Aller au contenu

Photo

What is YOUR solution to the mage and Templar problem?


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
1537 réponses à ce sujet

#651
Pasquale1234

Pasquale1234
  • Members
  • 3 079 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Pasquale1234 wrote...
despite being presented with in-game


Point them please if you are so smart;)


Honestly, I have better things to do than go back through page after page to pull up examples.  Anyone else reading this thread can easily see them, and other posters have made similar remarks.

I will, however, cite one example.

You've claimed that the general population hates mages, and would support your mission to exterminate them.

Others have shown you in-game evidence that hatred toward mages is not universal, and in fact, some members of the general public have some sympathy for them.  Rather than to concede the point, you have said that you would brainwash them into hating mages, and use hatred, fear, and greed to get them to comply.

IOW, your arguments are not based on the world as it exists, but the world as you would make it.  Purely your invention, and your opinion that it would even be feasible to do so.

On top of that, you liberally sprinkle your posts with hyperbole, phrasing, images, and emoticons intended to mock mages and / or anyone attempting to engage you in discussion.

So I'll join the others in electing to quit feeding you.

#652
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 493 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

Wynne was not part of the Kirkwall circle and the templar's kidnapped her newborn son. kidnapping babies from circle mages seems to be quite normal event.


View it as you like but it still makes sense to move a newborn child from a dangerous place as the Circle


Do you not realize how overly protective a mother can be once she has given birth to a child? Do you honestly believe that for a moment that Wynne would allow her newborn child to be in harms way once she restores her strength from child birth? Besides a newborn baby requires their mothers natrual milk from her breasts to feed her baby so they can get the proper antibodies that they need to fight infections, prevent allergies, and protect against a number of chronic conditions.

By the Templars snatching up newborn babies from circle mages puts the baby at risk for developing health problems due to lack of antibodies thats in the mothers milk. The newborn baby is far better off in the circle under the mothers care rather then to be at a nearby Chantry getting deprived from proper nutrition.

Oh and the Circle wouldn't be as dangerous if the mages were treated with respect.


:lol:
That is what she did

Well to bad life is brutal it is not that they don't turn them into zombie or kill when it is convenient so i don't see problem with that for anyone execpt mages...

#653
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

Wynne was not part of the Kirkwall circle and the templar's kidnapped her newborn son. kidnapping babies from circle mages seems to be quite normal event.


View it as you like but it still makes sense to move a newborn child from a dangerous place as the Circle


Do you not realize how overly protective a mother can be once she has given birth to a child? Do you honestly believe that for a moment that Wynne would allow her newborn child to be in harms way once she restores her strength from child birth? Besides a newborn baby requires their mothers natrual milk from her breasts to feed her baby so they can get the proper antibodies that they need to fight infections, prevent allergies, and protect against a number of chronic conditions.

By the Templars snatching up newborn babies from circle mages puts the baby at risk for developing health problems due to lack of antibodies thats in the mothers milk. The newborn baby is far better off in the circle under the mothers care rather then to be at a nearby Chantry getting deprived from proper nutrition.

Oh and the Circle wouldn't be as dangerous if the mages were treated with respect.


:lol:
That is what she did

Well to bad life is brutal it is not that they don't turn them into zombie or kill when it is convenient so i don't see problem with that for anyone execpt mages...


I don't follow you. What did she do to put her newborn baby in harms way?

#654
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 493 messages

Pasquale1234 wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

Pasquale1234 wrote...
despite being presented with in-game


Point them please if you are so smart;)


Honestly, I have better things to do than go back through page after page to pull up examples.  Anyone else reading this thread can easily see them, and other posters have made similar remarks.

I will, however, cite one example.

You've claimed that the general population hates mages, and would support your mission to exterminate them.

Others have shown you in-game evidence that hatred toward mages is not universal, and in fact, some members of the general public have some sympathy for them.  Rather than to concede the point, you have said that you would brainwash them into hating mages, and use hatred, fear, and greed to get them to comply.

IOW, your arguments are not based on the world as it exists, but the world as you would make it.  Purely your invention, and your opinion that it would even be feasible to do so.

On top of that, you liberally sprinkle your posts with hyperbole, phrasing, images, and emoticons intended to mock mages and / or anyone attempting to engage you in discussion.

So I'll join the others in electing to quit feeding you.


