Working for minimum wage in America must be a dreadful experience
#26
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 01:46
#27
Guest_mikeucrazy_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 01:48
Guest_mikeucrazy_*
Foxxie x Lightning wrote...
Since I spent all my earnings on crack.
You need a Pimp
#28
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 01:52
#29
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 01:58
I know, I was surprised I made money too.
#30
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 01:59
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
MassivelyEffective0730 wrote...
I've never understood why more people didn't turn to the military. Sure it's a commitment, but you do learn some very valuable skills there, especially if you go into the right field. Get into intelligence, get a security clearance, and you can make doors open for yourself very fast. Plus, you get money for college.
A couple of my military friends are saying that there are less deployments, and that it's more difficult to get in now.
#31
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:10
It's a great system. To get one of those degrees from a top school you need money. Which you don't have if you're poor. So you get a job to pay for it...except you don't have one of those degrees so you have to do one of those crap soul sucking jobs or sell your body to rich people, none of which is helping your self esteem and improving your odds of getting that degree. On the other hand, if you're born wealthy you don't even need a degree to get those great jobs, Daddy's network will hook you up. And if you screw up running on of those great jobs? Expect a golden parachute. Meanwhile the middle class is subsidising the upper class by paying the wages of their lower class employees because tipping is an acceptable practise, while paying a real wage is communism. But bailing out millionaires and banks when they screw up is not a handout, it's just good policy. Yeah, Capitalism!bmwcrazy wrote...
Here in the real world, it is all about the competition. Out of hundreds of resumes we get, of course we are picking out the people with bachelor's and master's degrees from the top schools and also with the most experience.
#32
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:14
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
metatheurgist wrote...
It's a great system. To get one of those degrees from a top school you need money. Which you don't have if you're poor. So you get a job to pay for it...except you don't have one of those degrees so you have to do one of those crap soul sucking jobs or sell your body to rich people, none of which is helping your self esteem and improving your odds of getting that degree. On the other hand, if you're born wealthy you don't even need a degree to get those great jobs, Daddy's network will hook you up. And if you screw up running on of those great jobs? Expect a golden parachute. Meanwhile the middle class is subsidising the upper class by paying the wages of their lower class employees because tipping is an acceptable practise, while paying a real wage is communism. But bailing out millionaires and banks when they screw up is not a handout, it's just good policy. Yeah, Capitalism!bmwcrazy wrote...
Here in the real world, it is all about the competition. Out of hundreds of resumes we get, of course we are picking out the people with bachelor's and master's degrees from the top schools and also with the most experience.
Or if you're poor, you can use one of the plentiful financial aid options while working a part time job to help pay it off. Then you can get a degree, get paid, and you don't have to feel bitter about other people getting theirs.
#33
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:29
The Mad Hanar wrote...
Or if you're poor, you can use one of the plentiful financial aid options while working a part time job to help pay it off. Then you can get a degree, get paid, and you don't have to feel bitter about other people getting theirs.
Or scholarships.
#34
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:41
bmwcrazy wrote...
RedArmyShogun wrote...
And as I pointed out thats not economically possible. Plus in case you did not notice as Western Europe has learned to its demise to an extent the service economy does NOT work. You must have a robust field of industries and professions. However the Min Wage should be a benchmark of the bare lowest for a citizen to make ends meet. But the problem isn't raising it.
Its stoping Corru...oh sorry "compitition" that makes the currencies around the world as worthless as they now are. But thats Dirty Commie Talk.
You're very worked up over this.
Personally, I'm also against raising the minimum wage. But that's evil capitalist pig talk, amirite?
However, I think you've now gone off topic since you've brought up service economy.
Any business owner that's against raising the minimum wage really just doesn't want to be forced to pay people a living wage, b/c that would cut into the profits. That's really what it comes down to.
#35
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:43
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
#36
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:45
#37
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:46
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
I personally dislike the idea of scholarships--seems a little too government-centric to me--but I'll be honest an academic scholarship shuts that right up.
