Aller au contenu

Photo

Battle of Ostagar,Was Loghain retreat wise or not ? DEBATE


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
308 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

In Exile wrote...

The initial battleplan was really stupid. But even if Loghain had the best intentions at heart, retreat was the right option. It was his incompetence in part that led to half the army dying, but once he was in that situation, he made the right choice and saved as much of the army as he could.

What makes Loghain an obvious traitor is every single thing that he does afterward.


:P

I obviously disagree about the man being a traitor.

#102
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 774 messages

Master Warder Z wrote...

Loghain was wise to pull back and not fight a losing battle; He saved the majority of the Army because of his actions and while perhaps his duty was to his king he also had a duty to his Nation to protect it from both the threat of foreign incursion and the darkspawn.

Preserving the Nation's Military Strength at the cost of its king and the gray wardens was a costly move but a needed one never the less.


Reminds me of A Song of Ice and Fire's Jaime Lannister's speech about vows and how they are impossible to keep without breaking another.

Vows

Hell of a performance of it in Game of Thrones

Modifié par LPPrince, 08 janvier 2014 - 12:27 .


#103
Axdinosaurx

Axdinosaurx
  • Members
  • 136 messages

Angrywolves wrote...

"That can mean many things. I still maintain that we're supposed to make our own truth about this. There is no right truth and wrong truth.
'

Truer words have never been spoke.

The players that like Loghain, want him to be in DAI as a warden or something will says he had no choice but to retreat.

Players who hate Loghain, I am among those, say he betrayed Ferelden and his king.

I kill him every single time, but I think he made the right call retreating. The boy king was a fool and died because of that.

#104
Veruin

Veruin
  • Members
  • 1 237 messages

Aaleel wrote...

Even if one thinks the decision at Ostagar was right how does one defend the actions afterwards?  Attempted assassination, slave trading, blaming the Wardens, etc.  He died in every on of my countless playthroughs for this not the Ostagar :lol:


I've never seen anyone defend those.  Ostagar is about the only thing people defend.

#105
ISpeakTheTruth

ISpeakTheTruth
  • Members
  • 1 642 messages

bEVEsthda wrote...

ISpeakTheTruth wrote...

AlanC9 wrote...
This would make a lot more sense if Loghain had actually told the king that he would be in danger of losing the battle if he fought it before the Redcliffe forces came up. Did he?


Duncan certainly told him directly to his face and he said no. Besides are you trying to tell me that Calin needed to be told that fighting without waiting for reinforcements against an enemy that historically has required multiple nations in order to defeat is dangerous? Calin thought he was playing a game, he was going to be fighting basically all alone with one Grey Warden to 'Stop the Blight here."

Even when the leader of the Grey Wardens tells him to wait for back up he says no. Calin was a fool and got all of his men and woman killed for no reason.


Whaddaya mean "even"?  Duncan was the only one that told him. Yes, Calin was a fool. He had always been a fool. And who knows this? Who has always known this? And who stands there, silent, watching? Loghain was supposed to guide Calin. That was one of his two main jobs. Maybe he did "guide" Calin?

Any truth works. You'll not find any straight, clear evidence for any interpretation.


"Even" means that both Duncan and Loghain said that fighting the Darkspawn with no backup of any kind was foolish. If you talk to Loghain at his tent he says Calin was dead set on this fight no matter what anyone said. Loghain tried to reason with Calin but it didn't happen. Loghain tries to tell Calin not to be in the fight at all but to stay back if he wants the fight to happen so badly.

The truth is he tried to convince Calin not to commit to the battle, then he tried to convince him not to be in the fight himself, then once Calin refused every offer of reason Loghain chose not to sacrifice his entire army in a battle he could never win. People who wanted Loghain to stay are people who wanted him and his soilders to die for absolutely nothing, that is the truth because nothing Loghain did could have changed what happened. 

#106
Mike3207

Mike3207
  • Members
  • 1 715 messages
Yes. Duncan himself said that the darkspawn looked to outnumber the human forces before Ostagar, and even if the signal had been on time the best that might have been hoped for was a stalemate.

The signal was late, and Loghain would have destroyed the army if he had made that charge. He made the right decision to withdraw.

#107
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 774 messages
Anyway folks, ignore everything not involving Ostagar. Leave those at the door.

This is about Ostagar itself. Some things you can reach for(the turning down of Orlesian aid occurred at Ostagar, thus that can be followed to events post-Ostagar) but ignore the completely irrelevant events.