Yes they shown me refugees from ferelden who was desperate did i ignored example nope as i said not everyone hate mages just most do other your evidence is cullen who claims that peoples don't want help templars and to be honest i wouldn't want to do with kirkwall templars much.Pretty much in codex cullen mentions that in other countries that he was peoples gladly help templars.Here have few examples (*) not enough , read asunder , listen peoples in dao (for example those wo spread gossips and their opinion about mages) , wynne states that and provides us example and morrigan have her own despite that she was rarely in communities.  

your arguments are not based on the world as it exists, but the world as you would make it.


you mean part about propaganda that i want place or my arguments as whole?
If first yes you are completely right because that i want to do as i said i know that not every parent want lost their childrens even if mage (but many will do that) so i want increase the number of peoples who will do that pretty much changing world by doing that so you are correct.
IF you mean second that every my argument about that is from world that i want shape thedas then you are wrong and above you have examples if you want more i can give it (and yes they are in game) 

You've claimed that the general population hates mages, and would support your mission to exterminate them.

Yep most population hate mages and fear them and then we have part that is indifferent and don't care and we we have very small amount of peoples who will do something about it but they are so small in numbers they wouldn't be danger.You don't need seek far example i can point you elves and massacres there no one cares...

On top of that, you liberally sprinkle your posts with hyperbole,
phrasing, images, and emoticons intended to mock mages and / or anyone
attempting to engage you in discussion.

it is not that i don't have basics to mock them i only mock particularly and silly things like some solutions on mages problem ,hypocrisy on both sides in-univere and on this forum and well ass pulls are on my list as well.Pretty much i don't see problem if you post something stupid you will be mocked on any forum by most...


*-here little explanation because you can affect that by picking side but you can't change their opinion about mages all you can do to convince them to overthrow meredith not to support mages.

Lord Raijin wrote...



I don't follow you. What did she do to put her newborn baby in harms way?


Well didn't she give him to templars like a cigarette pack (well in old years she regretted:whistle:).If you want future example in asunder you have plenty sor he isn't newborn baby then almost fall (if she didn't turn into anders already) to demon because of that.Do i have mention that ferelden circle was destroyed by abomnations so most
likely rhys would end dead... ultimately that ended for him better than he would end staying with wynne.
 

Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 12 janvier 2014 - 07:49 .


#655
otis0310

otis0310
  • Members
  • 459 messages
Great, I love posts that turn in to two people arguing all the time.

I wish I could lock this.

#656
DPSSOC

DPSSOC
  • Members
  • 3 033 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...
Do you not realize how overly protective a mother can be once she has given birth to a child?

 
Do you not realize that's not a positive trait in a mage?  Magic requires focus, powerful emotions like maternal protectiveness mess with a mage's self control.

Lord Raijin wrote...
Oh and the Circle wouldn't be as dangerous if the mages were treated with respect.


We see a mage light himself on fire.  Another mage is practicing creating a shield against offensive magic.  Numerous hazardous materials are kept on sight.  None of those are a result of mages not being treated with respect.  The practice of magic is dangerous, the Circle is dangerous because of it.

#657
Captain Nimbaud

Captain Nimbaud
  • Members
  • 93 messages
Band them together against a common enemy? Whoever opened up the veil for example.

#658
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...
The newborn baby is far better off in the circle under the mothers care rather then to be at a nearby Chantry getting deprived from proper nutrition.


This is rich.
Now your argument is boiling down to nutritional values.. hahaha

And who sez tehy are desprived of proper nutrition? Ever heard of nursemaids? Given those babies grow up to be productive, healthy adults, I fail to see the issue.

#659
Travie

Travie
  • Members
  • 1 803 messages
Genocide has a nice ring to it. Kinda sounds like an 80s punk band.

#660
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Well didn't she give him to templars like a cigarette pack (well in old years she regretted:whistle:).If you want future example in asunder you have plenty sor he isn't newborn baby then almost fall (if she didn't turn into anders already) to demon because of that.Do i have mention that ferelden circle was destroyed by abomnations so most
likely rhys would end dead... ultimately that ended for him better than he would end staying with wynne.
 



No she did not just willingly hand her newborn son over to the templars.