In my opinion, however, the worst off are the kids born into terrible situations, often with three or four other siblings, only one parent figure, that parent figure not even qualifying as a "parent figure," these kids growing up in a dog-eat-dog world that makes each day a struggle to seem "tough" and makes academics seem like a weak way--that leaves them with no option but to start the sh*tty cycle all over again when they knock up/get knocked up by someone at 16.
These are kids who are, in the truest sense of the words, a victim of their circumstances. They are born and bred with no incentive for success, and as a result they never have success.
#38
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:46
And people ask why total socialism doesn't work.
Modifié par Br3ad, 11 janvier 2014 - 02:47 .
#39
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:47
Would increasing the minimum wage by a large amount really solve anything? If they paid minimum wage workers 7-8$ and then increased it to 10-12 dollars, wouldn't the employees who were paid 10-12 because of education/experience/promotion feel cheapened? Wouldn't you need to increase their wages to compensate for the new minimum wage?
Suddenly across the board you're seeing an increase of wages, something which doesn't fix the initial problem because that money has to come from something and you'll just see a price hike.
If they don't increase the wage for those being paid 10-12 dollars, why should they aspire for anything more than being the bare minimum if the guy next to him who was hired yesterday with no experience is being paid the same?
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 11 janvier 2014 - 02:48 .
#40
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:48
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Ravensword wrote...
Any business owner that's against raising the minimum wage really just doesn't want to be forced to pay people a living wage, b/c that would cut into the profits. That's really what it comes down to.
As much as I recognize your point--that's their job. YOUR job is not to take a pay cut so your employer can stay in business, just like it's not your employer's job to give you more money than you'll take. "Morals" or perhaps ethics aren't really a consideration.
#41
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:51
EntropicAngel wrote...
Ravensword wrote...
Any business owner that's against raising the minimum wage really just doesn't want to be forced to pay people a living wage, b/c that would cut into the profits. That's really what it comes down to.
As much as I recognize your point--that's their job. YOUR job is not to take a pay cut so your employer can stay in business, just like it's not your employer's job to give you more money than you'll take. "Morals" or perhaps ethics aren't really a consideration.
Well, it becomes an issue when you're a large corporation that pays their full-time staff $7.25 an hour like McDonald's does. They make huge profits and can easily pay their full-time employees twice as much as they do now.
#42
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:52
#43
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:55
Not just that, but raising the minimum wage will also have another effect. Yes, the quality of living for the employed will increase. However, jobs will decrease. Minimum wage causes the total amount of jobs to go down. We need a balance between dirt poor billions of workers, and Scrouge McDuck tens of workers(I'm talking extremes here).Dave of Canada wrote...
My own incomprehension of the situation will come across loud and clear in this post, just to inform you ahead.
Would increasing the minimum wage by a large amount really solve anything? If they paid minimum wage workers 7-8$ and then increased it to 10-12 dollars, wouldn't the employees who were paid 10-12 because of education/experience/promotion feel cheapened? Wouldn't you need to increase their wages to compensate for the new minimum wage?
Suddenly across the board you're seeing an increase of wages, something which doesn't fix the initial problem because that money has to come from something and you'll just see a price hike.
If they don't increase the wage for those being paid 10-12 dollars, why should they aspire for anything more than being the bare minimum if the guy next to him who was hired yesterday with no experience is being paid the same?
#44
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:56
#45
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:57
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Ravensword wrote...
Well, it becomes an issue when you're a large corporation that pays their full-time staff $7.25 an hour like McDonald's does. They make huge profits and can easily pay their full-time employees twice as much as they do now.
Tell that to the investors with a Roth IRA that they're plinking away at, trying to invest some money for retirement, and expecting acceptable returns on their money.
McDonalds (just like EA, for that matter, but this isn't a gaming topic) has a responsibility to the investors to make sound business decisions that result in strong dividends--or to make profits. They have an obligation to do that.
They don't have any obligation to the people that they hire outside of those that they choose to take on.
Modifié par EntropicAngel, 11 janvier 2014 - 02:58 .
#46
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 02:59
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
#47
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 03:00
Br3ad wrote...