Modifié par LPPrince, 08 janvier 2014 - 12:35 .


#108
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

LPPrince wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

Loghain was wise to pull back and not fight a losing battle; He saved the majority of the Army because of his actions and while perhaps his duty was to his king he also had a duty to his Nation to protect it from both the threat of foreign incursion and the darkspawn.

Preserving the Nation's Military Strength at the cost of its king and the gray wardens was a costly move but a needed one never the less.


Reminds me of A Song of Ice and Fire's Jaime Lannister's speech about vows and how they are impossible to keep without breaking another.

Vows

Hell of a performance of it in Game of Thrones


Good Comparsion i think.

Both men are King Slayers in one way or another i suppose.

The Characters do at least have that in common.

:/  Except that Loghain never turned his blade against his Liege he saved their military at the cost of his King, Wynne can gripe and moan all she wishes but that battle was lost the moment the signal was delayed.

Oh speaking of Blades and Loghain i just finished the duel at the Landsmeet and once again i am amazed at how well some one working with a tier one iron sword can do against the Warden who is packing the best equipment in game by this point.

Sort of scary; Still the character was a bit scaled down after the boss battle and that annoyed me.

#109
Veruin

Veruin
  • Members
  • 1 237 messages

ISpeakTheTruth wrote...
The truth is he tried to convince Calin not to commit to the battle, then he tried to convince him not to be in the fight himself, then once Calin refused every offer of reason Loghain chose not to sacrifice his entire army in a battle he could never win. People who wanted Loghain to stay are people who wanted him and his soilders to die for absolutely nothing, that is the truth because nothing Loghain did could have changed what happened. 


The funny part is that Loghain can't force him out either.  Since anytime he did Cailan pulled the "I'm the king, so shut up." card.

#110
Banxey

Banxey
  • Members
  • 1 306 messages

Angrywolves wrote...

Some players seem to think numbers trump all else and because of numbers the darkspawn would have won and that Loghain was wise to retreat.
Loghain didn't retreat because he was outnumbered, he retreated because he wanted Cailen dead.

History is full of cases where the smaller military force beat a larger force.


Exactly. Loghain was supposed to be a master tactician. If I remember correctly, he earned his place beside Maric for pulling off things that were supposed to be impossible in The Stolen Throne. Even though Cailan was a bit on the derpy side, I doubt he'd have planned the battle without Loghain, even if Loghain did so begrudgingly.

As far as Loghain deciding to quit the field in that moment, and not planning it beforehand, he had already started to manoeuvre into position to take power from Cailan when he let Howe massacre the Couslands. He was working to put Howe into a position where Howe would have the authority to back him. The only two Teryns in Ferelden at that time were Bryce Cousland and Loghain himself, and in Ferelden noble hierarchy they're second to royalty.

As far as Cailan betraying Ferelden by allying with Orlais, we don't really know enough about Celene or her motivations other than she has been good for her country. It's not as though Cailan was betraying Ferelden to the Emporer who conquered it.

And of course, Flemeth told Maric that Loghain would betray him. And I think she is a pretty good judge of character.

With all that said, I think they all probably would have died anyway. :-p

#111
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 774 messages
I wouldn't call Loghain a king slayer.

Jaime Lannister actually did physically kill King Aerys. Done in order to save the lives of the city he swore to protect- King's Landing. Because he also swore an oath to serve King Aerys as Kingsguard, everyone afterward never cared to hear his reasoning and thus deemed him "The Kingslayer".

Loghain didn't physically kill King Cailan. He actively did everything he could to convince Cailan to not throw his life away in battle just so he could have songs sung about him. Cailan went ahead with it anyway, and got himself in a no-win situation. Loghain chose to keep his oath to the people rather than his oath to his king, and thus saved his forces to fight another day, rather than throwing them away in a mad dash to save one man.

Similar in that they both chose the many over the one, and similar in that they were both seen in a poor light afterward for their choice, but I would not call Loghain a king slayer.

Modifié par LPPrince, 08 janvier 2014 - 12:44 .


#112
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 774 messages

Banxey2 wrote...

he had already started to manoeuvre into position to take power from Cailan when he let Howe massacre the Couslands.


False. Gaider said Loghain had no foreknowledge of what Howe planned to do at Highever, and was forced to ally with him because of the power Howe had available at the time. Had Loghain not sided with Howe, everyone would be in even more trouble. I'm not even sure Loghain liked Howe, but I never thought to ask Mr. Gaider about that.