Alistair: So you... mentioned you had a son? What happened to him?
Wynne: I honestly don't know, Alistair. He was... taken from me. Such births are seldom, as there are ways to prevent it, but it does happen. And any child born to a Circle mage belongs to the Chantry.
Alistair: I... didn't know. I'm sorry.
Wynne: It's all right. It was a long time ago. A very long time ago.
Alistair: Couldn't you do something about it?
Wynne: Do what? I was weak from the birthing process and there were... no, there was nothing I could do.
Alistair: Do you think about him?
Wynne: All the time.

No I do not believe for a moment that someone like Rhys would get himself killed in ferelden Circle during the Abomination fest.

#661
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 493 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Well didn't she give him to templars like a cigarette pack (well in old years she regretted:whistle:).If you want future example in asunder you have plenty sor he isn't newborn baby then almost fall (if she didn't turn into anders already) to demon because of that.Do i have mention that ferelden circle was destroyed by abomnations so most
likely rhys would end dead... ultimately that ended for him better than he would end staying with wynne.
 



No she did not just willingly hand her newborn son over to the templars.

Alistair: So you... mentioned you had a son? What happened to him?
Wynne: I honestly don't know, Alistair. He was... taken from me. Such births are seldom, as there are ways to prevent it, but it does happen. And any child born to a Circle mage belongs to the Chantry.
Alistair: I... didn't know. I'm sorry.
Wynne: It's all right. It was a long time ago. A very long time ago.
Alistair: Couldn't you do something about it?
Wynne: Do what? I was weak from the birthing process and there were... no, there was nothing I could do.
Alistair: Do you think about him?
Wynne: All the time.

No I do not believe for a moment that someone like Rhys would get himself killed in ferelden Circle during the Abomination fest.


Yes all childrens are taken by chantry we know that but how do you know it isn't that she is chantry dog agreeing with their every action until her end...

Besides that was about 10 years before asunder he would died i doubt that the would survive even now damn even mage warden died (probably) in tower if you don't pick him/her.

#662
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Well didn't she give him to templars like a cigarette pack (well in old years she regretted:whistle:).If you want future example in asunder you have plenty sor he isn't newborn baby then almost fall (if she didn't turn into anders already) to demon because of that.Do i have mention that ferelden circle was destroyed by abomnations so most
likely rhys would end dead... ultimately that ended for him better than he would end staying with wynne.
 



No she did not just willingly hand her newborn son over to the templars.

Alistair: So you... mentioned you had a son? What happened to him?
Wynne: I honestly don't know, Alistair. He was... taken from me. Such births are seldom, as there are ways to prevent it, but it does happen. And any child born to a Circle mage belongs to the Chantry.
Alistair: I... didn't know. I'm sorry.
Wynne: It's all right. It was a long time ago. A very long time ago.
Alistair: Couldn't you do something about it?
Wynne: Do what? I was weak from the birthing process and there were... no, there was nothing I could do.
Alistair: Do you think about him?
Wynne: All the time.

No I do not believe for a moment that someone like Rhys would get himself killed in ferelden Circle during the Abomination fest.


Wynne was just too good to rebel. But those who are locked up, denided freedom and unable to protect those who they love can go desperate and do desparate things:

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

Modifié par Rassler, 13 janvier 2014 - 12:55 .


#663
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

DPSSOC wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...
Do you not realize how overly protective a mother can be once she has given birth to a child?

 
Do you not realize that's not a positive trait in a mage?  Magic requires focus, powerful emotions like maternal protectiveness mess with a mage's self control.

Lord Raijin wrote...
Oh and the Circle wouldn't be as dangerous if the mages were treated with respect.


We see a mage light himself on fire.  Another mage is practicing creating a shield against offensive magic.  Numerous hazardous materials are kept on sight.  None of those are a result of mages not being treated with respect.  The practice of magic is dangerous, the Circle is dangerous because of it.


Where does it say that having material instincts effects the mages ability to control her magic and self control? Just because you saw someone lighting himself on fire doesn't mean that every mage is weak. Some are strong while others are weak; some prefer to take the Rite of Tranqulity because they're unable to master their magic talents. Wynne was a strong willed woman. I cannot see her lighting herself on fire just because she has a child.

#664
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 493 messages
DPS is right about mages i would have also forbid mages making relationships they can be easily distracted and fall to demon. 

Still i admire mages who went rebel and did something unlike fools like wynne even if i intend chop every mage nothing personal.

Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 13 janvier 2014 - 01:05 .


#665
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

Rassler wrote...