Not just that, but raising the minimum wage will also have another effect. Yes, the quality of living for the employed will increase. However, jobs will decrease. Minimum wage causes the total amount of jobs to go down. We need a balance between dirt poor billions of workers, and Scrouge McDuck tens of workers(I'm talking extremes here).Dave of Canada wrote...
My own incomprehension of the situation will come across loud and clear in this post, just to inform you ahead.
Would increasing the minimum wage by a large amount really solve anything? If they paid minimum wage workers 7-8$ and then increased it to 10-12 dollars, wouldn't the employees who were paid 10-12 because of education/experience/promotion feel cheapened? Wouldn't you need to increase their wages to compensate for the new minimum wage?
Suddenly across the board you're seeing an increase of wages, something which doesn't fix the initial problem because that money has to come from something and you'll just see a price hike.
If they don't increase the wage for those being paid 10-12 dollars, why should they aspire for anything more than being the bare minimum if the guy next to him who was hired yesterday with no experience is being paid the same?
What about in a country like America, in which 10% of the top wealthy citizens own the vast majority of the country's wealth? There really is no balance between the most wealthy block of the country and everyone else.
#48
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 03:03
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Ravensword wrote...
What about in a country like America, in which 10% of the top wealthy citizens own the vast majority of the country's wealth? There really is no balance between the most wealthy block of the country and everyone else.
My main concern is why would a person want to educate himself or learn a skill if he can make 15 bucks an hour pushing shopping carts?
#49
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 03:03
Giving wealth to the poor won't solve the problem. Investing less in pay raises and more in education of the children will be the only thing that will solve America's problems. I say that as someone who does not live the best of lifestyles. Giving out more money is actually a lot worse than doing nothing. If our production goes up a lot more, we could actually afford to pay more in a meaningful way. That has to start early in a child's life, not when they are forty, with six kids, in a trailor park, and without a job.Ravensword wrote...
Br3ad wrote...
Not just that, but raising the minimum wage will also have another effect. Yes, the quality of living for the employed will increase. However, jobs will decrease. Minimum wage causes the total amount of jobs to go down. We need a balance between dirt poor billions of workers, and Scrouge McDuck tens of workers(I'm talking extremes here).Dave of Canada wrote...
My own incomprehension of the situation will come across loud and clear in this post, just to inform you ahead.
Would increasing the minimum wage by a large amount really solve anything? If they paid minimum wage workers 7-8$ and then increased it to 10-12 dollars, wouldn't the employees who were paid 10-12 because of education/experience/promotion feel cheapened? Wouldn't you need to increase their wages to compensate for the new minimum wage?
Suddenly across the board you're seeing an increase of wages, something which doesn't fix the initial problem because that money has to come from something and you'll just see a price hike.
If they don't increase the wage for those being paid 10-12 dollars, why should they aspire for anything more than being the bare minimum if the guy next to him who was hired yesterday with no experience is being paid the same?
What about in a country like America, in which 10% of the top wealthy citizens own the vast majority of the country's wealth? There really is no balance between the most wealthy block of the country and everyone else.
#50
Posté 11 janvier 2014 - 03:21
The Mad Hanar wrote...
Ravensword wrote...
What about in a country like America, in which 10% of the top wealthy citizens own the vast majority of the country's wealth? There really is no balance between the most wealthy block of the country and everyone else.
My main concern is why would a person want to educate himself or learn a skill if he can make 15 bucks an hour pushing shopping carts?
If people think that pushing carts is the be-all end-all of life, then certainly they have issues. A crappy job is still a crappy job and increasing wages won't magically make a job better. Otherwise, do you want to keep the system where people are paid very little and end up going on public assitance or welfare; that the taxpayer should underwrite the profits of very wealthy corporations? That just burns my ass.
No one is gonna bag groceries until retirement just b/c it pays $15 an hour. One would think that a person would aspire to something better, but whether or not a person does so, is not my problem, nor do I care as long as they corporations they're working for are not sucking up taxpayer money by not paying their full-time employees enough to put food on the table w/o having to go on public assistance.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