#113
Veruin

Veruin
  • Members
  • 1 237 messages

Banxey2 wrote...
snip


Howe is in control of Northern Fereldan and can put a complete stop to trade.  He didn't have much choice but to ally with him.  Howe assaulted the Couslands on his own, as he saw them getting glory that he thought he deserved.

We know Cailan is a puppet monarch.  He's only there for the title and boons.  Namely the wealth, food, and the ability to do whatever he wants.  If he married Celene, she could control Fereldan through diplomacy, without the harsh penalties of calling a war.

#114
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

Banxey2 wrote...

Angrywolves wrote...

Some players seem to think numbers trump all else and because of numbers the darkspawn would have won and that Loghain was wise to retreat.
Loghain didn't retreat because he was outnumbered, he retreated because he wanted Cailen dead.

History is full of cases where the smaller military force beat a larger force.


Exactly. Loghain was supposed to be a master tactician. If I remember correctly, he earned his place beside Maric for pulling off things that were supposed to be impossible in The Stolen Throne. Even though Cailan was a bit on the derpy side, I doubt he'd have planned the battle without Loghain, even if Loghain did so begrudgingly.

As far as Loghain deciding to quit the field in that moment, and not planning it beforehand, he had already started to manoeuvre into position to take power from Cailan when he let Howe massacre the Couslands. He was working to put Howe into a position where Howe would have the authority to back him. The only two Teryns in Ferelden at that time were Bryce Cousland and Loghain himself, and in Ferelden noble hierarchy they're second to royalty.

As far as Cailan betraying Ferelden by allying with Orlais, we don't really know enough about Celene or her motivations other than she has been good for her country. It's not as though Cailan was betraying Ferelden to the Emporer who conquered it.

And of course, Flemeth told Maric that Loghain would betray him. And I think she is a pretty good judge of character.

With all that said, I think they all probably would have died anyway. :-p


...If you Acknowledge Loghain was at least tactically savy to withdraw at the advance of the Horde then why do you consider a tactically valid move Betryayal?

Would it have been better to have the Army die along with their king? 

To have Loghain leap into the fray himself and give up his life for no purpose?

I am just curious here because i personally think Flemeth was dead wrong about Loghain considering every move he had made was for the betterment of his Nation; Sometimes he did horrible things to get things done but things happened because of it.

His actions after ostagar which i will not debate in this posts aside. His "Betrayal of Maric" was basically him slapping him and telling him to grow a pair and be a King. Spies, Repentant or not are still spies and even in our reality espianoge generally carries a death penalty with it.

So in essence Thedas isn't even "culturally" Backwards for that practice.

#115
General TSAR

General TSAR
  • Members
  • 4 383 messages
Calian's army were not Fins in strong entrenched postions going up against the Brain-dead Red Army in Frozen Scandinavia.

They were either rookies or seasoned troops but had little knowledge of their enemy going up against the Darkspawn in an open field in temperate conditions at night in the rain.

Calian had his army in a boxed valley and he ordered them to charge at the horde of Darkspawn who were extending for miles judging by the torches. 

The army was blocked on all sides and Ostagar's defensibility offered no help to them being stuck in the valley. 

Modifié par General TSAR, 08 janvier 2014 - 01:06 .


#116
Banxey

Banxey
  • Members
  • 1 306 messages

LPPrince wrote...

Banxey2 wrote...

he had already started to manoeuvre into position to take power from Cailan when he let Howe massacre the Couslands.


False. Gaider said Loghain had no foreknowledge of what Howe planned to do at Highever, and was forced to ally with him because of the power Howe had available at the time. Had Loghain not sided with Howe, everyone would be in even more trouble. I'm not even sure Loghain liked Howe, but I never thought to ask Mr. Gaider about that.


Well I never knew that. But what power did Howe really have other than his personal army? I suppose if Howe knew Loghain was scheming, he could use that against him. 

#117
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 774 messages
Howe at the time had the newly conquered Highever, had Amaranthine, through Amaranthine had access to the sea and to trade, had wealth, had his own army, etc etc

I'm sure I'm forgetting some, but yeah. Loghain didn't have a choice. He basically had to let Howe tag along unless he wanted Ferelden split up, which he didn't want- it happened anyway, but we know that he was hoping for Ferelden to be united under one banner.

#118
Veruin

Veruin
  • Members
  • 1 237 messages

Banxey2 wrote..