Lord Raijin wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...
Well didn't she give him to templars like a cigarette pack (well in old years she regretted:whistle:).If you want future example in asunder you have plenty sor he isn't newborn baby then almost fall (if she didn't turn into anders already) to demon because of that.Do i have mention that ferelden circle was destroyed by abomnations so most
likely rhys would end dead... ultimately that ended for him better than he would end staying with wynne.
 



No she did not just willingly hand her newborn son over to the templars.

Alistair: So you... mentioned you had a son? What happened to him?
Wynne: I honestly don't know, Alistair. He was... taken from me. Such births are seldom, as there are ways to prevent it, but it does happen. And any child born to a Circle mage belongs to the Chantry.
Alistair: I... didn't know. I'm sorry.
Wynne: It's all right. It was a long time ago. A very long time ago.
Alistair: Couldn't you do something about it?
Wynne: Do what? I was weak from the birthing process and there were... no, there was nothing I could do.
Alistair: Do you think about him?
Wynne: All the time.

No I do not believe for a moment that someone like Rhys would get himself killed in ferelden Circle during the Abomination fest.


Wynne was just too good to rebel. But those who are locked up, denided freedom and unable to protect those who they love can go desperate and do desparate things:

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image


That is true. It is only in human nature to be protected over the people that you truly care about. This is why the Chantry should have no rights over the mages. They do not belong to them. Slavery is illegal in Ferelden so mages shouldn't be the property of nobody. Hawke's father and Flemeth are examples of mages who can raise a family without chantries assistance.

Everything that happen in Kirkwall was the fault of the Templar's and the Templar Viscount puppet. You essentinally have to kiss the templar's ass just to be elected to be Viscount, and that is just flat out wrong.

#666
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

Rassler wrote...
Wynne was just too good to rebel. But those who are locked up, denided freedom and unable to protect those who they love can go desperate and do desparate things:

That is a complete lie and Anders is just spewing propaganda into the minds of children; which is to be expected considering how he also attempts to convince grieving parents how the young mage he killed was actually killed by Templars.
Did Evelina talk about how the "terrible abuses" she suffered caused her to become an Abomination? No, what lead her to become an Abomination was Anger over the social inequalities of Kirkwall and Desire to give her kids a better life. The Templars had nothing to do with it.
In fact, this perfectly illustrates why it's a good idea to take accidental babies away from mages. Unfortunately, poverty is a fact of life and with mage parents, we have to worry if they won't become an Abomination or simply abuse their powers every time their child is hungry or cold.
Freedom does not equal quality of life and if we have to rely upon mages having perfect, carefree lives in order for them to not become monsters, then mage freedom is incompatible with normal security.

Anders is simply taking advantage of the suffering of others in order to advance his own ideals like the selfish bastard he is.

Modifié par MisterJB, 13 janvier 2014 - 01:22 .


#667
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

DPS is right about mages i would have also forbid mages making relationships they can be easily distracted and fall to demon. 

Still i admire mages who went rebel and did something unlike fools like wynne even if i intend chop every mage nothing personal.


Mages are people and elves just like any other poor peasent living in Ferelden. They have needs to be loved and share love just like anyone else. When you deprive them from this feeling can cause resements and forces mages to take drastic measures, just to be free.

#668
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 493 messages

Lord Raijin wrote...

That is true. It is only in human nature to be protected over the people that you truly care about. This is why the Chantry should have no rights over the mages. They do not belong to them. Slavery is illegal in Ferelden so mages shouldn't be the property of nobody. Hawke's father and Flemeth are examples of mages who can raise a family without chantries assistance.

Everything that happen in Kirkwall was the fault of the Templar's and the Templar Viscount puppet. You essentinally have to kiss the templar's ass just to be elected to be Viscount, and that is just flat out wrong.


It is good that your example involves abusive bi*** that raised stupid evil bi*** as example :lol:
And well malcolm son/daughter did more harm for world than benefit so very bad examples especially with plot armor. Do i have mention that malcolm used blood magic because he had childrens and was emotionally bonded to them so guess what most would do if they children was sick (connor who wanted heal his father).


Lord Raijin wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

DPS is right about mages i would have also forbid mages making relationships they can be easily distracted and fall to demon. 

Still
i admire mages who went rebel and did something unlike fools like wynne
even if i intend chop every mage nothing personal.


