvier 2014 - 08:51 .