Well I never knew that. But what power did Howe really have other than his personal army? I suppose if Howe knew Loghain was scheming, he could use that against him. 


Veruin wrote...
Howe is in control of Northern Fereldan and can put a complete stop to trade.  He didn't have much choice but to ally with him.  Howe assaulted the Couslands on his own, as he saw them getting glory that he thought he deserved.



#119
Androme

Androme
  • Members
  • 757 messages

bEVEsthda wrote...

Androme wrote...
Copied from Dragon Age Wiki:
''Born into occupied Ferelden, Loghain Mac Tir[/b] and King Maric Theirin drove out the Orlesian Empire more than thirty years before the events of the Fifth Blight.Loghain was raised to the position Teyrn of Gwaren for his service to King Maric. To Ferelden, he represents ideals of hard work and independence. After King Maric was lost at sea, Loghain became responsible for defending Ferelden and guiding his naïve and inexperienced son-in-law, King Cailan Theirin.''

He is experienced, he is cold and calculating, he is strong and cunning.


But he is not wise.


So the entire Ferelden army dying at Ostagar would've been the wiser decision?

Okay bro.

#120
Zu Long

Zu Long
  • Members
  • 1 561 messages
I find people who defend Loghain's actions at Ostagar misinterpret a number of factors about the battle. The following factors are critical to coming to a correct conclusion about Loghain's actions-

1. Loghain couldn't see the battle from where he was. - People claim Loghain saw the odds and decided the battle couldn't be won. But the whole point of using the tower as a signal in the first place was that the ambush force couldn't see what was happening. We know the leadership of Ferelden was pessimistic about their chances at Ostagar behind closed doors, but Loghain had NO IDEA what the tactical situation of the battle was when he made the call to retreat.

2. Loghain is the only reason the Ferelden soldiers are so horribly outnumbered in the first place.
It is Loghain who insisted Orlais not be allowed to become involved despite the fact the Ferelden troops were outmatched. While understandable based on his prior experiences with Orlais, if we consider tactics refusing aid doomed the Army at Ostagar.

3. In the face of a Blight, the only tactically relevant force is the Grey Wardens. Even IF the above two weren't true, the fact is leaving Ostagar rather than running to the aid of the Ferelden forces was tactically the wrong move. As had been demonstrated no less than FOUR times in Thedas' history, only a Grey Warden can end a blight. Loghain knew this, and the sheer number of darkspawn involved showed that this was, in fact, a Blight. That being the case, the Grey Wardens are the ONLY force that matters. The other soldiers are, at the end of the day, meatshields and nothing more. Springing the ambush and saving at least SOME of the Grey Wardens so that they could fight another day was the tactically correct choice. Without the Wardens, you're doomed no matter how many soldiers you have.

In summation, Loghain failed as a tactician, a servant to his king, and as a father to his son in law at Ostagar. He was completely blinded by his fear and hatred of Orlais. Such a monumental blunder and betrayal, by itself, would have mandated his execution. His further actions after seizing power only confirm how richly he deserved his fate.

Modifié par Zu Long, 08 janvier 2014 - 01:07 .


#121
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 279 messages

Zu Long wrote...

I find people who defend Loghain's actions at Ostagar misinterpret a number of factors about the battle. The following factors are critical to coming to a correct conclusion about Loghain's actions-

1. Loghain couldn't see the battle from where he was. - People claim Loghain saw the odds and decided the battle couldn't be won. But the whole point of using the tower as a signal in the first place was that the ambush force couldn't see what was happening. We know the leadership of Ferelden was pessimistic about their chances at Ostagar behind closed doors, but Loghain had NO IDEA what the tactical situation of the battle was when he made the call to retreat.

2. Loghain is the only reason the Ferelden soldiers are so horribly outnumbered in the first place.
It is Loghain who insisted Orlais not be allowed to become involved despite the fact the Ferelden troops were outmatched. While understandable based on his prior experiences with Orlais, if we consider tactics refusing aid doomed the Army at Ostagar.

3. In the face of a Blight, the only tactically relevant force is the Grey Wardens. Even IF the above two weren't true, the fact is leaving Ostagar rather than running to the aid of the Ferelden forces was tactically the wrong move. As had been demonstrated no less than FOUR times in Thedas' history, only a Grey Warden can end a blight. Loghain knew this, and the sheer number of darkspawn involved showed that this was, in fact, a Blight. That being the case, the Grey Wardens are the ONLY force that matters. The other soldiers are, at the end of the day, meatshields and nothing more. Springing the ambush and saving at least SOME of the Grey Wardens so that they could fight another day was the tactically correct choice. Without the Wardens, you're doomed no matter how many soldiers you have.