Mages
are people and elves just like any other poor peasent living in
Ferelden. They have needs to be loved and share love just like anyone
else. When you deprive them from this feeling can cause resements and
forces mages to take drastic measures, just to be free.


a peoples who can become demon and that is enough relationships make you weak and mages are already fond of falling to demon i would lock them in single cell in prison like aeonar and don't allow exit their cell but that would give me nothing besides cost and mages still would be screwd so i prefer mages killed i will be safe , world as well and mages won't suffer.:whistle:

Modifié par TheKomandorShepard, 13 janvier 2014 - 01:24 .


#669
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

MisterJB wrote...

Rassler wrote...
Wynne was just too good to rebel. But those who are locked up, denided freedom and unable to protect those who they love can go desperate and do desparate things:

That is a complete lie and Anders is just spewing propaganda into the minds of children; which is to be expected considering how he also attempts to convince grieving parents how the young mage he killed was actually killed by Templars.
Did Evelina talk about how the "terrible abuses" she suffered caused her to become an Abomination? No, what lead her to become an Abomination was Anger over the social inequalities of Kirkwall and Desire to give her kids a better life. The Templars had nothing to do with it.
In fact, this perfectly illustrates why it's a good idea to take accidental babies away from mages. Unfortunately, poverty is a fact of life and with mage parents, we have to worry if they won't become an Abomination or simply abuse their powers every time their children is hungry or cold.
Freedom does not equal quality of life and if we have to rely upon mages having perfect, carefree lives in order for them to not become monsters, then mage freedom is incompatible with normal security.

Anders is simply taking advantage of the suffering of others in order to advance his own ideals like the selfish bastard he is.


If mages like Evelina were to be left alone by the Chantries hound dogs and let them live their own lives she would've never became an Abomination in the first place.

#670
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

MisterJB wrote...

Rassler wrote...
Wynne was just too good to rebel. But those who are locked up, denided freedom and unable to protect those who they love can go desperate and do desparate things:

That is a complete lie and Anders is just spewing propaganda into the minds of children; which is to be expected considering how he also attempts to convince grieving parents how the young mage he killed was actually killed by Templars.
Did Evelina talk about how the "terrible abuses" she suffered caused her to become an Abomination? No, what lead her to become an Abomination was Anger over the social inequalities of Kirkwall and Desire to give her kids a better life. The Templars had nothing to do with it.
In fact, this perfectly illustrates why it's a good idea to take accidental babies away from mages. Unfortunately, poverty is a fact of life and with mage parents, we have to worry if they won't become an Abomination or simply abuse their powers every time their children is hungry or cold.
Freedom does not equal quality of life and if we have to rely upon mages having perfect, carefree lives in order for them to not become monsters, then mage freedom is incompatible with normal security.

Anders is simply taking advantage of the suffering of others in order to advance his own ideals like the selfish bastard he is.


Its so obvioys its not even funny. Evelina presented herself to the cricle but they branded her apostate and locked her up, didn't even let her send letters, possibily money to the children. So she escaped and we all know what happened next. It has EVERYTHING to do with the templars and how no one can survive in Kirkwall without licking templar boot. Stop blaming it on poverty, as evidence suggests Evelina was more than capable to feed them before she was locked up.

You simply hate Anders too much, unable to see how grey his actions were. Someone who is more than willing to die for freedom of others can be named anything but selfish.

#671
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 493 messages
excuse that templars attacked her is very poor excuse given that you can be attacked by anyone like bandits (that girl in warehouse is best example) so well pro-mages that excuse doesn't work for anything that fooling yourself.

#672
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

excuse that templars attacked her is very poor excuse given that you can be attacked by anyone like bandits (that girl in warehouse is best example) so well pro-mages that excuse doesn't work for anything that fooling yourself.


The templars don't care if a mage is someone's mother, son, lover etc... They never cared. To them mages are mages, not even people and the "order" dictates that they must be locked up.

Modifié par Rassler, 13 janvier 2014 - 01:46 .


#673
Lord Raijin

Lord Raijin
  • Members
  • 2 777 messages

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

It is good that your example involves abusive bi*** that raised stupid evil bi*** as example :lol:
And well malcolm son/daughter did more harm for world than benefit so very bad examples especially with plot armor. Do i have mention that malcolm used blood magic because he had childrens and was emotionally bonded to them so guess what most would do if they children was sick (connor who wanted heal his father).


So a mage using blood magic as payment to seal in demons for the Grey wardens is considered bad? He used blood magic (He mention that the ritual does not require contact with demonic influences) for good and to help support his family. What's wrong with that?

