[quote]Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...
Just to clarify, some of these arguments assume there's anything to your attempts at using gameplay and cutscenes as an argument, when both the devs and common sense tell you aren't going to really reflect the lore 100%. (Although I have seen worse discrepancies. My first time through the mission in GTA:SA where Carl's digging a grave for himself, I was actually confused as to why holding a gun, and not even an automatic, to his head was a sufficient threat to motivate him to do that after breezing through endlessly worse odds. By comparison, a mage being able to throw a templar into a wall with a gesture seems about right.)
[quote]TheKomandorShepard wrote...
1.Don't like power fo the dark side?

[/quote]
There's nothing wrong with showing
some ruthlessness for the greater good, but I don't think either describes you.
[quote]
2.I pointed that in another conversation on that same topic there were only 1 individual and 1 group of non-mages that showed support for mage it was quest giver for pro-mage hawke and ferelden refugees who were in situation "i need you" pulling situation "you are hero as long we need you" on anders.[/quote]
Meredith apparently had death squads, in the plural, to solve this problem. She would not have needed that if your impression even resembled the way things really were.
[quote]
3.Because they were idiots especially cullen they could sense it in lothering in my mage and morrigan as "something is wrong with you" that should be enough to any thinking person to tell who is mage or not. [/quote]
Either could be explained in light of the mage's bearing. Unless you think you need to somehow know Morrigan is a mage to know something is wrong with her.
[quote]
4.But she didn't and she is dead so much for mage power so much for unlimited power "im invincible oh damn this enemy can move i need at leas 15 seconds to cast crappy flamethrower oh im dead.":lol:[/quote]
That's why the mage is supposed to either wear armor or hide behind someone who is. And it's not like Carver does any better.
[quote]
5.Yes and their advantage almost caused the end of the world when one of their mages escaped and wanted summon demon army

good work qunari thats what you get for being control freeks and that qunari control mages is rather weak move toward "mages are useful" because well qunari want control everyone so... [/quote]
I strongly doubt that he can end the world with a demon army any more than you can kill every mage in the world. Seriously, it's an entire world. Grow a sense of scale.
[quote]
6.No? so i guess they lost their power over centuries because now they lost almost every their fight templar or not [/quote]
If by that you mean they forgot to bring a tank this time...
[quote]
or simple that was just historical bull...
[/quote]
It's stuff like this that has me half-convinced you're a troll. How many times do I have to point out that if the people in charge of the presses wanted to alter the mages' role in the fighting, it would be to minimize it?
[quote]
7.For example ruthlessy slaughter their civilians as i said qunari have rules and restrictions and every rule and restriction can be used against.
[/quote]
This assumes you can reach those civilians. I've seen no evidence of that. And it's not like the White Chantry's are any better armed.[/quote]
I even wonder that you peoples know that cutscene is part of story not gameplay... unless cutscene is based on game mechanic not on own mechanic which here wasn't in case...
1.There is no such thing as greater good thats it is only excuse to reach own goals in nasty ways i don't need that i just want add some humor to reaching my goals.

2.Well rly she had fanatical templars i didn't know who could possible think that knight commander had templars doing what she wants.As far i renember most peoples wanting only get rid of meredith what i can get not help mages...
3.Not rly if that was in case it would be retarded templar he cleary knew that something is wrong with them and that wasn't mage items.
4.Yes maybe they need also 1000 tousand peoples , tree of immortality and machine gun to be effective?
And what that says that mage isn't rly much effective than non-mage and thats all for their power but non-mage can't be demon i will stay with non-mage who are slightly less effective but can't burn world...
5.Watch da redemption he almost did it so point for me and yes demon can cause that in da dawn of the seeker cassandra who killed golems or blood mages like nothing couldn't even harm him.
6.Of course need mages want maybe immortality , machine guns and dragons fighting for them to be effective? bam more wishes i could be effective as well if i had army behind my back and rocket launcher.

and i can't turn into demon bam!
7.Of course how dear i question history especially that doesn't reflect reality mages remind me him


just that same everyone think he is powerful , can't beat anything and in the end it turns that was only false.
8.Do i have to explain that when thedas united they started push qunari back?
[quote]Pasquale1234 wrote...
[quote]Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...
[quote]Veruin wrote...
If
Anders (and mages in general) were as powerful as they are in gameplay
as in the lore, we'd have people crying and moaning that the game is too
easy.
[/quote]
A: Komandor needs to read this.
B:
Actually, there's already something to that. Did you know there's people
who call the first game "Dragon Mage: Origins?"[/quote]
It's
actually pretty odd that he consistently uses that video to try to prove
templar's power over mages. If you watch past the cutscene, you'll see
mage Hawke & Merrill wreaking havoc on the incoming templars.
There are, of course, quite a few other gameplay videos that show mages battling. Like
this or
this or even
this.
[/quote]
Cutscenes aren't part of gameplay they are part of story so well and you showed me gameplay unless when cutscenes was pulled did i have mention that hawke is protagonist what make him superbadass a way beyond normal mages?
Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 12 janvier 2014 - 05:16 .