In summation, Loghain failed as a tactician, a servant to his king, and as a father to his son in law at Ostagar. He was completely blinded by his fear and hatred of Orlais. Such a monumental blunder and betrayal, by itself, would have mandated his execution. His further actions after seizing power only confirm how richly he deserved his fate.

Too bad he survived and joined the Grey Wardens :wizard:

Modifié par Steelcan, 08 janvier 2014 - 01:09 .


#122
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 279 messages

LPPrince wrote...

Master Warder Z wrote...

Loghain was wise to pull back and not fight a losing battle; He saved the majority of the Army because of his actions and while perhaps his duty was to his king he also had a duty to his Nation to protect it from both the threat of foreign incursion and the darkspawn.

Preserving the Nation's Military Strength at the cost of its king and the gray wardens was a costly move but a needed one never the less.


Reminds me of A Song of Ice and Fire's Jaime Lannister's speech about vows and how they are impossible to keep without breaking another.

Vows

Hell of a performance of it in Game of Thrones

I don't begrudge the decision to either one

One king was insane and a clear danger to the entire realm.  Slitting his throat was Jaime's finest move. 

The other was a bumbling moron who followed David's rule of combat, brave and heroic > sound strategy

#123
Banxey

Banxey
  • Members
  • 1 306 messages

Veruin wrote...

Banxey2 wrote...
snip


Howe is in control of Northern Fereldan and can put a complete stop to trade.  He didn't have much choice but to ally with him.  Howe assaulted the Couslands on his own, as he saw them getting glory that he thought he deserved.

We know Cailan is a puppet monarch.  He's only there for the title and boons.  Namely the wealth, food, and the ability to do whatever he wants.  If he married Celene, she could control Fereldan through diplomacy, without the harsh penalties of calling a war.


Yeah, Howe was in control of Northern Ferelden, but could he hold it with his own forces. Loghain probably saw fighting this as pointless because it would just fracture his already weakened forces, but it made no difference because the forces were fractured when the Banns saw Loghain as a userper. So he seems to have made some fairly flawed assumptions about just how much people felt Orlais was a threat.

I don't see how Celene ruling Ferelden in that way until a suitable child with Therin blood came of age would necessarily be a bad thing. Unless something comes out in the future that shows Celene to be significantly more evil than I currently view her.

Master Warder Z wrote...

Banxey2 wrote...

Exactly. Loghain was supposed to be a master tactician. If I remember correctly, he earned his place beside Maric for pulling off things that were supposed to be impossible in The Stolen Throne. Even though Cailan was a bit on the derpy side, I doubt he'd have planned the battle without Loghain, even if Loghain did so begrudgingly. 

As far as Loghain deciding to quit the field in that moment, and not planning it beforehand, he had already started to manoeuvre into position to take power from Cailan when he let Howe massacre the Couslands. He was working to put Howe into a position where Howe would have the authority to back him. The only two Teryns in Ferelden at that time were Bryce Cousland and Loghain himself, and in Ferelden noble hierarchy they're second to royalty.

As far as Cailan betraying Ferelden by allying with Orlais, we don't really know enough about Celene or her motivations other than she has been good for her country. It's not as though Cailan was betraying Ferelden to the Emporer who conquered it.

And of course, Flemeth told Maric that Loghain would betray him. And I think she is a pretty good judge of character. 

With all that said, I think they all probably would have died anyway. :-p


...If you Acknowledge Loghain was at least tactically savy to withdraw at the advance of the Horde then why do you consider a tactically valid move Betryayal?


Because the betrayal isn't Loghain's tactics, it's his motives. I think given that situation, they all probably would have died (though as Angrywolves pointed out it's not an impossible situation). But if his motivations were to stop Orlais, and not the blight (which nobody seemed to believe was real) then I have my doubts his actions were as noble as he claims. My take on it is that he saw Cailan as foolish, and he turned his stupidity into an opportunity. Which in my book, is a betrayal. 


Would it have been better to have the Army die along with their king? To have Loghain leap into the fray himself and give up his life for no purpose?


I think it again depends on his motivations. I would like to know if Loghain went along with a bad plan because it was the only plan, or if he could have put together a better plan. 