#674
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

Rassler wrote...
Its so obvioys its not even funny. Evelina presented herself to the cricle but they branded her apostate and locked her up, didn't even let her send letters, possibily money to the children. So she escaped and we all know what happened next. It has EVERYTHING to do with the templars and how no one can survive in Kirkwall without licking templar boot. Stop blaming it on poverty, as evidence suggests Evelina was more than capable to feed them before she was locked up.

"You're fereldan, like us. But you feast on sweetmeats while your people starve in the Undercity. I spit on you traitor, and the pathetic Templars that sent you. Kirkwall should be mine, then my children would have a whole city to play in."

That is what she says, she only mentions the Templars in a generic fashion. What lead her to become an Abomination were simple facts of life like poverty because living is bloody hard. It was not that she was being kept from her kids and needed power; she had already escaped. It was simply anger, resentment, jealousy and desperation caused by watching people like Hawke living in mansions while her kids were beggars.

And this is why mages can't be trusted with freedom; life presents hardships that have nothing to do with the Templars and there is always the chances mages will give in to temptation and become monsters like what happened with Evelina.
If a mage family suddenly ends up on the streets because of the same reasons that have placed others there? Should we worry they'll use mind control to gain money? Become Abominations?

You simply hate Anders too much, unable to see how grey his actions were. Someone who is more than willing to die for freedom of others can be named anything but selfish.

Anders is selfish. You support his actions; ok, I couldn't care less; I can see why some people would support them. But Anders is selfish.
Anders was not leading a group of people that agreed with him and wanted the same he did; he was a lone rebel who felt things had to change. And because of that, he selected the Circle of Kirkwall to become unwilling martyrs.

What if the mages would rather live in the Circle that be placed in a fight or die situation?
It didn't matter to him, things had to change.

What if the Templars would rather things stay as they are and not be order to Annul the Circle?
It didn't matter to him, things had to change.

What if the civilians did not wish to be caught in the crossfire?
It didn't matter, things had to change.

Ultimately, Anders did what he did because HE felt that the world couldn't stay as it was; HE thought he knew better than everyone how the world should and HE would drag everyone into this new world if he had to. And that is what makes him selfish because his actions were committed because of how HE felt, not because of what OTHERS wanted.
A person can be selfish even if their actions are done for the supposed benefit of others.

A truly selfless person would either gain the support of the people he claimed to wish to help or he would respect their wishes to remain in the Circle. He might believe they were being foolish and denying themselves a worthier life but a selfless person would put his feelings aside and do what others wanted for themselves, not what he thought they should want for themselves.

And that is why, ultimately, Anders is a selfish person. His cause may even be worthy to many; not to me; but that doesn't change the fact Anders is selfish.

Modifié par MisterJB, 13 janvier 2014 - 01:50 .


#675
TheKomandorShepard

TheKomandorShepard
  • Members
  • 8 493 messages

Rassler wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

excuse that templars attacked her is very poor excuse given that you can be attacked by anyone like bandits (that girl in warehouse is best example) so well pro-mages that excuse doesn't work for anything that fooling yourself.


The templars don't care if a mage is someone's mother, son, lover etc... They never cared. To them mages are mages, not even people and the "order" dictates that they must be locked up.


If they want be effective they need see mage as mage that same do law enforcers they look on criminal like criminal not son , mother or lover. On other hand not that templars are doing good job anyway that means their methods are too lax toward mages.About order dictates yeah i think that is ridiculus but convenient for non-mages had fanatics protecting them from mages.

Lord Raijin wrote...

TheKomandorShepard wrote...

It is good that your example involves abusive bi*** that raised stupid evil bi*** as example [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]
And
well malcolm son/daughter did more harm for world than benefit so very
bad examples especially with plot armor. Do i have mention that malcolm
used blood magic because he had childrens and was emotionally bonded to
them so guess what most would do if they children was sick (connor who
wanted heal his father).



So a mage using blood magic as payment to seal in demons for the Grey wardens is considered bad? He used blood magic (He mention that the ritual does not require contact with demonic influences) for good and to help support his family. What's wrong with that?




My point is that even religious nut like malcolm did that because he was emotionally blackmailed because of his bond so that one reason why mages should be forbidden to any relationship if you want try control them.And how demons weren't involved guy sealed 4 pride demons for seals and 4 another demons in prison.