His actions after ostagar which i will not debate in this posts aside. His "Betrayal of Maric" was basically him slapping him and telling him to grow a pair and be a King. Spies, Repentant or not are still spies and even in our reality espianoge generally carries a death penalty with it.


While I agree that Katriel was responsible for people dying and should have died, I think Loghain was wrong not to tell Maric the entire truth. He thought he made him a better king by lying to him. But did he? He stole the opportunity from Maric to do the right thing for his country because he didn't believe in Maric.

Modifié par Banxey2, 08 janvier 2014 - 01:17 .


#124
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

Zu Long wrote...

I find people who defend Loghain's actions at Ostagar misinterpret a number of factors about the battle. The following factors are critical to coming to a correct conclusion about Loghain's actions-

1. Loghain couldn't see the battle from where he was. - People claim Loghain saw the odds and decided the battle couldn't be one. But the whole point of using the tower as a signal in the first place was that the ambush force couldn't see what was happening. We know the leadership of Ferelden was pessimistic about their chances at Ostagar behind closed doors, but Loghain had NO IDEA what the tactical situation of the battle was when he made the call to retreat.

2. Loghain is the only reason the Ferelden soldiers are so horribly outnumbered in the first place.
It is Loghain who insisted Orlais not be allowed to become involved despite the fact the Ferelden troops were outmatched. While understandable based on his prior experiences with Orlais, if we consider tactics refusing aid doomed the Army at Ostagar.

3. In the face of a Blight, the only tactically relevant force is the Grey Wardens. Even IF the above two weren't true, the fact is leaving Ostagar rather than running to the aid of the Ferelden forces was tactically the wrong move. As had been demonstrated no less than FOUR times in Thedas' history, only a Grey Warden can end a blight. Loghain knew this, and the sheer number of darkspawn involved showed that this was, in fact, a Blight. That being the case, the Grey Wardens are the ONLY force that matters. The other soldiers are, at the end of the day, meatshields and nothing more. Springing the ambush and saving at least SOME of the Grey Wardens so that they could fight another day was the tactically correct choice. Without the Wardens, you're doomed no matter how many soldiers you have.

In summation, Loghain failed as a tactician, a servant to his king, and as a father to his son in law at Ostagar. He was completely blinded by his fear and hatred of Orlais. Such a monumental blunder and betrayal, by itself, would have mandated his execution. His further actions after seizing power only confirm how richly he deserved his fate.


Responses 

1. Loghain spent a good deal prior to the main skirmish at Ostogar scouting the wilds to make tactical assessments about Darkspawn Progress and Numbers but from in game events we can see how often that worked; He was working with an incomplete picture of the enemies numbers, capabilities and make up at best. Thus a simple Pincer feint was likely the best he could do given that the battlefield as many have already stated was a box canyon with only a single entrance and exit.

2. Past expreince in the war with Orlais aside the battle would have been fought and lost regardless of his acceptance of their aid considering that they only were arriving at the borders of Fereldan weeks after the battle occured. After all as Alistair so sagely put "The Nearest Orlaisian City is weeks away." 

3. Considering that evidence at this point contricted your earlier claim of it being a blight considering there was no indication of an Arch Demon at this point it could be understandable to not buy into a blight considering a good majority of people aren't plagued with dreams of the Arch Demon and cannot sense Darkspawn intent.

Furthermore there are far more Wardens in the world then those that came to Fereldan from Orlais and elsewhere. Yes Fereldan likely would have fallen had it not been for the actions of the Gray Wardens but that aside, It took the Military to breach the siege of Denerim and futhermore considering that as blight advanced and Nations wrote off the country, What was Loghain to do?

Blindly accept the aid of those who might take advantage of his Nation's Weakeness? Espeically their Neighbors to the West that did so before? 

Loghain as i have said it many times wasn't working with the best information he could have at the moment, and in part that is due to Gray Warden Secercy and Mystism. From his perspective he outlined what he likely thought the only method of salvaging the battle when it was clear despite him not having a clear picture of enemy numbers and capabilities that they were in fact heavily outnumbered.

In closing.

I think Loghain did the best he could with the mess he was dumped into and better then most.

#125
Malanek

Malanek
  • Members
  • 7 838 messages
I think the story would have been much, much, better if Loghain had been able to see the battle and made the decision to retreat. It could have been ambiguous as to whether he was betraying Cailan or not. As it stood, no it wasn't wise. He made the commitment to fight and then didn't so Cailan would die. He couldn't see what was happening, it wasn't strategical.